• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

California’s Renewable-Heavy Grid At Risk Of Blackouts, Needs Diesel Backup

by Addison Smith
June 05, 2023, 12:10 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
8

newsomCalifornia appears to be presenting the green movement with yet another reality check.

Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom has set forth arguably the country’s most ambitious state-level plan to transition from fossil fuel to renewable energy.

However, when California’s almost inevitable heat waves come in the summer and residents crank up their home air conditioners, officials turn on massive diesel-powered generators to make up for the state’s energy shortfall and to avoid rolling blackouts. [emphasis, links added]

“We laid out the markers on solar and wind, but we recognize that’s not going to get us where we need to go,” Newsom said during a recent news conference. “The issue of reliability has to be addressed.”

The summertime problem is especially acute in the early evenings when electricity from solar is not as abundant, according to the Associated Press.

To avoid running out of power this summer, as California has in recent years, Newsom wants to buy massive amounts of renewable energy.

The idea is to use the state’s purchasing power, or deep pockets, to convince private companies to build large-scale power plants that run off of heat from underground sites and strong winds blowing off the coast – the kinds of power that utility companies have not been buying because it’s too expensive and because the plants take too long to build, the wire service also reports.

Newsom has positioned the state as the most progressive when it comes to addressing climate change through clean energy.

Under his leadership, California is pushing to run on “100% clean electricity” by 2045, a move that will require building 148,000 megawatts of new power by then.

To achieve the goal, the state is fast-tracking wind, solar, and battery storage projects, but still remains dependent on the diesel generators each summer.

Newsom’s plan is to award grants for businesses to build power plants sourced from underground renewables and coastal wind farms.

Another aspect of the plan is to use a central procurement mechanism that would effectively combine the buying power of customers to cost-effectively procure such energy resources, then distribute it among those customers, according to the state’s green energy roadmap.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration reports California imports more electric power than any state in the nation, despite its “significant” amount of crude oil.

In addition, California’s petroleum refineries make up 10% of the United States’ total crude oil refining capacity.

Power the Future’s Daniel Turner told Just The News that Newsom is “suffering the consequences of his own green agenda.”

“Renewable energy is proven to be a failure, both unreliable and expensive, and only free government money and mandates put on the utility companies keep them afloat,” he said.

Turner also argued that California likely wouldn’t be forced into rolling blackouts had the state not “aggressively closed nuclear and coal plants” and upended its own grid.

“This is not the result of climate change but of a political agenda, which ignores market forces and basic physics,” he said.

Climate Depot founder Marc Morano has a similar view, saying Newsom is giving his residents the “highest energy prices in the nation” due to the governor being “blinded by climate ideology.”

Those prices, Morano said, are bound to climb even further even if Newsom’s latest “scheme” is realized.

In April, Just the News reported that two utility companies in the state – San Diego Gas & Electric, PG&E, and Southern California Edison – are considering a plan to put the higher energy costs on those with higher incomes instead of consumption.

The proposal was filed jointly with California’s Public Utilities Commission and would be fixed as follows:

  • Less than $28,000 – $15 a month
  • $28,000 – $69,000 – $20 a month
  • $69,000 – $180,000 – $51 a month
  • Over $180,000 – $85 a month

Read more at Just The News

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024

Comments 8

  1. SPURWING PLOVER says:
    3 years ago

    We shouldn’t place the Nation under total 100% renewables since their not reliable enough

    Reply
  2. SPURWING PLOVER says:
    3 years ago

    Newsom like the rest of the Liberal Democrats bases everything on Politics and the plans of the Globalists and the UN,DNC,CFR

    Reply
  3. Graham McDonald says:
    3 years ago

    “…that two utility companies in the state – San Diego Gas & Electric, PG&E, and Southern California Edison…”

    Whops, ‘three’ companies.

    Reply
  4. David Lewis says:
    3 years ago

    The idea of charging different power rates dependant on income is ludicrous and probably would fail a court challenge. Consider buying a gallon of milk. The same concept would have the price at $2.25, $3.00, $7.65, $12.75 depending on income.

    Reply
  5. David Lewis says:
    3 years ago

    Can someone tell me what “run off of heat from underground sites” means? My guess is heating something underground as a means of storing energy. If this is true basic physics says it is bad idea. The amount of energy that can be stored by heating a substance up is quite small compared to what can be stored by chemical means such as batteries or what is found in natural gas.

