• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Delusional Dems: California’s Green Energy Grid Is On Dirty Life Support

by Zachary Faria
August 31, 2023, 2:44 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
12

newsomGov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) has learned the hard way that California’s renewable energy experiment was reckless and ill-thought-out, and should require some serious self-reflection.

California’s green energy dream is now getting dirtier, as Newsom tries to avoid the bad headlines that another round of blackouts would bring for the state with the highest energy prices in the contiguous United States. [emphasis, links added]

Newsom had campaigned on shutting down the Aliso Canyon gas storage facility. Now, the state is considering expanding the facility and increasing its storage by two-thirds.

It is the latest in a series of walkbacks for California’s weak green dream. Newsom backed extensions for gas plants and gave the green light to gas-powered generators to bail out the grid regularly.

He has also called for an extension for the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant, which doesn’t produce carbon emissions but makes climate zealots uncomfortable because they don’t like the word “nuclear.”

Simply put, Newsom is realizing that California’s grid cannot function without fossil fuels and nuclear energy, which is what every person with some sense has been saying since he and other California Democrats tried to fast-track an energy grid run on inefficient “green” forms of energy such as wind and solar.

All of California’s promises of phasing out “dirty” energy and running entirely on renewables to save the world ran face first into the dirty reality that renewables just aren’t that good.

Newsom appointees were basing this dream on their own hopeful projections, and they were laughably, predictably wrong.

Now Newsom, desperate to avoid further harming his future political career (and inevitable presidential run, whether that be next year or in the future) has to turn to those dirty fossil fuels and (not actually dirty) nuclear plants to keep the lights on.

Just like California’s series of failures in water storage, forest fires, poverty, homelessness, and crime, this was a predictable development.

Everyone saw it coming except the pie-in-the-sky liberals that run the state, who were so convinced that they were revolutionary geniuses who could build a better grid while listening to delusional climate activists.

Unfortunately, as is the case too often in California, they were returned to our dirty reality once again.

Top image via YouTube/screencap

Read more at Washington Examiner

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026

Comments 12

  1. Shoki Kaneda says:
    3 years ago

    Leftists do not introspect when their absurd schemes fail. They look for someone else to blame.

  2. David Lewis says:
    3 years ago

    Both California and Germany have reacted the same way to infeasibility of using wind and solar. When it gets to the point that their policies would make blackouts a routine part of life, they pull back and rely on fossil fuels. In a way this is too bad. Routine blackouts would force a strong reversal of their policies. Yet, stopping just short of these blackouts leaves them in condition where their policies have resulted in very high energy costs.

    • Sonnyhill says:
      3 years ago

      Yes, they’re pulling out the parachute like big -talkin’ Evel Knievel at the Snake River canyon. Self preservation.

  3. SPURWING PLOVER says:
    3 years ago

    The Stupid Jackass Party our Governor is s a total idiot and wants to ban gasoline cars all over a totally fake theory of Global Warming/Climate Change

  4. Rhee says:
    3 years ago

    As a denizen of the north part of LA, I remember the Aliso Canyon incident and the literal headaches it caused when the gas company couldn’t control the gas well leakage; certainly Sempra paid dearly for that in both direct housing assistance and governance penalties to the state and county, and then afterward the limitation of running the wells at less than half capacity for the past 8 years as Newsom pandered to the activists picketing to wholly shut down the Aliso Canyon field. Our local energy prices, both natural gas and electricity have skyrocketed due to the constraints on the gas wells, so it’s no surprise PUC has to finally lift the limitations and bring the wells back toward 100% full capacity and likely in coming years expand beyond the current capacity by opening more of the old oil caverns.

    • George J Kamburoff says:
      3 years ago

      Why are you still paying for electricity and gasoline?
      We don’t, because our PV solar system on the roof powers our household and electric cars.

      • Roland says:
        3 years ago

        Did you pay for your solar panels and installation? How much? How long will the panels last?

      • Bobby says:
        3 years ago

        Smug much? I bet you buy some electricity from the grid.

  5. Sonnyhill says:
    3 years ago

    I suggest that the press and Republicans back this slime ball into a corner, where he has to admit that his Green policies were wrong, impossible. If he’s wrong, the rest his ilk are wrong. The Californians who have joined the exodus to red states, took their skills and money with them, remind me of the Jews who fled Nazi Germany. Smart and prosperous.

    • Steve Bunten says:
      3 years ago

      Unfortunately we won’t see this in the mainstream media but the Republicans should certainly highlight this walk-back. Perhaps if the Newsome-DeSantis debate happen that is something that should be asked and make him squirm as he tries to extricate himself from this.

    • George J Kamburoff says:
      3 years ago

      Solar power runs our household and electric cars.
      Do you still pay for electricity and gasoline?

      • Steve Bunten says:
        3 years ago

        Where do you get your electricity at night? Or do you burn candles then?

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • cartoon scientist rcp85 dumpsterClimate Science Without Its Most Discredited Worst-Case Scenario
    Jun 1, 2026
    The IPCC has retired RCP 8.5, its most discredited worst-case emissions scenario — here's what that means for climate science going forward. […]
  • stock exchange floorBiden’s SEC Climate Rule Is On The Chopping Block — Here’s Why
    Jun 1, 2026
    The SEC has proposed rescinding a Biden-era rule forcing public companies to disclose climate risks, saying the mandate exceeded the agency's authority. […]
  • nytimes hq underwaterOof! NY Times Dances Around UN Scientists Scrapping Trendy Climate Armageddon Scenario
    May 29, 2026
    The NY Times soft-pedals the death of RCP8.5 — the doomsday climate scenario its own reporters hyped for years as inevitable. […]
  • earth bbc signBBC Puts Its Own Spin On Earth’s Climate-Driven ‘Rotation Crisis’
    May 29, 2026
    BBC hypes a 1.33 millisecond-per-century change in Earth's rotation as 'unprecedented,' but natural variation dwarfs it and the effect is biologically nil. […]
  • frozen thames maunder minimumDeclining Solar Activity Confirms New Little Ice Age Has Begun, Researchers Say
    May 29, 2026
    New research links declining solar activity to a Grand Solar Minimum, confirming a new Little Ice Age with 1°C cooling expected by mid-century. […]
  • Newsom presser on gas price lawCalif. Unions Use Environmental Law To Fight Newsom’s Return-To-Office Order
    May 29, 2026
    California unions are weaponizing CEQA, the state's environmental review law, to block Newsom's return-to-office mandate for state workers. […]
  • Amsterdam’s Ban On Meat And Oil Ads Exposes The Farce Of Climate Alarmism
    May 28, 2026
    Amsterdam banned public ads for meat and fossil fuels, exposing climate alarmism's hollow core of grand gestures and zero real-world results. […]
  • airliner airport jetLefty UK Newspaper Claims ICE Deportations Worsen ‘Global Warming’
    May 28, 2026
    The Guardian claims ICE's 2025 deportation flights emitted 335,000 tonnes of CO2 — just 0.05% of U.S. domestic airline emissions. […]
  • gavel wetlandsLouisiana Climate Lawfare Bill Hobbled By Last-Minute Activist Amendment
    May 28, 2026
    Louisiana's HB 804 climate litigation shield was weakened by a Senate amendment protecting 40+ coastal lawsuits from preemption. […]
  • newsom solar maniaInside Gavin Newsom’s $900 Million Solar Scam
    May 28, 2026
    California's SOMAH program promised solar panels for a million low-income renters but delivered just over 65,000 — with $700 million still unspent. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky