• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

“Don’t call me an alarmist,” says alarmist

by Paul Matthews
June 23, 2017, 3:35 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
21
Sarah E. Myhre is not an alarmist. Really, she isn’t.

“Just don’t call me an alarmist,” says Sarah E. Myhre, a junior climate scientist from the University of Washington in Seattle, at the end of her article for Live Science.

Yet earlier in the same article she writes of “the immense challenge of communicating the terrifying and heartbreaking (and I mean those words specifically) risks that come with climate change”.

Here are some of her recent tweets:

Yeah. We are going to watch such devastation unfold through our careers. It is terrifying.

— Dr. Sarah Myhre 🇺🇸 (@SarahEMyhre) June 22, 2017

Terrifying. https://t.co/RjDiizyezd

— Dr. Sarah Myhre 🇺🇸 (@SarahEMyhre) June 19, 2017

Apart from climate alarm, her tweets feature remarks about white people and men.

The article contains some of the usual misleading comparisons used by climate alarmists – greenhouse gases “trap” heat like a “blanket” (no they don’t, a blanket traps warm air, but in the atmosphere hot air rises), and climate change is falsely compared to the smoking-cancer link.

She recently appeared in an odd video, intended as a response to the recent Dilbert cartoon on climate science, discussed by Ross McKitrick, who notes her alarmism and intent to shout from rooftops.

This is one of the problems of climate science. It has politicised itself into an echo-chamber of groupthink, to the extent that enthusiastic young activists who already have the alarmist mindset are attracted into the field, enhancing the bias further. The chances of these people doing decent, objective, professional science are very slim. Near the end, the article laments “a crisis of trust between the American public and climate scientists,” but sadly the author does not have the self-awareness to understand the causes of this mistrust.

Read more at Climate Scepticism

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026

Comments 21

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    9 years ago

    The green nuts are falling from the eco-green nut tree thicker then raindrops during a summer thunderstorm downpour

    Reply
  2. Gator says:
    9 years ago

    Better yet, don’t call her a scientist.

    Reply
    • Sonnyhill says:
      9 years ago

      Their scientific method is socialist in practice. They prop each other up. Praise each other’s contributions. They’re faithful to their union. No public disention .No snitching. Stick together and the money will flow. This particular specimen has a bright future at the trough.

      Reply
      • Me says:
        9 years ago

        Same as religion!

        Reply
        • Sonnyhill says:
          9 years ago

          When someone promises you paradise, ponder their motivation and question their ability to deliver.

          Reply
  3. G says:
    9 years ago

    4TIMES has a good point here. If the idea is to be an activist who positively changes the world, there is no shortage of REAL human crisis and suffering to attend to. Why focus upon such a contrived and dubious issue as man-made climate change?

    The people who dedicate themselves to real causes have little time for self adulation, dressing up like Comic-Con characters,and chasing down the photographers at campus demonstrations-turned parties.

    Positively motivated social activists don’t need to take marching orders from their morally derelict, tenured professors. In this insulated and protected campus world of protest, all roads lead to some form of political socialism – an ideology that has ironically for many years impoverished, enslaved, and murdered millions, of innocent people under various guises of “social justice”.

    Sarah and her friends need a few more REAL history courses instead of the “progressive” fairy tales that substitute for politically corrected truth.

    Reply
  4. Sonnyhill says:
    9 years ago

    Dr. Myhre holds a PhD in The Truth. Resistance is futile. Submit.

    Reply
  5. Vortigern says:
    9 years ago

    These protesters are the same as the pothead jerks of the 60’s and 70’s.
    I’m not trying to justify JFK & LBJ’s entrance and expansion of the
    French Indochinese ( Vietnam ) War
    But their ” reasoning ” and methodology are the same

    No opinion but their opinion is acceptable.

    There is no reason to present your case or opinion or logic,

    The question is already proven .

    Any disagreement will be met with anger and violence.

    And yet they claim to represent freedom of
    thought
    assembly and
    riot.

    Reply
  6. 4TimesAYear says:
    9 years ago

    Rather than take a good look around them, they have these “devastating” images stuck in their heads from all the false prophets of climate change; something from out of a sci-fi movie (Al Gore’s, more specifically). They’ve been totally brainwashed. What can happen that hasn’t happened before?

    Reply
    • Me says:
      9 years ago

      Yes, and looking at from a religious point of view, what was the cause of the disasters claimed by the leaders? Sinners that was the cause, Now look at the current blame Climate sinners! Scam is a scam is a scam! Bottom line!

