• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

There’s A Reason China’s Flag Is Red, Not Green

by Thomas J. Duesterberg
3 months ago
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
2

china coal terminal port

Before environmental protection became a global issue, Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping taught that “only development is a solid truth.” Deng saw the degradation of the environment as a “necessary evil” in the drive for Chinese growth. [emphasis, links added]

As a result, China now leads the world in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, land and water pollution, and the depletion of natural resources.

China’s current leader, Xi Jinping, has pledged to build what he calls an “ecological civilization” in service of a net-zero future. This is a claim ripe for re-evaluation, especially with Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen on a visit to Beijing and Earth Day approaching.

The Chinese Communist Party isn’t a serious steward of the global commons, and Western leaders must refute this dangerously misleading narrative.

China’s record of environmental degradation starts with its exploitation of Asia’s water resources. Mao Zedong cut down as much as a third of the country’s forests to expand agriculture and build modern industry.

He ordered the breakneck construction of infrastructure to harness the hydroelectric potential of China’s rivers.

As a result, China’s landscape is scarred by a system of groundwater wells, dikes, and canals that move water from the country’s fertile south to its arid north.

To meet its population’s growing thirst for electricity and irrigation, in 1986 China undertook a massive program to control the waters of the Tibetan plateau and the Himalayas.

Beijing has erected dozens of hydroelectric dams on the tributaries of the main rivers of Southeast Asia: the Mekong, Irrawaddy, and Salween.

The reservoirs created by these projects capture enough water to fill the Chesapeake Bay and allow China to control the flow levels of these vital rivers.

Beijing’s interruption of Southeast Asia’s normal flow cycles has damaged rice-intensive agriculture and freshwater fishpond aquaculture downstream, especially in Vietnam and Thailand.

Compounding the problem, the Chinese Communist Party refuses to cooperate with the multinational Mekong River Commission—loath to share control of the vital river.

China also controls the headwaters of the three main rivers of North India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh: the Brahmaputra, the Indus, and the Ganges, which also emerge from western Tibet and the Himalayas.

Beijing has built more than a dozen dams to generate hydroelectric power from these massive rivers. In 2020 it announced a plan to build the world’s largest hydroelectric project on the upper Brahmaputra, raising alarms in Delhi and Dhaka.

Despite these massive hydroengineering efforts, China can’t feed its people or supply enough water for its industrial economy. More than 75% of China’s surface water supply is contaminated and undrinkable.

Under current United Nations standards, the amount of water available in Beijing places the megalopolis in a state of “extreme water scarcity.”

Much of China’s farmland is too polluted by heavy minerals and salinization to grow edible crops.

China is now the world’s largest importer of feed grains, accounting for 60% of global imports of soybeans. It also imports 70% of its cooking oils.

chinese shipping port
China’s 5G Tianjin Port. Image via YouTube screencap

China’s import binge is a major cause of deforestation in South America. Environmental researchers estimate that China is the largest contributor to deforestation in the Amazon and nearby Atlantic regions, home to the world’s two largest remaining rainforests.

One recent study concluded that 51% of China’s timber imports are sourced from countries with “weak governance, poor rule of law, and/or documented evidence of widespread illegal deforestation.”

Beijing is the world’s largest exporter of wood products but is also the world’s second-largest importer of timber, wood pulp, and paper. Its predatory use of resources across Asia has driven the depletion of old-growth forests.

As Beijing degrades Asia’s water and land resources, it also pollutes the world’s air. China is the world’s leading emitter of carbon dioxide, with emission levels more than 50% higher than those of the U.S., Europe, and Japan combined.

Communist Party leadership authorizes the construction of dozens of coal-fired power plants.

China also builds military facilities atop coral reefs to dominate fishing and sea lanes in the Yellow and South China seas. In the process, it has destroyed some 90 square miles of coral reefs.

Yet by committing to work toward a net-zero emissions goal and claiming to provide development assistance to the struggling countries of the southern hemisphere, Beijing has largely avoided global pushback against its environmental record.

Last year it reneged on its net-zero commitment with little public outcry.

China’s practice of paying lip service to environmental stewardship shouldn’t go unchallenged. Western leaders should increase public and diplomatic pressure on Beijing to take measurable steps to curb its destructive practices.

Western diplomats should cultivate alliances with the Asian nations most affected by China’s aggressive efforts to control the continent’s water supplies.

