From reading the left-wing media, you know (or think you know) that there is an energy “transition” going on. This is something that must happen as a matter of urgent necessity. [emphasis, links added]
Vast government subsidies are being disbursed to ensure its rapid success. Fossil fuels are rapidly on the way out, while wind and solar are quickly taking over.
For example, you may well have seen the big piece last August in the New York Times, headlined: “The Clean Energy Future Is Arriving Faster Than You Think.”
Across the country, a profound shift is taking place … The nation that burned coal, oil and gas for more than a century to become the richest economy on the planet, as well as historically the most polluting, is rapidly shifting away from fossil fuels.
But if you read that piece, or any one of dozens of others from the Times or other “mainstream” sources, what you won’t find are meaningful statistics on the extent to which fossil fuel use is declining, if at all, or the extent to which renewables like wind and solar are replacing them.
That’s why the Manhattan Contrarian turns instead to dry statistical data to try to get the real story.
Several years ago I discovered an annual book of energy data called the Statistical Review of World Energy. At the time, the Statistical Review was produced by the international oil company BP.
I first covered one of these Reviews in this post from July 2019. A couple of years ago BP decided to get out of this business and turned the product over to something called the Energy Institute (EI).
EI then produced a Statistical Review in June 2023 (covering 2022), and is out now on June 20, 2024, with a Statistical Review covering 2023.
Most of the Statistical Review consists of just spreadsheets of numbers. There are some charts, but relatively few. But the takeaways are too obvious to hide.
The big one is this: there is no energy “transition” going on, at least not in the sense that “renewables” are actually supplanting fossil fuels.
Yes, there is a considerable amount of “renewable” wind and solar electricity generation getting built (with huge government subsidies). But it is not replacing fossil fuel generation.
Rather, fossil fuel generation continues to increase, and its share of overall energy production has barely budged.
Here is EI’s June 20 Press Release, which summarizes the five “key stories” that it says emerge from the statistics. The first one is the big one — increasing energy consumption led by increased production and consumption of fossil fuels:
Record global energy consumption, with coal and oil pushing fossil fuels and their emissions to record levels. Global primary energy consumption overall was at a record absolute high, up 2% on the previous year to 620 Exajoules (EJ). Global fossil fuel consumption reached a record high, up 1.5% to 505 EJ (driven by coal up 1.6%, oil up 2% to above 100 million barrels for the first time, while gas was flat). As a share of the overall mix they were at 81.5%, marginally down from 82% last year.
And of course, “emissions” continue to rise:
Emissions from energy increased by 2%, exceeding 40 gigatonnes of CO2 for the first time.
No matter how much the federal government or any state threatens to punish you for your sin of fossil fuel use, aggregate global emissions from such use are not going to go down within our lifetimes.
The second “key story” relates to the contribution, or lack thereof, of solar and wind. Here EI engages in some modest spinning to make things look less bad than they are for the solar and wind promoters, but there’s not much they can do:
Solar and wind push global renewable electricity generation to another record level. Renewable generation, excluding hydro, was up 13% to a record high of 4,748 TWh. This growth was driven almost entirely by wind and solar, and accounted for 74% of all net additional electricity generated.
4,748 TWh of renewable generation — wow, that’s a lot! Or is it?
Do you notice how they suddenly switched units from Exajoules to Terawatt hours when they changed from talking about fossil fuels to solar and wind?
Does anybody around here know the conversion factor? Yes — it’s 277.778 TWh per EJ. That means that the 4,748 TWh of “almost entirely” solar and wind power generated in 2023 came to all of 17.1 EJ, which is just 2.7% of the 620 EJ of world primary energy consumption.
Could you have imagined that it could be so little, after decades of over-the-top promotion and trillions of dollars of subsidies?
And pay attention to that line “wind and solar … accounted for 74% of all net additional electricity generated.” Does that somehow sound like a transition is happening? It’s the opposite.
If wind and solar were truly taking over, they would have to account for 100% of additional generation, plus large further amounts to replace fossil fuel generators.
As long as wind and solar account for less than all of the additional generation, then fossil fuels are continuing to increase, and there is no “transition” going on at all.
I mentioned that there were relatively few charts in the Review, but some of them are striking. Here is one of my favorites, showing global coal consumption from 1965 to 2023:
Over that period, North America and Europe have cut their consumption almost by half, from almost 40 EJ per year to around 20.
But over the same period, the consumption by the rest of the world has gone from about 20 EJ to around 140, multiplying by a factor of 7.
And don’t be fooled by the apparent leveling off of increases in total consumption in the last several years. That reflects continuing decreases in North America and Europe, which are more than offset by larger increases in the Asia Pacific region.
Robert Bryce at his Substack has many more details from the EI Statistical Review, plus several charts that he has created from the EI data. He is much better at creating charts than I am. The title of Bryce’s article is “Numbers Don’t Lie.”
Bryce also has a figure for the amount of government subsidies that have gone to wind and solar generation since 2004: $4.7 trillion. That much money to fund a supposed “transition” that isn’t occurring at all.
The story is going to be effectively the same every year until finally, the promoters give up on the wind/solar scam.
Top photo by Wolfgang Hasselmann on Unsplash
Read more at Manhattan Contrarian
Not sure they will give up on their “Religion”unfortunately.
Frankly the Just Stop Oil/Leave it in the Ground Useful idiots should quit using anything to do with Fossil Fuels and t hat includes the Transportation of those products it should shock the hell out of those Nit-Wits
And what about the 600M who consume ‘traditional biomass’ as the racist lefties call it. That’s dung, cane stalks, your local woodland. Somewhere on WHATSUP Willis Eschenbach noted that it produced three times the global energy than all the panels and windmills. Where is it here?
Golly doc.witch says 14 to 15% of global energy!! Beats windmills by miles! Why don’t we know more about this? Count those dying from lung disease, Just Stop Oil, you murderes