• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

FERC Whitewashes Review Of Texas Blackouts In Politically Biased Report

by Jason Isaac
October 06, 2021, 12:57 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
3

texas blackoutThe Biden administration accidentally showed its hand with its new report from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) claiming to uncover the culprit of the Texas blackouts.

Unfortunately, FERC’s report is far from exhaustive and severely swayed by political bias, making it clear Biden’s priority is pushing his political agenda, not getting down to the facts.

FERC’s report cherry-picks data favorable to Biden’s big-government agenda, blaming Texas’ limited-regulation philosophy without evidence and blindly pointing the finger at fossil fuels without context — even though reliable fossil fuels saved countless lives during the winter storm.

FERC’s report completely overlooks the real causes of the systemic weakness plaguing the Texas grid.

Over the last decade, the Lone Star State’s population and economy have boomed. You’d think the energy state would have responded in kind by building more thermal (natural gas, coal, and nuclear) power plants to accommodate that growth — but, unfortunately for Texans, you’d be dead wrong.

Over that same time period, Texas closed 4,000 megawatts of reliable natural gas and clean coal power plants. Wind and solar capacity on the grid nearly tripled, but as Texans learned firsthand, capacity does not equal actual electricity.

Because renewables produce, on average, between just 16% and 46% of their aggregate installed capacity during peak demand hours — whereas fossil fuels consistently operate at well over 90% capacity — we can’t rely on these weather-dependent generators to show up when we need them.

At the height of the winter storm, it was the dead of night, and wind turbines were producing as little as 1.5% of their total capacity.

The media was quick to trumpet that renewables exceeded expectations and couldn’t be blamed — but it’s hard to ask families shivering in the cold and dark to celebrate, especially when the bar was set so low that 1.5% was considered a raving success.

This isn’t a new problem for Texas. Two years ago, the grid came dangerously close to blackouts when the electricity demand during a searing summer day coincided with low wind production.

The only reason we’ve avoided summer blackouts since then is some combination of reduced demand due to the COVID-19 shutdowns and sheer dumb luck. It’s only a matter of time before the weather refuses to cooperate on a high-demand day, the wind doesn’t blow when we need it, and blackouts occur again.

Of course, it’s true that wind and solar weren’t the only power sources with problems during the storm. Several natural gas plants went offline due to weather-related issues, leading many legislators to call for more weatherization funding.

But weatherization would be a Band-aid at best.

Texas’ grid data shows that the state never had enough reliable capacity to get through the storm without blackouts.

Even if every single power plant had been operating at total capacity and every wind turbine had been spinning away as it would on a typical day, there would still have been significant supply shortages causing blackouts.

That’s because natural gas wasn’t the problem. In fact, natural gas saved countless lives during the blackouts. At the peak of the storm, while the wind had almost entirely dropped off the grid, coal generation increased 47%, and natural gas generation increased 450%.

The 25 million Texans whose power stayed on, and those who enjoyed at least intermittent power during the blackouts, have fossil fuels to thank for their warmth and safety.

The Biden administration claims Texas’ limited-government philosophy is entirely to blame for this catastrophe. Actually, big government is the problem.

Hundreds of billions of our tax dollars have been spent subsidizing renewable energy, interfering with the free market, and creating an artificial financial advantage that all but guarantees them a profit.

Oil, gas, and coal are subsidized, too, but at a far lower rate per unit of electricity generated. Wind and solar receive 17 and 75 times more taxpayer funds per megawatt, respectively.

As I explained in a recent PragerU video unpacking the causes of the Texas blackouts, the consequences of these market-distorting subsidies have been deadly.

Imagine owning a successful local restaurant when suddenly your competitor down the street starts getting subsidies — so much he can actually pay his customers to eat his food.

It’s no wonder your business will suffer, even if your food tastes better, while he profits unfairly off the taxpayers’ backs.

Similarly, it’s no wonder fossil fuel plants are closing in Texas — even when they are clearly better suited to provide the affordable, reliable energy we need — when it’s almost impossible for them to succeed.

Biden’s desire for the federal government to regulate every aspect of our lives and his green agenda to put solar panels on every roof won’t prevent more blackouts.

Read more at Washington Times

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026

Comments 3

  1. Grommet says:
    5 years ago

    Excellent Richard
    But why not have an effigy of Don Quixote
    attached to each windmill as a reminder ?

  2. Richard Greene says:
    5 years ago

    This article is biased.
    The FERC report in August 2011 explained a large rolling blackout problem in February 2011. The date of that report could have been changed to 2021 and a chapter could have been added on windmills, to create a new 2021 FERC report.

    Recommendations from the 2011 report were ignored. At the time, Texas wind power capacity was tiny and barely mentioned — it was unusually cold weather that caused the 2011 rolling blackouts, that affected 3.2 million Texans.

