A recent article in the Times-Picayune and Nola.com, “Louisiana just made it illegal to sue oil companies over climate change. So have other states,” describes a recent bill passed by the Louisiana legislature and signed into law by Gov. Jeff Landry (R) that bars groups from suing oil and gas companies over alleged downstream impacts of climate change. [some emphasis, links added]
This is a very positive development, as it is unreasonable to try to link storms and things like heat-related illness to any particular oil producer.
The bill, called the Louisiana Energy Protection Act, is intended to protect Louisiana oil and gas companies and other potential defendants from frivolous lawsuits over climate change.
The Times-Picayune article describes the potential lawsuits as intending to “hold oil and gas companies accountable for the impacts of sea level rise, extreme weather events, wildfires and flooding, arguing that the companies should pay for measures needed to adapt, such as seawalls and building elevations.”
Rep. Brett Geymann (R – Lake Charles), who wrote and sponsored the bill, expressed skepticism about human activity like burning oil and gas causing climate change, which the Times-Picayune article chastises, reciting the idea that there is “overwhelming consensus among scientists that greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels heat the planet.”
The “overwhelming consensus” line is overplayed and worthless when it comes to the facts, because that claim is extremely suspect, as a breakdown of the “97 percent consensus” study shows that scientists have a range of beliefs about how much humans contribute to global warming, and besides, scientific truth does not lean on consensus.
Geymann is quoted as saying “[t]o say my aunt died from a heat stroke and I’m going to sue every oil company and every pipeline company in Louisiana because of it — that is not a legitimate claim.” He is right to be skeptical that these lawsuits are anything but frivolous.
For one, oil and gas are necessary for the lifestyle that Louisiana residents live. The state’s heat and humidity are handled with copious, energy-intensive air conditioning almost year-round.
Stable, abundant, affordable electricity to handle that load comes mostly from natural gas in Louisiana, nearly 70 percent, with most of the rest made up by nuclear, then coal.
Louisiana residents are not going to give up air conditioning, or roads, or driving cars, or concrete, or medical technologies, pharmaceuticals, and electronics that rely on the byproducts of petroleum refining. Nor should they be forced to.
Attempting to run companies out of business with lawfare for making these essential products is much worse than the alleged impact of a degree or two of warming over more than a hundred years.
Another problem with these lawsuits is that they attempt to attribute a particular negative outcome, such as sea-level rise, to a single company or industry and assign damages based on that company’s contributions.
But a single oil company in Louisiana only contributes an immeasurably small amount of emissions—upstream and downstream—to the global count.
And it is not the oil company itself that is producing the emissions; it is the public, the users of its products, including city and state governments, businesses, and households that use oil and gas and produce emissions.
Also, something like sea level rise has many contributing factors, including the effects of local thermal expansion of water, which may have nothing at all to do with global warming, and land subsidence, which is often completely disconnected from climate change or weather.
Major civil engineering projects to keep New Orleans from slipping under the waves have been ongoing since the city was first established, long before modern warming trends.
Oil companies, particularly pipeline companies, can contribute to erosion and channel formation in coastal tidelands, which can worsen land erosion; this bill does not bar groups from suing over those very direct and real impacts.
Thus far, most climate lawfare has been more about harassing oil and gas producers and costing them money than actually solving any problems, and certainly cannot stop sea-level rise or hurricanes, both of which have occurred throughout history.
As numerous Climate at a Glance papers demonstrate, trends in those and other weather-related events have not worsened, and fewer people are dying now from temperatures or extreme weather events than at any time in history.
It is the state’s job to handle major civil engineering projects such as building levees, so long as it wants to maintain below-sea-level cities. Louisiana’s legislature and Gov. Landry did a good thing by blocking unscientific and frivolous potential lawfare from climate-obsessed environmental groups.
Read more at Climate Realism
So where’s Greene refuting that it was only 97% of scientists (refuted many times over) but instead it is 99.7% of scientists who insist human burning carbon-based fuels are actually causing warming.