• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Delusional Dems: California’s Green Energy Grid Is On Dirty Life Support

by Zachary Faria
August 31, 2023, 2:44 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
12

newsomGov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) has learned the hard way that California’s renewable energy experiment was reckless and ill-thought-out, and should require some serious self-reflection.

California’s green energy dream is now getting dirtier, as Newsom tries to avoid the bad headlines that another round of blackouts would bring for the state with the highest energy prices in the contiguous United States. [emphasis, links added]

Newsom had campaigned on shutting down the Aliso Canyon gas storage facility. Now, the state is considering expanding the facility and increasing its storage by two-thirds.

It is the latest in a series of walkbacks for California’s weak green dream. Newsom backed extensions for gas plants and gave the green light to gas-powered generators to bail out the grid regularly.

He has also called for an extension for the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant, which doesn’t produce carbon emissions but makes climate zealots uncomfortable because they don’t like the word “nuclear.”

Simply put, Newsom is realizing that California’s grid cannot function without fossil fuels and nuclear energy, which is what every person with some sense has been saying since he and other California Democrats tried to fast-track an energy grid run on inefficient “green” forms of energy such as wind and solar.

All of California’s promises of phasing out “dirty” energy and running entirely on renewables to save the world ran face first into the dirty reality that renewables just aren’t that good.

Newsom appointees were basing this dream on their own hopeful projections, and they were laughably, predictably wrong.

Now Newsom, desperate to avoid further harming his future political career (and inevitable presidential run, whether that be next year or in the future) has to turn to those dirty fossil fuels and (not actually dirty) nuclear plants to keep the lights on.

Just like California’s series of failures in water storage, forest fires, poverty, homelessness, and crime, this was a predictable development.

Everyone saw it coming except the pie-in-the-sky liberals that run the state, who were so convinced that they were revolutionary geniuses who could build a better grid while listening to delusional climate activists.

Unfortunately, as is the case too often in California, they were returned to our dirty reality once again.

Top image via YouTube/screencap

Read more at Washington Examiner

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024

Comments 12

  1. Shoki Kaneda says:
    3 years ago

    Leftists do not introspect when their absurd schemes fail. They look for someone else to blame.

  2. David Lewis says:
    3 years ago

    Both California and Germany have reacted the same way to infeasibility of using wind and solar. When it gets to the point that their policies would make blackouts a routine part of life, they pull back and rely on fossil fuels. In a way this is too bad. Routine blackouts would force a strong reversal of their policies. Yet, stopping just short of these blackouts leaves them in condition where their policies have resulted in very high energy costs.

    • Sonnyhill says:
      3 years ago

      Yes, they’re pulling out the parachute like big -talkin’ Evel Knievel at the Snake River canyon. Self preservation.

  3. SPURWING PLOVER says:
    3 years ago

    The Stupid Jackass Party our Governor is s a total idiot and wants to ban gasoline cars all over a totally fake theory of Global Warming/Climate Change

  4. Rhee says:
    3 years ago

    As a denizen of the north part of LA, I remember the Aliso Canyon incident and the literal headaches it caused when the gas company couldn’t control the gas well leakage; certainly Sempra paid dearly for that in both direct housing assistance and governance penalties to the state and county, and then afterward the limitation of running the wells at less than half capacity for the past 8 years as Newsom pandered to the activists picketing to wholly shut down the Aliso Canyon field. Our local energy prices, both natural gas and electricity have skyrocketed due to the constraints on the gas wells, so it’s no surprise PUC has to finally lift the limitations and bring the wells back toward 100% full capacity and likely in coming years expand beyond the current capacity by opening more of the old oil caverns.

    • George J Kamburoff says:
      3 years ago

      Why are you still paying for electricity and gasoline?
      We don’t, because our PV solar system on the roof powers our household and electric cars.

      • Roland says:
        3 years ago

        Did you pay for your solar panels and installation? How much? How long will the panels last?

      • Bobby says:
        3 years ago

        Smug much? I bet you buy some electricity from the grid.

  5. Sonnyhill says:
    3 years ago

    I suggest that the press and Republicans back this slime ball into a corner, where he has to admit that his Green policies were wrong, impossible. If he’s wrong, the rest his ilk are wrong. The Californians who have joined the exodus to red states, took their skills and money with them, remind me of the Jews who fled Nazi Germany. Smart and prosperous.

    • Steve Bunten says:
      3 years ago

      Unfortunately we won’t see this in the mainstream media but the Republicans should certainly highlight this walk-back. Perhaps if the Newsome-DeSantis debate happen that is something that should be asked and make him squirm as he tries to extricate himself from this.

    • George J Kamburoff says:
      3 years ago

      Solar power runs our household and electric cars.
      Do you still pay for electricity and gasoline?

      • Steve Bunten says:
        3 years ago

        Where do you get your electricity at night? Or do you burn candles then?

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • Earth cloudsNew Study: Climate Shows Greater Sensitivity To Solar Forcing Than Models Assume
    Apr 21, 2026
    Study finds lower climate sensitivity to CO2 and suggests solar forcing and natural variability play a larger role in warming since 1850. […]
  • palisades fire aftermathMedia Outlet Blames Climate Change For California’s High Costs, Ignores Actual Drivers
    Apr 21, 2026
    Rising costs are driven by the Golden State's energy, insurance, and regulatory policies, not baseless climate change claims. […]
  • obama solar panel pushLeaked Internal Memos Show How SCOTUS Blocked Obama’s Clean Power Plan
    Apr 21, 2026
    Leaked memos reveal a divided Supreme Court as justices rushed to issue a stay blocking Obama’s Clean Power Plan before full review. […]
  • mini Idaho nuclear dome reactorUS Opens DOME Facility In Idaho To Test Mini Nuclear Reactors
    Apr 20, 2026
    US opens DOME facility in Idaho, enabling real-world testing of mini nuclear reactors for safety data and regulatory approval. […]
  • atlantic waves shoreMeteorologist Sinks The Independent’s Claim The Atlantic Current Is Nearing Collapse
    Apr 20, 2026
    Observations show no sign of imminent Atlantic current collapse; critics say alarmist claims rely on extreme model scenarios. […]
  • solar panels cropsThe High Price Of Climate Virtue Signaling Is Destructive
    Apr 20, 2026
    Achieving 'net zero' carbon emissions will result in significant costs, loss of personal freedoms, and lower living standards for billions worldwide. […]
  • tornado small townClimate Expert Breaks Down U.S. Tornado Damage And Frequency Trends Through 2025
    Apr 20, 2026
    New data shows U.S. tornado damage and frequency trends through 2025, with no increase in normalized losses or major tornado incidence. […]
  • louisiana coast legalSupreme Court Sends Chevron Environmental Case To Federal Court
    Apr 17, 2026
    Supreme Court sends Chevron coastal damage case to federal court, backing company bid to shift Louisiana lawsuit out of state court. […]
  • heat deaths trendsThe Climate Scaremongers: Inflated Heat Death Claims Don’t Match Summer Mortality Data
    Apr 17, 2026
    UK “heat deaths” rely on estimates, not death certificates, while actual mortality data shows deaths fall steadily through summer. […]
  • media climate narrative machineGlobal Media Climate Coverage Drops As Public Interest Slips
    Apr 17, 2026
    Climate stories fell 14% globally in 2025 as the public tunes out warming agitprop, continuing a wider decline in media coverage across major regions. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky