That’s right, last week a panel, made up of four pompous linguists and one journalist, chose “climate hysteria” as Germany’s taboo word (un-word) of 2019.
Discriminatory, disguising or misleading
The Unwort des Jahres (un-word of the year) is a new or recently popularized term used in Germany which a panel deems “violates human rights or infringes upon Democratic principles.”
According to Wikipedia, “The term may be one that discriminates against societal groups or might be euphemistic, disguising or misleading. The term is usually, but not always, a German term. The term is chosen from suggestions sent in by the public.”
Over the years, like so many other institutions, the volunteer panel has leaned to the left and has been choosing words that tend to cast conservatives and the right political spectra in a negative light.
The panel’s announcement of the un-word of the year gets broad media coverage.
Last week, the panel selected “climate hysteria” as the un-word of the year.
Taboo because it “defames climate protection efforts”
According to Wikipedia, the panel – which has no scientific expert on it at all, chose “climate (change) hysteria” as the un-word of 2019 because it “defames climate protection efforts and the climate protection movement, and discredits important discussions about climate protection.”
Climate-science dissent is no longer welcome, the panel wants to tell us.
According to Wikipedia:
The expression [climate hysteria] was used by many in politics, economics, and the media in 2019 – by the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung as well as by entrepreneurs and especially by politicians of the Alternative for Germany party. It dismisses the increased commitment to climate protection as some kind of collective psychosis.
Moreover, in light of scientific findings regarding climate change, this word is misleading and irresponsibly supports anti-scientific tendencies.”
Yet, thankfully, some media have grown critical of the panel of volunteer linguists and single journalist, and all the media attention it gets. For example, the Bild newspaper wrote:
As if it were the decision of an important institution, the decision of a privately organised group is reported: Four linguists and a journalist who volunteer once a year to play linguistic police. According to the motto: Listen up, citizens, the language committee has decided, this word is taboo from now on!
Ironically, in 2011 the panel chose “alternativlos” (no alternative) as the un-word of 2010 in politics because they claimed it was “undemocratic,” as any discussion on a subject “would be deemed unnecessary or undesirable.”
Today the panel appears to have forgotten about that earlier choice.
In any case, skeptics and dissenters should instead ramp up the use of the term “climate hysteria” to describe the FFF and XR movements, and all the nutty doomsday scientists who like telling us there’s no alternative to decarbonization.
Read more at No Tricks Zone
At the end of a long life exploring the human condition and human soul and modern humanity in search of a soul, Jung warned of coming psychic epidemics, “groupthink” hysteria. We are seeing it now, distressed and disturbed school kids, fanaticsm about AGW, apocalyptic fears, and of course the hysterical political correctness which seeks to suppress opinion. We are required to conform to the current PC groupthink. Just what Jung warned us about.
If Jung had foreseen the internet, he could have predicted when the hysteria would begin.
It should be noted that the Nazis were very very Green Hitler was a Vegan the nazis had plans to Green all the places in Europe they had captured Hitlerwas in to pagan eastern mystisicm the same stuff the Eco-Wackos of today are into
I would like to thank the Unwort des Jahres people for bringing a very useful word to my attention that I’ll use often. Like always, it is the climate change activists that are the architects of the very thing that they object to. By making statements that the human race is going end, we are at the beginning of a major extinction event, and that we only have ten years to save the planet, the alarmists are practicing ‘Climate Hysteria’. The fact that the word is so accurate is probably the reason it has become “Unwort des Jahres.”
This is another censorship effort in Germany. With their history I would think they would know better.
I have just been made aware of a case where ‘Climate Hysteria’ can be legitimate. In a region where snow happens but isn’t that common kids were sledding and playing after a heavy snow storm. They were drinking lots of hot chocolate. Panic set in when the local store ran out of milk.
The reason why it is called climate hysteria and why it needs to be called climate hysteria in the future as well is that it actually IS climate hysteria. Calling things by their correct name is precisely what one needs to to – Orwellian crypto-Marxist attempts to control language have to be resisted at every opportunity.