    The natural world has the cards stacked against net zero. On the average solar is not available twelve hours a day, and it has ten times the energy density of wind power. When it is very hot or very cold, the air is often still. That means little or no wind power when it is needed the most. The uninformed think that batteries are the answer, but they are unaffordable on the scale needed to run a grid even if enough rare earth mineral are available to make them at that scale.

    Reply
    • Graham McDonald says:
      3 years ago

      “run off of heat from underground sites”

      I believe that is a politians way of saying ‘geothermal’. In California, Casa Diablo is a case in point. More at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammoth_Geothermal_Complex

      Reply
      • David Lewis says:
        3 years ago

        Some neighborhoods in my home town of Klamath Falls Oregon use geothermal heat. However, this form of energy has the same draw back as hydroelectric in that there isn’t enough of it. When it comes to producing electric power much less is available due the fact the wells are usually below the boiling point of water, where as burning coal or natural gas has heat sources around 3,500 degrees.

        Reply
        • Graham McDonald says:
          3 years ago

          I don’t know if it ever came about. Casa Diablo was to run a pipeline for ‘used’ steam up to Mammoth Lakes Village to be used under sidewalks to melt snow. (Got that ‘info’ from a heavy equipment operator who worked on the centralized propane delivery system for the village. Could have been ‘just talk’.)

          Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • transmission lines grid electricityHow Late June’s Heatwave Melted Britain’s Power Network
    Jun 26, 2026
    Britain’s energy grid is getting slammed by a surprise heatwave, geopolitical turmoil, and bad luck, revealing its vulnerabilities. […]
  • australian solar farmSurvey: Number Of Australians Worried About Climate Change Drops To 12 Percent
    Jun 26, 2026
    A McKinsey survey finds only 12 percent of Australian consumers are worried about climate change, down from 19 percent the previous quarter. […]
  • crops harvest tractorRecord Harvests Demolish Bloomberg’s Climate Food Scare
    Jun 26, 2026
    Bloomberg claims climate change is driving food prices higher, but data show CO2 and modest warming have boosted crop yields and slashed global hunger. […]
  • france reflecting pool heatEuropean Nations Chose Climate Ideology Over Air Conditioning — And People Died
    Jun 26, 2026
    Europe has 1-in-5 homes with AC while the US sits at 90% — and the death toll gap between continents tells the real story. […]
  • vehicle tiresThe Hidden Cost of California’s ‘Green’ Tire Mandate: Fewer Choices, Shorter Tread Life
    Jun 26, 2026
    California's tire efficiency rule promises driver savings, but shorter tread life, fewer choices, and a potential aftermarket ban tell a different story. […]
  • jena griswold coloColorado AG Frontrunner Vows More Climate Litigation – With Or Without The Governor
    Jun 25, 2026
    Climate litigation is a key issue in the Colorado attorney general race, with all Dem candidates supporting Boulder’s lawsuit against energy companies. […]
  • oil tanker gulf coastExperts Warn Ro Khanna’s Gas Export Ban Will Backfire On Americans
    Jun 25, 2026
    Experts warn Rep. Ro Khanna's Gasoline Export Ban Act would backfire, raising prices and hurting the truckers and farmers it claims to help. […]
  • cartoon amoc collapsePeople Don’t Fear An AMOC Collapse Because The Science Doesn’t Add Up
    Jun 25, 2026
    The AMOC evidence problem isn't about imagery — it's about two decades of contradictory science and unverified collapse predictions. […]
  • gretaFLASHBACK: Fact-Checkers Furiously Spun Greta Thunberg’s 2018 Eco-Apocalypse Tweet
    Jun 24, 2026
    Critics revisited a deleted tweet from 2018, prompting fact-checkers to defend Greta Thunberg saying humanity will get wiped out in five years. […]
  • stormy pacific oceanNew Report: From Hurricanes To Global Disasters, ENSO Leaves A Costly Trail
    Jun 24, 2026
    A new report examines how El Niño and La Niña cycles drive U.S. hurricane damage and global disaster losses — and what it means for 2026. […]

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Sunset on Net Zero

Canary in a Climate World

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky