• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Why Do Democrats Keep Getting Their Climate Doomsday Predictions Wrong?

by Varun Hukeri
3 years ago
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
4

sea rise disasterFor more than 50 years, members of the scientific community and environmental movement have made climate-change predictions that ultimately turned out to be incorrect.

Many of these predictions have been embraced by prominent Democrats over the years.

President Joe Biden’s climate czar John Kerry is the latest Democrat to promote predictions of impending global disaster. He said during an appearance last week on “CBS This Morning” that the world only has nine years left to avert a climate catastrophe.

That number was based on a 2018 projection that global temperature increases would become irreversible by 2030.

There is a scientific consensus that points to climate change and the contributing role of human activity.

But what remains unclear is the extent to which human activity contributes to climate change and whether the level of emissions is a “proven threat,” according to the Heartland Institute.

The Biden administration is proposing aggressive climate reforms with the goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. But lingering questions about climate change and the lengthy track record of incorrect predictions from Democrats and environmentalists could make it difficult for the administration to sell its agenda.

“Democrats have been getting their predictions so wrong for 30 years because they don’t understand climate science,” Heartland Institute vice president Jim Lakely said in a statement to the Daily Caller.

Competitive Enterprise Institute environmental director Myron Ebell and former Trump transition team member Steve Milloy compiled 27 instances of incorrect climate predictions by Democrats and scientists over 50 years in a report last December.

One such prediction was made by the former vice president and prominent climate activist Al Gore in 2009, who had suggested during a United Nations climate conference that the polar ice cap over the Arctic Ocean would disappear by 2014, USA Today reported.

Another report published last year by Milloy compiled 10 instances of incorrect climate predictions that were supposed to take place in 2020.

A prediction made by the U.S. Geological Survey in 2009 during the Obama administration claimed glaciers in Montana’s Glacier National Park would disappear entirely by 2020. The agency later took back its prediction in 2017 and began removing signs that warned of melting glaciers, CNN reported last year.

“One need only go to Glacier National Park and view the locations where the Obama administration maintained signs saying the glaciers would be gone by 2020,” Heartland Institute president James Taylor said in a statement to the Caller. “The signs are gone, the glaciers are still there.”

One reason why climate change predictions are consistently incorrect could be because the climate models and data such predictions rely on are often exaggerated or misrepresented.

A 2018 peer-reviewed study published in the American Meteorological Society’s scientific journal concluded that climate models can exaggerate the climate change impact from emissions by as much as 45%.

“The predictions made by global climate models of the future global mean temperature have been falsified by the data,” Ebell said in a statement to the Caller. “Continuing reliance on the models is not science, it’s propaganda.”

“Aside from the fact that Earth’s climate is far too complicated to be predicted to the degree of accuracy claimed by climate alarmists, they base their work on exaggerations of carbon dioxide’s effect on global warming,” CO2 Coalition executive director Greg Wrightstone said in a statement to the Caller.

Democrats and environmentalists today continue to promote the study warning of a potential climate catastrophe in 2030.

New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortezclaimed the “world is gonna end in 12 years” during an event in 2019. Swedish activist Greta Thunberg has used the study to advocate for aggressive climate action.

“Self-anointed ‘climate experts’ get their predictions wrong because the predictions are not scientific in nature,” Milloy told the Caller. “They wrongly imagine their predictions are science. They’re not. Until our ‘climate experts’ develop a track record of being correct, no attention should be paid to them.”

Read more at Daily Caller

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Truth
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Del
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki iconOdnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • Yummly
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related

Next Post

The REAL Threats To Threatened Species

Comments 4

  1. Gumnut says:
    3 years ago

    A sixteen-year-old is suing the Australian government, as one of a group of teens assisted by an elderly nun, for failing to act on climate change.

    The girl is concerned that coal usage will harm her relatives back in India. The idea of many Indians not having electricity does not seem to bother her much at all.

    Maybe she believes every word of the climate change videos she’s been watching for half of her life. If so, the possibility that renewables won’t power the Indian poor out of poverty probably won’t occur to her. Neither will the possibility that the climate claims of these videos could be scaremongering.

    Indeed, the veracity of doomsday predictions do not seem to matter much. Righting the record once a claim is proven to be false simply does not happen. Fact-checking may be all the rage these days, but it is merely a propaganda tool, and is thus indistinguishable from the alarmist material itself.

    No doubt, this girl has been inspired by Greta Thunberg. Maybe she would be better off being inspired by Galileo.

  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    3 years ago

    You would half to fire Biden would hire that screwball John Kerry as his climate Czar after all Kerry has thing against Air Conditioners I mean Biden just has to stop by the Nut House for the members of his Cabinet

  3. Chaamjamal says:
    3 years ago

    Maybe the get their predictions from the UN
    https://wp.me/pTN8Y-6ux

  4. Dave of Reedy Creek, Qld. Aus. says:
    3 years ago

    An interesting article that leaves me with a few questions, One: has any extreme predictions ever come to pass? I have followed Global Cooling/Global Warming/Climate Change/Climate Emergency for a long time and have not really ever heard of one of those Doomsday events taking place. Two: I am formerly from the New England area of NSW which has fairly frosty mornings in winter and blistering hot days in summer. In our town of Inverell we had summer temperatures in 1994 of 43 to 45C degrees that have “disappeared” over time, yet my family and I lived those days. In the winter of 1984 we had a frost of -13C. yet it has “disappeared too! Funny thing though, even if records ‘disappear’ we survived the massive temperature shift in our hometown. That is a swing of 53C; yet we survived. I think the cold killed some small animals but most survived. Now they are having mass hysteria over 1 or 2 degrees change and some extra plant food in the air. They are really having us on!

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • newsom debate june 24Newsom Jets To DC To ‘Stand With’ Biden Amid Wildfire Emergency, Foregoes Virtual Meeting
    Jul 5, 2024
    After declaring a state of emergency over statewide wildfires, Newsom jetted to DC instead of meeting virtually as other governors did. […]
  • ev charging expoThe 500,000 Nationwide EV Charger Network Is A $7.5 Billion Charade
    Jul 5, 2024
    The 500,000 charging stations will cost the government $400 billion, not the $7.5 billion the President has promised. […]
  • wheat harvestIgnore The Climate Crisis Hype: Humanity Is Thriving Thanks To Fossil Fuels
    Jul 5, 2024
    Climate crisis? Thanks to fossil fuels, very few times in history have seen such rapid progress as the period from the mid-20th century to now. […]
  • electric car charging stationEnergy, Business Groups Urge Supreme Court To Halt California’s EV Mandate For All Americans
    Jul 5, 2024
    Numerous trade groups are asking the Supremes to review a lower court’s decision that allows California to push electric vehicles on the entire U.S. […]
  • Keir Starmer rallyAs Brits Struggle With Net Zero Costs, Labour Plans To Accelerate Unpopular Green Schemes
    Jul 3, 2024
    Fast-tracking Net Zero will hike energy bills, smother the economy, and spark an almighty backlash. And Labour is promising just that. […]
  • city underwaterMeteorologist Exposes How Media Is Hyping NOAA’s ‘Computer-Modeled’ Sea Level Scare
    Jul 3, 2024
    Hyperbolic predictions on New York City and sea level rise have been around for decades, and not one has come true or shown they will. […]
  • bavaria germanyJune 2024 German Weather Was Close To Normal, No ‘Hellish Summer’ In Sight
    Jul 3, 2024
    June in the Central European region was highly variable with periods of both cool and summery weather. In other words, no hellish summer in sight. […]
  • biden DC Emergency Operations CenterBiden Calls Climate Skeptics ‘Really, Really Dumb’, Announces WH Summit On Summer Heat
    Jul 3, 2024
    When Biden spoke at the D.C. Emergency Operations Center, he called Americans 'really, really dumb' for doubting his climate alarmist rhetoric. […]
  • hurricane berylAs Hurricane Beryl Swirls, Media Push Climate-Fueled Nonsense
    Jul 2, 2024
    The press and some meteorologists are saying that climate change is 'fueling' an historic Hurricane Beryl. Evidence says otherwise. […]
  • protest fight climate changeClimate Activists Have Embraced A Crazy New Goal: Abolish Fossil Fuels With Lawfare
    Jul 2, 2024
    After failing with consumers, businesses, and at the ballot box, climate nutters are using the courts to end fossil fuels. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Portions © 2024 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Climate Change Dispatch