• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

California Crazy: Don’t Charge Your Electric Vehicle During Heatwaves

by Anthony Watts
3 years ago
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
7

calif heat signCalifornia’s “green dream” of going to 100 percent electric vehicles by 2035 is hitting a major reality roadblock.

Last week, during a major heatwave, the California Independent System Operator (CAISO), the agency charged with managing the state’s electric grid, sent out a tweet suggesting electric car owners shouldn’t be charging their electric vehicles.

In the accompanying media release, CAISO had this to say: [emphasis mine]

“…grid operators again ask the public to conserve electricity to help balance supply and demand on the grid and avoid service disruptions due to extreme heat across much of the Southwest.”

“To be as comfortable as possible during the Flex Alert hours, consumers are also strongly encouraged to take these steps earlier in the day:

…

Pre-charge electronic devices · Close window coverings to keep your home or apartment cool · Pre-charge electric vehicles”

That’s right, you should NOT charge your electric vehicles during a heatwave in California. Why? Because, like the power supply system in many third-world countries, California’s electric power generators can’t deliver enough electricity to CAISO to meet demand.

Even Tesla got into the act, pushing this message out to Internet-connected Tesla interior LCD screens during last year’s August heatwave:

“The current heatwave is impacting the grid in California. If possible, we ask that you reduce Supercharging and home charging between the hours of 4pm and 9pm to support the statewide efforts to manage demand.”

“Additionally, proactive utility shutoffs may limit charging options.”

Meanwhile, in Sacramento, the Governor, legislators, and regulators still think electric vehicles are vital to California’s plan to reduce emissions over the next two decades.

In 2020, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, by executive fiat, set 2035 as a target date for ending the sale of gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles as the way to fight “climate change” in the state.

At the same time, California has been looking to expand electric vehicle ownership and make charging stations more accessible.

California suffers from an electric grid problem because the state has eschewed reliable fossil fuels in favor of unreliable green energy, such as wind and solar power.

This presents a problem because such sources don’t work when the wind stagnates during heat waves, or at night when there’s no sunlight.

Simultaneously, the state is exacerbating this problem, creating ever more demand for electricity by promoting electric vehicles and shutting down access to natural gas appliances.

Deliberately redesigning the state’s electric grid from one that historically supplied power 24 hours a day, seven days a week, regardless of the weather, to one that can only supply power reliably when weather conditions are Goldilocks-like “just right,” was foolish; political malpractice, if you will.

Last year, California’s electric grid came within minutes of collapse due to heavy loads at the same time solar power slumped at sunset.

On August 17, during the CAISO Board of Governors Meeting, CAISO President Steve Berber let loose with this bit of reality. From transcript:

“You are trading the loss of 3,000 megawatts for the collapse of the entire system of California and perhaps the entire West. … When you’re at the very edge and you have a contingency and you have no operating reserves, you risk entire system collapse.”

Nothing has changed significantly since then, so power shortfalls, perhaps even more severe than last summer’s, are likely to occur again this summer. That’s a sobering thought.

California has traded energy security to kneel before the false prophet of green energy. Instead of using reliable and affordable coal, natural gas, and nuclear power plants, they are increasingly relying on intermittent and unreliable industrial wind and solar facilities.

The people of California, and perhaps the West in general, may pay the price for that homage if the power grid collapses during the ongoing heatwave.

A new heatwave looms on the horizon this week, even bigger than the one last week. This alert from the Sacramento National Weather Service Office tells the story.

National Weather Service Sacramento CA

147 PM PDT Wed Jun 23 2021

…Dangerous and long duration heatwave to impact the northern

and central Sacramento Valley…

Triple digit heat will return to northern California as early as Friday with further warming through the weekend with highs of 105 to 114 degrees.

The key phrase is “long duration event” and the key number is 114 degrees. And guess what? Lithium-Ion batteries should not be charged at such high temperatures, as they risk going into thermal runaways and are nearly impossible to extinguish the fire.

As for the grid, with that heatwave looming, renewables, more appropriately called “unreliables,” will once again be tested. California’s green dream may very well be a bunch of electric vehicle owners that can’t get a charge.

The poor and lower-middle class, the people least likely to be able to afford California’s expensive power, or those who have no power due to the likely rolling blackouts to keep the grid from collapsing, will suffer the most.

Of course, the media will blame the heatwave on “climate change” while at the same time giving a collective shrug as to why electric vehicles are found on the road with dead batteries, while vehicles with internal combustion engines continue to reliably deliver people to their homes, shopping, and places of business.

Read more at Climate Realism

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Truth
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Del
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki iconOdnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • Yummly
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related

Next Post

New York Has Absolutely No Idea How To 'Decarbonize' Its Power Grid

Comments 7

  1. Steve Bunten says:
    3 years ago

    Sorry Californians, you are finding out what electing all these “progressives” are doing to your state. Will you wake up and vote them out of office and elect people who will change directions, adding real power plants, stop shutting down your last nuke plant, get rid of mandates for electric cars, etc.