Stronger measures, such as cutting China off from loans from multilateral development banks, actively helping the Philippines and Japan counter China’s illegal appropriation of coral reefs and exclusive fishing zones, and stronger trade restrictions should also be considered.

China poses the greatest threat to the health of the global commons. Until Beijing seriously commits to environmental stewardship, the West shouldn’t allow it to claim that it does.

Top image via YouTube screencap

Read more at WSJ

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Truth
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Del
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki iconOdnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • Yummly
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related

Next Post

The Climate Con And The Media Censorship Complex – Part 1

Comments 2

  1. SPURWING PLOVER says:
    3 months ago

    By far the Commies are fat worse for the Environment they capitalism ever was the end of the Soviet Union showed to the rest of us the mess their hazardous waste they left behind

  2. Sonnyhill says:
    3 months ago

    Not mentioned in Duesterberg’s rant is China’s per capita environmental impact. China is doing what most every Western developing country has done to get where they are now. Brazil made this point years ago when they were criticized for clearing land in the Amazon basin, and I agreed with them. They were doing what America did.
    Another point that I take issue with is Duesterberg’s anti-dam building rant. Hydroelectric energy exploitation and water management is just plain smart, if done beneficially, regardless of his issues with CO2 “emissions”. China hasn’t and won’t fall for the UN’s climate fraud. While we hobble our economy with wind turbines and carbon taxes, China is growing as a military threat to you and me. They can afford it.
    I always figured that the global warming anti-fuel hoax was aimed at America. The EU UN were wringing their hands when Gorbachev acquiesced to President Reagan. ” The world’s only superpower? We need to find another.” China.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Media Ignorantly Blame Climate Change For Heat-Related Deaths During Hajj Pilgrimage
    Jun 28, 2024
    The deaths of more than 1,300 people at this year’s Hajj attributed to heat is tragic, but historically not uncommon. […]
  • UN secretary general antonio guterresThe UN Emperor Has No Science (Just Mangled Metaphors To Pitch Extreme Climate Alarmism)
    Jun 28, 2024
    History will record that the United Nations and its emperor as the greatest organizational perpetrators of junk science in modern times. […]
  • Fayette power plantSupreme Court Strikes Down EPA Rule Targeting Downwind Power Plant Pollution
    Jun 27, 2024
    The Supreme Court blocked an Environmental Protection Agency rule cracking down on power plant pollution. […]
  • protest climate justice riotClimate Lawfare: Using The Courts To Dictate And Enforce Green Energy Policies
    Jun 27, 2024
    Lawfare is becoming a key tactic of the climate cult because they can’t get their wish list enacted through the democratic process. […]
  • cattle cows livestockDenmark Rolls Out ‘Flatulence Tax’ For Livestock To Ostensibly Slash Methane Emissions
    Jun 27, 2024
    Starting in 2030, Danish livestock farmers will have to pay for the greenhouse gases their cows, sheep and pigs produce. […]
  • beach summer heatAn Expert’s Forecast Of Central Europe’s ‘Summer Of Hell’ Already Off-Track
    Jun 27, 2024
    A suspect biologist had predicted a 'summer of hell with almost complete certainty.' It hasn’t materialized yet. […]
  • harris eco adGreenwashing Kamala Harris: How The Veep Casts Herself As An Eco-Justice Crusader
    Jun 27, 2024
    Kamala Harris has long cast herself as a fearless pioneer of social and environmental justice. Her record shows something far different. […]
  • biden solar farmSolar Execs Who Gave Millions To Dems And Lobbied For Subsidies Are Swimming In Cash
    Jun 26, 2024
    Execs and investors in a solar company who donated heavily to Dems and lobbied for Biden’s big climate tax bill ended up as major winners when it passed. […]
  • power plant refineryWhat the Media Won’t Tell You About Fossil Fuels And The Green Energy Transition
    Jun 26, 2024
    Trillions of taxpayer dollars have been spent on a supposed 'green transition' that isn’t occurring at all. In fact, the opposite is happening. […]
  • jennifer granholmBiden DOE Farming Out Home Appliance Rules To Left-Wing Climate Activist Groups
    Jun 26, 2024
    Climate activist groups and far-left green groups helped craft the DOE's aggressive regulations targeting popular household appliances. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Portions © 2024 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Climate Change Dispatch