Repealing the EPA’s endangerment finding weakens the case for more climate spending and exposes the shaky foundation behind carbon regulation.

A closer look at the 19th-century experiment behind modern greenhouse theory—and why its findings don’t hold up today.

EPA’s repeal of the endangerment finding may fail in court unless the Supreme Court overturns Massachusetts v. EPA.

Climate models, extreme weather claims, and CO2 assumptions don’t hold up when tested against real-world data.

How a already decided EPA ruling became the legal backbone of U.S. climate policy—and why its scientific foundation is now coming apart.

Federal officials say a University of Minnesota wind turbine killed a bald eagle, triggering penalties under federal wildlife law.

NYT acknowledges observable data show Arctic cold blasts are becoming less extreme, despite claims tying them to polar vortex disruption.

Internal records show DEI mandates shaped team selection in Biden-era climate research, prioritizing race, gender, and 'lived experience.'

Automakers have written down $140 billion chasing EV mandates as taxpayers foot the bill through subsidies and fuel-economy credits.

Media blame Trump for “future cancer” tied to refining Venezuelan oil, but evidence doesn’t back up the scare.

Engineer Ron Barmby explains why net-zero policies fail the science, the economics, and the people they hurt most.

A coalition of state attorneys general accused the climate chapter of advocacy, leading the Federal Judicial Center to pull it.