Global warming alarmists can’t stand debate. Anyone who disagrees with their theory that humans cause global warming/climate change is called a denier and told to shut up.
Not one of us who questions the theory that humans, fossil fuels, and CO2 cause warming (or climate change, if you will) has ever said that the climate is constant and has never changed, so calling us “deniers” is a bald-faced lie.
Tuesday, that brilliant climate scientist John Kerry was at it again. He penned an op-ed in the Washington Post saying that President Trump should disband his “Climate denial Panel:”
Many have become immune or anesthetized to the daily assault on truth that is the Trump presidency, an alternative reality where North Korea has denuclearized and Russia might not have attacked our elections in 2016. It would be laughable were it not dangerous. Presidents are supposed to hold consensus together, not invent fictions to fray it.
But the administration’s most dangerous collision with facts has been its effort to paralyze U.S. efforts to join the nations of the world in confronting climate change.
The White House plans to convene “experts” to “determine” whether climate change is a national security threat. We know what the outcome will be: President Trump’s council of doubters and deniers will convene to undo a 26-year-old factual consensus that climate change is a national-security threat multiplier.
How dare Trump bring in scientists who disagree with the indoctrination?
People writing in the Washington Post have been spewing forth this climate change alarmism for a very long time. In 1922, they essentially predicted the same garbage as they have predicted for the last approximately forty years. Snopes.com dug up the 1922 article:
The Arctic ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from Consulafft, at Bergen, Norway.
Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes.
Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm. Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared
The predictions were 100% wrong in 1922 as the ice came back, and so far, they have been wrong now. But somehow, being wrong so consistently allows them to say the science is settled.
The only reason they get away without being questioned about their bad previous predictions is that almost all journalists just repeat what they are told with no questions.
It is too bad that journalists won’t question John Kerry and other fear mongers, but here are a few easy ones for them:
- How come the ice is still in the Arctic after 150 years of exponential growth in fossil fuel use, since we were told it would be gone by now?
- What caused the ice to melt after the ice age since humans and fossil fuels couldn’t have caused it?
- We have been warned that because humans and fossil fuels cause warming, we would have snowless winters. Why were the predictions so wrong and why should we believe the doom and gloom about the future since previous predictions have been 100% wrong?
- Scientific studies have shown that droughts were much longer in the past prior to when humans and fossil fuels could have caused them, so why do climate change alarmists continually lie that we cause longer and more severe droughts? Isn’t that a daily assault on the truth?
There are thousands of questions, and it is sad that no one asks the alarmists. It is obvious that the climate has always and always will change naturally, and it is arrogant to believe politicians and bureaucrats can control temperatures, sea levels, and storm activity forever. They just want the money to control her lives.
It is no wonder that twenty-nine-year-old Ocasio-Cortez believes this garbage since she has been indoctrinated with it her entire life.
She actually tells young people that maybe they shouldn’t have children because she believes the nonsense she has been told.
Since she believes what journalists and others have taught her, she and others have come up with what can best be described as an abjectly ignorant Green New Deal that would absolutely destroy our economy.
Russia would certainly be happy to have politicians destroy America. They would love to have people like Kerry, Hillary, Pelosi, Schumer, and AOC in charge instead of Trump.
Read more at American Thinker
Kerry don’t want to debate this crack-pot theory of Global Warming/Climate Change because he don’ t want to be proven to be a liar and Globalist who has rubbed elbows with traitors like Jane Fonda just like Al Gore wont debate his crack-pot theory he rakes in money through the sales of all his fake documentries and junk science books
You can’t debate global warming with liberals. There are two different realities here. Anti-global warming fraud folks are arguing that the current weather is normal and just like what we’ve experienced many times in the past. Global warming advocates are arguing the global warming fraud is necessary to redistribute the world’s (meaning U.S.) wealth and destroying capitalism, making the U.S. a socialist state answering only to United Nations.
AO-C probably doesn’t believe in natural climate variability. She should be asked.
Why do activists exclude the human race from “the natural world”. We’re part of it. The sun’s cycles, volcanoes, El Nino’s and La Nina’s,etc, all affect climate.
Why do they fear a warmer climate ? The human race flocks to it.
Oh Lurch pack it in . They don’t want a debate they want compliance to their socialist /globalist agenda .
They need a new source of cash as the other ones are already spoken for .
Ta Da…. a massive carbon tax sent to left wing fruit cakes so they can further undermine democracies with their own money . Who said they were stupid ?
What would MSM gain by being under state control ? How free is MSM in
China , North Korea and Russia ? Not .
Most of this is the MSM now selling the product / idealogy and political goals of their billionaire owners . The more low paid slaves they have the bigger their pile of cash . Wouldn’t it be even better if the child labor they use is in the country they sell their crap ?
Over 90% of “journalists” donations go to Democrats .No conflict there .
This is the same Nit-Wit who called Air Conditioners a bigger threat then the Terrorists Talk about DUMB
Lurch Kerry is dumb as a post. The only smart thing he has ever done in his life was to marry a billionaire ketchup maker. And he married her because he thought she was beautiful. So not so smart after all. As for his global warming rubbish he doesn’t even believe it. It’s a ll about money, power, control. 12,000 years ago my house would have had a mile thick ice sheet on top of it. All that ice melted before we started using fossil fuels. Before we even started burning “Right Whale” oil. Maybe there were more cows back then. It’s the damned COWS!!!!!
This article has one error. It is true that in the early 1920’s the world, and especially the Arctic, was much warmer. However, this is strong evidence against the climate change theory. This warming was before the carbon dioxide concentration was supposed to be high enough to significantly impact the climate. On top of that, the Arctic cooled again. This shows the existence natural cycles not controlled by mankind’s emissions.
I would not agree to fight a profession boxer for a simple reason. I would lose! That is why John Kerry and other alarmists refuse to debate climate change. The facts are against them.
The few debates that I have heard of has had the climate realists presenting facts and the alarmists presenting scary predictions.
The Earth has survived uncountable calamities, over eons, yet here we are in a sweet spot that humanity shall not tamper with. Huh!
How sad is it that science is now run by politicians? No discussion, no fact checking, answer questions with vague statements, and have political agenda.
This is what we have become. Money talks, money fuels research but only the right kind of research. It’s 1984 come to life.