      Reply
  7. Amber says:
    9 years ago

    Universities were the places to debate now they are drifting to being intolerant and while overstating their value . Church’s used to hold the brainwash trophy . Not anymore .
    President Trump is on the right track . Apprentice programs
    are a tried and true method of bring people into the workforce .
    Do you need an $100,000 BA to work at a bank or coffee shop or to learn a trade .
    Universities customer base are getting fed up with their value proposition .

    Reply
    • Me says:
      9 years ago

      Yes but Churches still to this day do that, remember the Poop and what he is stating now? Err sorry Poop or Pope, pretty much the same !

      Reply
  8. G says:
    9 years ago

    It seems like an overwhelming percentage of lecturing climate “experts” are twenty something college students who dutifully recite the apocalypse mantras of their leftist professors.

    Come back when you’ve stopped receiving participation trophies for just showing up. Come back when you’ve shed your “safe spaces”. Come back when you’ve paid 15 or 20 years of taxes and seen for yourself that the sky isn’t falling like Professor Gore has been saying for the last 30 years.

    Reply
    • Me says:
      9 years ago

      Exactly!

      Reply
      • Vortigern says:
        9 years ago

        You get unearned good grades from leftist professors just for showing up
        and
        the louder you’re a screaming banshee
        and
        the more you violently act out your rage
        the greater your chances of an ” A “

        Reply
        • Me says:
          9 years ago

          And that tells Me you are a moron from that statement! I no more believe in this Glow Bull Whining crap than I believe in this Religious Bullshit! They are one in the same!

          Reply
          • Me says:
            9 years ago

            Or do you believe on one and not the other because of Reasons?????

          • Me says:
            9 years ago

            Because the Bottom line is, If today’s scientist can fudge data for power, prestige and money, then what do you think can happen over 2000 years with the same?

          • Vortigern says:
            9 years ago

            Do you have university experience ?

          • Me says:
            9 years ago

            I have iversity experience Not UN iversatiry experience, and to that point that is just to show that the people that tough you are of like mindedness! So what ever you got is probably worthless, and so you will find out! Realize that what you were tough may be wrong and then think about what you learned!

  9. Spurwing Plover says:
    9 years ago

    How about calling her MENTALY UNSTABLE GREEN ECO-NUT WACKO

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • refinery newsom chevronClimate Change Superstition Still Rules California
    Jun 5, 2026
    California's climate dogma is closing refineries and driving gas prices higher, all based on the state's pervasive global warming superstition. […]
  • End Climate Injustice signScientists Warn Judges Are Being Fed A Rigged Evidence Playbook
    Jun 5, 2026
    Activists have injected agenda-driven consensus into rules of scientific evidence; Chief Justice Roberts has the power to change it back. […]
  • news van black bearBlack Bears Are Thriving In Tennessee — So Why Is The Media Crying Wolf?
    Jun 5, 2026
    Tennessee's black bear population is booming — but WPLN blamed climate change anyway. Here's what the data actually shows. […]
  • cartoon rip climate desksNPR Joins The Climate Journalism Graveyard
    Jun 5, 2026
    NPR has axed its climate desk, becoming the third major outlet to shutter its climate team, following the Washington Post and CBS News. […]
  • golden eagleWyoming’s Golden Eagles Face Extinction As Wind Farms Multiply
    Jun 4, 2026
    Wyoming's golden eagle population has dropped 30% in 20 years. Wind farms are the culprit, and the Endangered Species Act may be the only fix. […]
  • UK electric car chargingCarmakers To Miliband: Your Net Zero Targets Don’t Add Up
    Jun 4, 2026
    Carmakers say Miliband's carbon budget assumes 95% of auto sales will be electric by 2030 — a target the industry calls unrealistic given current demand. […]
  • judge influenceHouse Judiciary Escalates Climate Lawfare Probe With First Subpoena
    Jun 4, 2026
    The House Judiciary Committee has issued its first subpoena in the probe into a coordinated litigation campaign targeting American energy companies. […]
  • offshore wind block islandBlue-State AGs Sue Trump Admin Over $1 Billion Deal To Kill Offshore Wind Leases
    Jun 4, 2026
    Seven state AGs, led by NY's Letitia James, are suing the Trump administration over a $1 billion deal that canceled offshore wind leases. […]
  • eu pres President ursula von der LeyenThe EU Used Climate Alarmism To Grab Green Power — Now It’s Stuck With Both
    Jun 3, 2026
    The EU leveraged climate alarmism to centralize power from member states — now it's trapped by the green ideology it can't abandon. […]
  • calif highway trafficCalifornia Unions Exploit Climate Fears To Block Return-To-Office Mandate
    Jun 3, 2026
    California unions are threatening a CEQA lawsuit over commute emissions to block Newsom's return-to-office mandate for state workers. […]

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky