• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Study: No Evidence Ocean Acidification Harms Coral Reef Fish Behavior

by Dr. Craig Idso
March 10, 2020, 1:06 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
3

coral reef fishPaper Reviewed: Clark, T.D., Raby, G.D., Roche, D.G., Binning, S.A., Speers-Roesch, B., Jutfelt, F. and Sundin, J. 2020. Ocean acidification does not impair the behavior of coral reef fishes. Nature 577: 370-375.

In an incredibly important and revealing paper published in the journal Nature, Clark et al. (2020) write that “establishing a robust and independently replicated database of the effects of ocean acidification on fishes is essential to gain a reliable understanding of the consequences of climate change on marine ecosystems.”

Such a database, they add, is critical “before drawing broad conclusions and implementing management measures.”

Unfortunately, too many have been far too eager to jump to conclusions when it comes to estimating the impacts of ocean acidification.

And in this regard, Clark et al. note that “a number of highly publicized studies have reported detrimental effects of elevated CO2 levels on the sensory systems and behaviors of fishes, with coral reef fishes appearing to be the most sensitive despite experiencing large daily and seasonal fluctuations in nature (for example, 100-1,300 µatm).”

Such projected detrimental effects include “alterations in olfaction, hearing, vision, learning, behavioral lateralization, activity levels, boldness, anxiety, and susceptibility to predation,” which have led to “dire predictions for fish populations and marine ecosystems.”

But how solid is this body of research?

Clark et al. note there are two important red flags that call the pessimistic ocean acidification projections of fish into question.

First, fish are well-known for having robust acid-base regulatory systems that help them maintain tissue pH, even under extreme partial pressure levels of CO2 (pCO2) that exceed end-of-century pCO2 forecasts by 15 times (i.e., 15,000 µatm).

Second, they note that there are “substantial disparities [in published ocean acidification impacts] among studies and species, even when methodological approaches are similar.”

And so, to address these concerns, the team of seven scientists “commenced a three-year research program in 2014 to quantify the effects of end-of-century ocean acidification on the sensory and behavioral ecology of coral reef fishes.”

In doing so, they replicated and built upon “some of the most prominent studies in this field to understand the diversity in behavioral responses within and across species.”

Furthermore, they raised the bar and enhanced the transparency of their work by fully documenting their methods and providing raw data to the public so that their work could be easily replicated by others.

And what did their work reveal?

Their study focused on three main research of ocean acidification research on fish: (1) chemical cues from predators, (2) activity levels and (3) behavioral lateralization.

With respect to chemical cues, Clark et al. “quantified the effects of elevated CO2 on predator cue avoidance across three consecutive years in 560 individuals from six species of pomacentrid coral reef fishes.”

Results of this segment of their analysis revealed that “none of the coral reef fishes that we examined exhibited attraction to predator cues when acclimated to high CO2 levels, in contrast to previous reports on the same and other species.”

Furthermore, they used statistical procedures to compare their data with prior datasets and found that “the [negative] results reported previously for coral reef fishes are highly improbable (probability of 0 out of 10,000)…show[ing] no evidence of CO2 effects on chemical cue avoidance.”

With respect to activity levels, Clark et al. note that prior studies indicate there is up to a 90-fold increase in activity in coral reef fishes exposed to end-of-century CO2 levels.

However, they report “most activity measurements (for example, distances moved) from coral reef fishes have not used video footage but have been made using direct manual observations” that are subjective in nature.

For their analysis, Clark et al. “filmed 582 individuals from six species across three years and quantified swimming activity in behavioral arenas using automated tracking software.”

The end result of this second focus was the observation that “fish exposed to high CO2 did not exhibit consistently elevated activity levels compared with conspecifics under control conditions.”

In contrast, they found that “activity levels were highly variable among individuals, increasing the risk of type-1 errors in experiments using small sample sizes, and possibly in large-sample experiments that rely on human observation rather than automated video analysis.”

Finally, with respect to behavioral lateralization, the researchers investigated this trait using 175 fishes across four species. Results indicated that there was no CO2 effect on population-level behavioral lateralization.

In commenting on their findings, Clark et al. state the obvious, that “in contrast to previous studies on the same and closely related species, we found no consistent detrimental effects of end-of-century CO2 levels on the avoidance of predator chemical cues, activity levels or behavioral lateralization.”

Consequently, they conclude that “on the basis of our findings on more than 900 wild and captive-reared individuals of six species across three years, we conclude that acclimation to end-of-century levels of CO2 does not meaningfully alter important behaviors of coral reef fishes.”

Therefore, they say “the catastrophic projections for fish sustainability based on CO2-induced behavioral impairments must be reassessed in light of our findings.”

Read more at CO2 Science

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024

Comments 3

  1. Drew Marnier says:
    6 years ago

    I think we fall into the trap that climate alarmists have set for us when we acknowledge the term “ocean acidification “. Any reading on the ph scale above 7 is alkaline. The correct term should be something like “lower alkalinity.”

    Reply
  2. Amber says:
    6 years ago

    Once again proof…. the fewer the facts the stronger the opinion .
    These scientists worked as scientists , using the methods one would expect .
    Their work is open to review and dependable
    So much effort goes into disproving false unscientific fraud but it is worth it .
    A few years ago these brave scientists would have been rightfully concerned about releasing finds that didn’t fit the science fiction on demand promoted by the IPCC .

    Reply
  3. Steve Bunten says:
    6 years ago

    CO2 absorption into the oceans is not leading to turning the oceans acidic but the carbolic acid that CO2 absorbed in water can create may at best reduce the pH to be less Basic (or alkaline). And the pH in the oceans does vary frequently but always well above7pH level (neutral).

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Subscribe To CCD Via Email!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get instant notifications. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • canada forest protectedHow Canada’s ‘Green’ Forest Policies Are Making Wildfires Worse
    Jul 31, 2026
    Canada's 'green' forest policies are fueling bigger wildfires, more smoke, and higher costs, and Americans are paying the price. […]
  • Summer is still summer. Childhood is still childhood.NPR Turns Ordinary Summer Weather Into Climate Anxiety For Children
    Jul 31, 2026
    NPR turns ordinary summer weather into climate anxiety, using emotional anecdotes instead of evidence to convince children they're losing summer. […]
  • Marketing says Net Zero. Reality says natural gas powers AI.Big Tech’s Net Zero Fantasy Collides With AI Reality
    Jul 31, 2026
    Big Tech promised net zero by 2030, but AI data centers are driving emissions higher, exposing the gap between climate rhetoric and reality. […]
  • Britain sacrificed a great deal without changing the outcome.Britain’s Net Zero Crusade Changed Everything—Except the Climate
    Jul 31, 2026
    Britain's net zero crusade imposed huge economic costs while doing little for the climate. It's time to scrap net zero and adapt. […]
  • Human-caused "wildfires" happen far more often than those sparked by lightning or heat, officials say.Nine In Ten ‘Wildfires’ Started By Human Activity, French Government Admits
    Jul 30, 2026
    French officials reveal nine in ten wildfires are started by human activity, not climate change, as arsonists and careless individuals face prosecution. […]
  • clouds sun hotSolar Activity Is The Main Driver Of Earth’s Climate, Scientists Say
    Jul 30, 2026
    New research argues solar activity, not modern warming trends, is the dominant driver of Earth's climate. […]
  • AG dana nesselMichigan Legislature Rebukes State AG On Climate Lawsuit In Latest Budget
    Jul 30, 2026
    Michigan's new budget bars AG Dana Nessel from suing energy firms without legislative approval, a bipartisan rebuke of her climate lawsuit. […]
  • large solar farmMinnesota Wants ‘Clean’ Solar Energy — Built By Chinese Slave Labor
    Jul 29, 2026
    Minnesota's transition away from coal leans heavily on solar panels tied to forced labor in China's Xinjiang region. […]
  • uk direct air vacuumDirect Air Capture: Labour’s Maddest Net Zero Bet, Funded By Taxpayers
    Jul 29, 2026
    Days before leaving office, Ed Miliband committed the UK to becoming a global leader in direct air capture—at eye-watering cost. […]
  • Biden Bucks: How Green Energy Grants Fueled A Bonanza For State Outfits
    Jul 29, 2026
    Green groups, NGOs, and state agencies received huge federal handouts during Biden’s last two years to prop up flailing green energy boondoggles. […]

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Sunset on Net Zero

Canary in a Climate World

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky