The Washington Post’s once-bloated climate desk is shrinking as media outlets quietly retreat from years of alarmist coverage.

House lawmakers examined how foreign money is backing climate lawsuits aimed at hobbling U.S. energy companies.

Real-world data and standard statistical tests challenge the assumed causal link between CO2 levels and rising global temperatures.

Official wage data show U.S. paychecks rising during recent mild warming, contradicting claims that climate change has cut incomes.

Supreme Court ruling opens the door to legal challenges against California’s 2035 electric vehicle mandate.

Repealing the EPA’s endangerment finding weakens the case for more climate spending and exposes the shaky foundation behind carbon regulation.

A closer look at the 19th-century experiment behind modern greenhouse theory—and why its findings don’t hold up today.

EPA’s repeal of the endangerment finding may fail in court unless the Supreme Court overturns Massachusetts v. EPA.

Climate models, extreme weather claims, and CO2 assumptions don’t hold up when tested against real-world data.

How a already decided EPA ruling became the legal backbone of U.S. climate policy—and why its scientific foundation is now coming apart.

Federal officials say a University of Minnesota wind turbine killed a bald eagle, triggering penalties under federal wildlife law.

NYT acknowledges observable data show Arctic cold blasts are becoming less extreme, despite claims tying them to polar vortex disruption.