    The author of this article seems confused. Lack of “weatherization” of the ENTIRE Texas energy infrastructure, beyond just power plants, was the primary problem in 2021 Same as in 2011 … but worse in 2021 because the weather was colder and the unusually cold weather lasted longer than in 2011.

    Concerning the windmills.
    They worked just as they were designed to work (highly variable, unpredictable output that needs at least 100% fossil fueled backup).

    Since Texas does not believe in winterization, their windmills were purchased without optional blade deicers. So they can only produce energy when the wind is roughly 7mph, or more, and the blades are not iced.

    That sound like a very unreliable source of energy for an electric grid, where reliability is the primary objective. ERCOT was expecting very low wind power in February 2021, and with windmills, there are always a few hours a month with almost no wind power.

    The actual wind power due to frozen blades was about two-thirds of the expected low output — and down in the 1% to 2% range in the hours before the blackouts.

    That low amount of wind power should have been easily offset by more fossil fuel power. But cold weather problems affected fossil fuel (and nuclear) power just as it had in 2011, and before that at least once in the 1980s.

    Windmills did not “fail” in Texas — they did what they were engineered to do — which is pitiful performance when compared with fossil fuel power sources.

    The cold weather problem in Texas has existed for at least 40 years,
    Unusually cold weather hurt Texas electricity consumers in February 2011, and February 2021, and will never be fixed, IMHO, because the cost is too high and there could be a zero return on the investment.

    The decision to not winterize in 2011 looked wise for the next 10 years ,,, as the state of Texas guaranteed good financial returns on windmills, so their capacity multiplied by about 8x in the next 10 years. The problem with all windmills is:
    One windmill + no wind = no electricity
    One bazillion windmills + no wind = no electricity
    Windmills belong in museums, nit attached to electric grids !

    • Allan Shelton says:
      5 years ago

      Excellent..
      Thanks Richard..

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • models vs realityAP’s Climate Doomsday Forecast Is Built On Computer Models, Not Real Data
    Jun 2, 2026
    AP's five-year climate forecast relies on 200 runs of 13 models, not real-world data — and natural factors explain most of the projected warming. […]
  • miliband commonsBritons Told To ‘Cycle More, Eat Less Meat’ To Hit Net Zero Targets
    Jun 2, 2026
    The Climate Change Committee predicts that Britons will have to cycle more and eat less meat to 'balance' the UK's seventh ‘Carbon Budget’. […]
  • zeldin oval officeEPA Chief Makes Criminal Referrals Over Democrat ‘Self-Dealing’ In Green Energy Grants
    Jun 2, 2026
    EPA chief Lee Zeldin made criminal referrals alleging billions in Biden green-energy grants were routed to Democrat cronies via nonprofit pass-throughs. […]
  • climate doomsday machineThe UN’s Climate Doomsday Machine Faces Its Fiercest Storm
    Jun 1, 2026
    IPCC scientists admit their worst-case climate scenarios are no longer plausible — and the UN's doomsday narrative is finally running out of road. […]
  • cartoon scientist rcp85 dumpsterClimate Science Without Its Most Discredited Worst-Case Scenario
    Jun 1, 2026
    The IPCC has retired RCP 8.5, its most discredited worst-case emissions scenario — here's what that means for climate science going forward. […]
  • stock exchange floorBiden’s SEC Climate Rule Is On The Chopping Block — Here’s Why
    Jun 1, 2026
    The SEC has proposed rescinding a Biden-era rule forcing public companies to disclose climate risks, saying the mandate exceeded the agency's authority. […]
  • nytimes hq underwaterOof! NY Times Dances Around UN Scientists Scrapping Trendy Climate Armageddon Scenario
    May 29, 2026
    The NY Times soft-pedals the death of RCP8.5 — the doomsday climate scenario its own reporters hyped for years as inevitable. […]
  • earth bbc signBBC Puts Its Own Spin On Earth’s Climate-Driven ‘Rotation Crisis’
    May 29, 2026
    BBC hypes a 1.33 millisecond-per-century change in Earth's rotation as 'unprecedented,' but natural variation dwarfs it and the effect is biologically nil. […]
  • frozen thames maunder minimumDeclining Solar Activity Confirms New Little Ice Age Has Begun, Researchers Say
    May 29, 2026
    New research links declining solar activity to a Grand Solar Minimum, confirming a new Little Ice Age with 1°C cooling expected by mid-century. […]
  • Newsom presser on gas price lawCalif. Unions Use Environmental Law To Fight Newsom’s Return-To-Office Order
    May 29, 2026
    California unions are weaponizing CEQA, the state's environmental review law, to block Newsom's return-to-office mandate for state workers. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky