• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

China’s Coal Power Binge Escalates: Over 300 More Plants On The Way

by John Hayward
September 01, 2023, 12:06 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
10

china air pollution masksChina’s mad dash for coal power continues, even as Western governments tell their citizens to make more sacrifices for “climate change.”

A report from two energy research groups on Tuesday found China has over 300 more coal power plants in the works, issuing permits for another 52 gigawatts of coal power in just the first half of 2023 alone. [emphasis, links added]

The report from Global Energy Monitor (GEM) and the Center for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) said China doubled its commissions of coal plants in 2023, so if anything, China’s coal spree is accelerating.

The report noted that China takes a while to follow up on permits, with only about half of the plants that were permitted in 2022 under construction as of summer 2033.

The report said:

After the permitting spree of the past year, China now has 243 GW of coal-fired capacity currently permitted and under construction.

If the permitting rush is not stopped until projects that are currently announced or in pre-permit stages have gained permits as well, there will be a total of 392 GW of new coal-fired power capacity in the pipeline.

The climate change movement is usually very muted in its criticism of China, but over the past year, a few environmental organizations have begun noticing that Beijing’s coal rush is a sharp contrast to the rhetoric deployed at climate conferences.

The GEM/CREA report said it has now become effectively impossible for China to come close to its promises of peak carbon emissions in 2030 without wasting titanic sums of money by canceling many of the projects under construction.

China does not seem inclined to make any such sacrifices. In fact, the report found that China is now using coal for more than half of its electric power generation, and it is even building coal power plants in areas that do not appear to need more generator capacity:

Most of the new projects don’t meet the central government’s requirements for permitting new coal: the provinces building most new coal aren’t using it to “support” a correspondingly large buildout of clean energy; the majority of projects are in provinces that have no shortage of generating capacity to meet demand peaks; and most new project locations already have more than enough coal power to “support” existing and planned wind and solar capacity. This shows that there is no effective enforcement of the policies limiting new project permitting.

[…]

China now has 243 GW of coal power under construction and permitted. When projects currently announced or in the preparation stage but not yet permitted are included, this number rises to 392 GW. This means that coal power capacity could increase by 23% to 33% from 2022 levels, implying either a massive increase in coal power generation and emissions or a massive drop in plant utilization, implying financial losses and potentially asset stranding.

CREA lead analyst Lauri Myllyvirta clung to the rapidly dissipating hope that China still plans to keep those promises of peak carbon by 2030 and net zero emissions by 2050.

“The coal power spree is a last-minute push by China’s coal industry to lock in capacity and emissions before China’s emissions are due to peak late this decade. This is happening even as clean energy installations are rapidly expanding,” Myllyvirta told the South China Morning Post (SCMP) on Tuesday.

“As the world turns its back on new coal projects, China is making the path towards its energy transition and climate commitments more complicated and costly,” said GEM research analyst Flora Champenois, sounding a more pessimistic tone.

“Continuing to permit more coal capacity will either result in massive emissions increases or plants sitting idle, generating losses, and perpetuating the power system’s dependence on coal,” Champenois added.

The SCMP pointed out that according to the report, China is pumping out new coal plants in areas where there is no need for excess capacity to balance the installation of unreliable wind and solar power.

China often defends its coal spree by claiming it needs a surge of carbon-burning power capacity to accommodate the construction of more renewable energy plants, but that clearly is not true.

Another hope voiced by the climate change activists who scramble to make excuses for China is that local officials are ordering all these new coal plants without the knowledge of the central government, which is going to notice the coal spree any day now and order the rambunctious provincial governments to settle down.

The GEM/CREA report makes it increasingly difficult to believe in this fantasy, especially since the central Communist government is very much involved in digging, importing, and shipping the mountains of coal needed to fuel these plants.

Al Jazeera News noted that China, the world’s worst polluter by a wide margin, produces more emissions than the U.S., the European Union, and India combined, even as it builds “more solar power capacity than the entire rest of the world.”

China’s emissions increased by another ten percent last year.

Read rest at Breitbart

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024

Comments 10

  1. Sonnyhill says:
    3 years ago

    We don’t have the power to hold China to their commitments now and we won’t in 2030. They will not honour them. We’ll be so far behind them that we’ll answer to them.

    Reply
  2. David Lewis says:
    3 years ago

    It is rather telling that China is building more plants than their current needs, at least in some locations. They have committed to hitting a peek of their emissions in 2030. What is consistent with their actions is they will peak in their capacity by 2030, but will probably use more of the capacity after 2030.

    Reply
  3. Sonnyhill says:
    3 years ago

    The Conservative premier of Ontario, Doug Ford, has sounded the alarm on future shortages of electricity. We’ve been too comfortable, relying on Quebec’s hydroelectricity and our old nuclear reactors. The plan seems to be more natural gas turbo – generators and modular reactors placed beside existing nukes. Better hurry, immigrants need electricity, too.

    Reply
  4. Steve Bunten says:
    3 years ago

    China is showing what the rest of the world should be doing–deploying plants that use hydrocarbons to generate electricity. Coal for base power level and natural gas for marginal generation. But also we need to deploy new nuclear power plants that can be added to the base-level power.

    Reply
    • Col Harkin says:
      3 years ago

      Australia will be forced at some time to build new coal power stations because baseload will eventually be depleted to a point that the east coast will have ragular blackouts. Bowen’s renewables network won’t cope with demand 24/7 while batteries and the now infamous Snowy 2.0 do not generate electricity.