  2. Ralph says:
    3 years ago

    California’s situation makes me glad I live in Florida. With the threat of hurricanes it would be impossible for Florida to go 100% renewable. One hurricane hit like Irma in 2017, the hurricane that went up the spine of the state, would wreck Florida’s economy for months if not years.

  3. David Lewis says:
    3 years ago

    I know some media will say that 114 degree heat is unprecedented and therefore proof of climate change so I’ll post what I have in the past. In the 1970’s I drove through the Sacramental Valley when it was 120 degrees. I left Klamath Falls at an elevation of 4100 feet when it was 71 degrees and I was wearing a long sleeve shirt. My car had excellent air conditioning but at the time most cars did not. At a rest stop it seemed as if everyone was staring at me. I finally realized it was the long sleeve shirt. The women had shed their tops and were only wearing their bras above the waist.

    If someone set out to deliberately design a power grid that would fail they would design the California power grid in its present form. Perhaps failure was their goal. They are shutting down reliable power such as fossil fuel. They are relying more on wind, which is typically fails in the stagnant air of heat waves, and solar which fails every night. Then they add the load of electric cars. California is a very liberal state and liberals don’t learn well from their mistakes. Things will have to get very bad before they replace their leaders.

    • Sonnyhill says:
      3 years ago

      Most of the EPA regulations on American kvehicles are derived from CARB, the California Air Research Board.
      The Los Angeles basin 50 years ago was filled with smog, a local problem that may have been alleviated by mass transit. NOBODY walks in LA. The California market for cars was so big that Detroit decided to build cars that satisfied California’s demands, rather than a California version and a 49-state version. This emboldened the Ralph Nader’s out there.
      Does Los Angeles have a mass transit system today? The tail is wagging the dog. Same as it ever was, same as it ever was.

  4. Sonnyhill says:
    3 years ago

    Will it come to pass that EV’s will be used as the electrical grid’s back – ups? You get in your car and it’s dead cuz Sacramento’s lights were blinking? The governor’s face was leaking brine?

  5. Dale Horst says:
    3 years ago

    The simple minded have come full circle.

  6. Dave O says:
    3 years ago

    Don’t plug in your battery car in the day or if it has been sitting out in the sun. The car will heat up really hot even if the outside temp well below 100°F and it liable to experience the loveable thermal runaway and subsequent fire. Just another convenience for owning the latest technology.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • newsom debate june 24Newsom Jets To DC To ‘Stand With’ Biden Amid Wildfire Emergency, Foregoes Virtual Meeting
    Jul 5, 2024
    After declaring a state of emergency over statewide wildfires, Newsom jetted to DC instead of meeting virtually as other governors did. […]
  • ev charging expoThe 500,000 Nationwide EV Charger Network Is A $7.5 Billion Charade
    Jul 5, 2024
    The 500,000 charging stations will cost the government $400 billion, not the $7.5 billion the President has promised. […]
  • wheat harvestIgnore The Climate Crisis Hype: Humanity Is Thriving Thanks To Fossil Fuels
    Jul 5, 2024
    Climate crisis? Thanks to fossil fuels, very few times in history have seen such rapid progress as the period from the mid-20th century to now. […]
  • electric car charging stationEnergy, Business Groups Urge Supreme Court To Halt California’s EV Mandate For All Americans
    Jul 5, 2024
    Numerous trade groups are asking the Supremes to review a lower court’s decision that allows California to push electric vehicles on the entire U.S. […]
  • Keir Starmer rallyAs Brits Struggle With Net Zero Costs, Labour Plans To Accelerate Unpopular Green Schemes
    Jul 3, 2024
    Fast-tracking Net Zero will hike energy bills, smother the economy, and spark an almighty backlash. And Labour is promising just that. […]
  • city underwaterMeteorologist Exposes How Media Is Hyping NOAA’s ‘Computer-Modeled’ Sea Level Scare
    Jul 3, 2024
    Hyperbolic predictions on New York City and sea level rise have been around for decades, and not one has come true or shown they will. […]
  • bavaria germanyJune 2024 German Weather Was Close To Normal, No ‘Hellish Summer’ In Sight
    Jul 3, 2024
    June in the Central European region was highly variable with periods of both cool and summery weather. In other words, no hellish summer in sight. […]
  • biden DC Emergency Operations CenterBiden Calls Climate Skeptics ‘Really, Really Dumb’, Announces WH Summit On Summer Heat
    Jul 3, 2024
    When Biden spoke at the D.C. Emergency Operations Center, he called Americans 'really, really dumb' for doubting his climate alarmist rhetoric. […]
  • hurricane berylAs Hurricane Beryl Swirls, Media Push Climate-Fueled Nonsense
    Jul 2, 2024
    The press and some meteorologists are saying that climate change is 'fueling' an historic Hurricane Beryl. Evidence says otherwise. […]
  • protest fight climate changeClimate Activists Have Embraced A Crazy New Goal: Abolish Fossil Fuels With Lawfare
    Jul 2, 2024
    After failing with consumers, businesses, and at the ballot box, climate nutters are using the courts to end fossil fuels. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Portions © 2024 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Climate Change Dispatch