State legislators in Democrat-run California are looking to pass a law that will make it easy for the power company (PG&E) to steal energy from your electric car battery.
The idea is this: when California’s third-world electric grid needs extra juice, the power company will simply suck that juice straight from your electric car battery. [emphasis, links added]
This is possible due to what’s known as “bi-directional” charging, which was originally conceived as a way to use your electric car as an emergency generator in the event of a power outage, which is a nifty idea.
Naturally, Democrats and PG&E only see a way to use this technology to further their evil designs:
“California’s power grid will have to expand in order to meet the demand for more energy. PG&E’s CEO Patricia Poppe has come up with an “unconventional” idea, using electric cars to send excess power back to the grid to prevent blackouts.”
We need to stop here and discuss the word “expand.” If I buy groceries, put some of those groceries in the refrigerator, and then go back later to retrieve those refrigerated groceries, did I “expand” my groceries? Obviously not.
“Lawmakers in Sacramento are helping to move things along,” the report says. “For example, Senate Bill 233 would make bi-directional charging mandatory for all new electric vehicles.”
In fact, San Diego already has a “pilot program with school buses using bi-directional charging that feeds into the grid at the end of the day.”
“It’s a gigantic unharnessed, untapped power source that can be used. Most vehicles are sitting parked, unused 95 percent of the time,” Kurt Johnson of the Climate Center said. He adds that “125 plus vehicle-to-grid projects are going on globally.”
This does not create even one extra kilowatt of power.
All it does is drain your car battery’s power, which is the power you are going to have to put right back into that battery.
And how exactly will the grid remain stable when millions of electric vehicle owners are all in a panic charging their cars at 6:30 a.m. so they can get to work?
Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey explains, “It’s the ultimate in authoritarian redistribution — no real production, and lots of opportunity for losses and scarcity rationing”:
It instead creates a kind of three-card Monty with the grid — shifting power to the vehicles, and then pulling it back when the state decides to apply it elsewhere. It’s only an illusion of a solution; no additional power gets created. PG&E and the state would simply confiscate that power for their own uses as they see fit. Technically, the grid would operate more efficiently if it never charged the EVs at all, considering the inevitable power losses that would take place in regional “bidirectional charging.”
…
There’s nothing wrong with owning an EV if you choose to do so. This, however, isn’t a choice. California is forcing its citizens into EVs, mandating the end of gasoline-powered personal vehicle sales in the next decade, and is already planning to exploit its monopoly on vehicle energy for its own ends. This proposal in particular exploits that monopoly to cover up the insane and destructive energy policies of the Democrat government monopoly in Sacramento. Internal combustion vehicles and their decentralized, independent power sourcing are still the best choice for freedom — which is why California Democrats want to eradicate them.
And it’s not as if charging your vehicle at home tops your tank. For every hour you charge at home from a standard outlet, all you gain is two to four miles of range.
Even if you purchase Tesla’s handy-dandy adaptor that pulls 40 amps, you might get 30 to 40 miles of charge per hour, but what good is that if the electric company steals it?
What if you need 70 miles of range per day? Do you have two free hours in the morning to refresh your charge? Do you really want to hit the California highway system with only 60 to 80 miles of charge?
Californians are so stupid they are voting for politicians who would propose this plan before they would propose something as radical as, say, building new power plants.
And what do these idiots think powers their precious electric cars? Where do they think that electricity comes from? Most of it comes from burning coal. These are not electric-powered cars. These are coal-fired cars.
Top photo by Ernest Ojeh on Unsplash
Read rest at Breitbart
Hello to all, how is the whole thing, I think every one is getting
more from this web site, and your views are fastidious in favor of new viewers.
At one time everyone wanted to go to California it was the song CALIFORNIA HERE I COME now everyone’s leaving and our Governor with sawdust for Brains just continues to make it worse
Good analysis, David. Green socialists are not physicists. Transmission, conversion and storage involves losses.
The Green dream is inferior to what we have now. The voters need an education. Stop listening to the crazies.
When a battery is charged some of the energy is lost as heat. When power is drawn from a battery there is also a loss. In a system starving for energy, charging and discharging EV batteries to support the grid is going to result in energy loss. This loss will happen on the consumer’s side of the utility meter so he will be paying for it. What is worse, when we consider that EV batteries have a limited number of times they can be charged and discharged, the practice will shorten the life of a very expensive battery.
I’m sure some entrepreneur will develop a box to put between the house wiring and EV charger. When the box detects the power flow going in the wrong direction, it will isolate the charger from the home wiring.
Will the electric firetrucks/emt ambulances vehicles also be bi directional, cop cars? Will you get paid at market rates what they steal what you paid for? In a state that hates resource extraction, this is what you get.
“…pilot program with school buses…”
Just think, two cold cloudy windless days – “No school tomorrow, the busses can’t move”.
It’s a good thing that school children can’t vote — yet.
The kids could just do remote learning, assuming there’s any electricity to power their laptops to connect to the virtual classroom. Sounds like a really great idea, right!?
California used to be cool. I can remember having breakfast in Morrow Bay and thinking that was where I wanted to live and work. I’m over it.