      The process we see unfolding is some coal plants are closing (Liddell, Hazelwood) others are set to close in a few years, BUT – there are no new plants of any type being constructed that can replace the output of the plants closing.

      24/7 electricity supply will no longer be available.

      This should be telling us something, but it seems to me that no one is thinking (say) ten years out when all of what I see comes to reality and actually happens.

      Reply
      • Steve Bunten says:
        3 years ago

        Col, they are not even thinking a week in advanced. My belief is that none of these people have a clue what it takes to run an electric grid and how much electricity is actually being consume while how little is produced by wind and solar. Batteries don’t create electricity but are a loss of energy as those are charged. But there is NO WAY that the number of batteries that theoretically would be needed could actually be manufactured (the minerals cannot be mined and processed to make them). Nor the additional capacity of wind and solar to charge those non-existing batteries.

        Reply
  5. SPURWING PLOVER says:
    3 years ago

    Okay now show us Chinas Carbon Footprint Gore and DiCaprio’s as well as the Eco-Freaks Carbon Footprints

    Reply
    • Sonnyhill says:
      3 years ago

      Has no one asked the question
      “What does Beijing see that Green governments don’t see?” China isn’t worried about carbon dioxide. I already know that socialists like Trudeau envy the Chinese government’s power to get things done. It seems that China wants to raise prosperity while Western socialists aim to slow us down. Is it that our governments believe that we have it TOO GOOD?

      Reply
      • David Lewis says:
        3 years ago

        In the 1970’s my parents had friends who thought that the middle class had it too good. Such people never voluntarily scale back their own standard of living. In the case of my parents friends they thought that the standard of living of the middle class should be reduced by more taxes.

        I’ll repeat what I stated in the past about China. A woman very close to their top leadership said they don’t believe climate change is a problem. They are just going along for political reasons.

        Reply
        • Steve Bunten says:
          3 years ago

          Of course the CCP doesn’t believe that whatever has changed in the climate (I haven’t really seen anything change of any significant amount) but as you say China is pretending to go along for political reasons. I would add that by pretending to go along they are getting the countries of the west (Europe, North America, Australia, …) to continue to destroy their economies by shutting down reliable energy sources (power plants, drilling for oil & natural gas) while going all in for wind, solar, EV, etc. Not only that but China is selling us that junk. To paraphrase a statement attributed to one of the Soviet leaders that we’ll buy the rope from China that they’ll use to hang us.

          Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Subscribe To CCD Via Email!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get instant notifications. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • canada forest protectedHow Canada’s ‘Green’ Forest Policies Are Making Wildfires Worse
    Jul 31, 2026
    Canada's 'green' forest policies are fueling bigger wildfires, more smoke, and higher costs, and Americans are paying the price. […]
  • Summer is still summer. Childhood is still childhood.NPR Turns Ordinary Summer Weather Into Climate Anxiety For Children
    Jul 31, 2026
    NPR turns ordinary summer weather into climate anxiety, using emotional anecdotes instead of evidence to convince children they're losing summer. […]
  • Marketing says Net Zero. Reality says natural gas powers AI.Big Tech’s Net Zero Fantasy Collides With AI Reality
    Jul 31, 2026
    Big Tech promised net zero by 2030, but AI data centers are driving emissions higher, exposing the gap between climate rhetoric and reality. […]
  • Britain sacrificed a great deal without changing the outcome.Britain’s Net Zero Crusade Changed Everything—Except the Climate
    Jul 31, 2026
    Britain's net zero crusade imposed huge economic costs while doing little for the climate. It's time to scrap net zero and adapt. […]
  • Human-caused "wildfires" happen far more often than those sparked by lightning or heat, officials say.Nine In Ten ‘Wildfires’ Started By Human Activity, French Government Admits
    Jul 30, 2026
    French officials reveal nine in ten wildfires are started by human activity, not climate change, as arsonists and careless individuals face prosecution. […]
  • clouds sun hotSolar Activity Is The Main Driver Of Earth’s Climate, Scientists Say
    Jul 30, 2026
    New research argues solar activity, not modern warming trends, is the dominant driver of Earth's climate. […]
  • AG dana nesselMichigan Legislature Rebukes State AG On Climate Lawsuit In Latest Budget
    Jul 30, 2026
    Michigan's new budget bars AG Dana Nessel from suing energy firms without legislative approval, a bipartisan rebuke of her climate lawsuit. […]
  • large solar farmMinnesota Wants ‘Clean’ Solar Energy — Built By Chinese Slave Labor
    Jul 29, 2026
    Minnesota's transition away from coal leans heavily on solar panels tied to forced labor in China's Xinjiang region. […]
  • uk direct air vacuumDirect Air Capture: Labour’s Maddest Net Zero Bet, Funded By Taxpayers
    Jul 29, 2026
    Days before leaving office, Ed Miliband committed the UK to becoming a global leader in direct air capture—at eye-watering cost. […]
  • Biden Bucks: How Green Energy Grants Fueled A Bonanza For State Outfits
    Jul 29, 2026
    Green groups, NGOs, and state agencies received huge federal handouts during Biden’s last two years to prop up flailing green energy boondoggles. […]

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Sunset on Net Zero

Canary in a Climate World

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky