Never underestimate a Soros-funded eco-extremist group’s capacity to rub it in when its plan to reshape the global government regulatory framework to its financier’s vision starts taking shape. [some emphasis, links added]
E3G (also known as Third Generation Environmentalism) boasted in a July 21 blog that its fixation on “climate security” was possibly “entering a new era.”
E3G Associate Director Kaysie Brown and Senior Policy Advisor Travis Brubaker chirped that “[t]he first generation of climate security work, which E3G helped build, focused on demonstrating that climate change creates security and resilience risk. Across much of the political landscape, that argument has largely been won.”
And now E3G is sitting back watching several countries institutionalize the climate policy snake oil it was selling.
George Soros, who’s made climate change one of the cornerstones of his dark “open society” agenda, dumped at least $1,005,040 into E3G’s coffers between 2020 and 2023 alone.
Brown and Brubaker listed off some of their subterfuge “[wins]” as world governments reshape their regulatory infrastructures:
“Twenty years after the UK first brought climate to the UN Security Council, the topic is re-emerging as a strategic priority. During London Climate Action Week, at E3G and King’s College’s inaugural Climate Security Forum, the UK announced its first ever Climate Security Taskforce, co-chaired by the Ministries of Climate and Defense. Across the forum, five governments delivered the same message: climate now underpins economic, political and security stability.”
But, as is typically the case with Soros’s lackeys, no amount of influence in global affairs is enough. “The institutional response is growing but needs sharper focus. Governments are acting,” Brown and Brubaker wrote.
“Today, more than 60 countries reference climate and security in national or defense strategies. Yet as geopolitical fragmentation deepens and trust in institutions weakens, there is a risk that the language spreads faster than meaningful action.”
Then came the scary part from the E3G fanatics: “A broader concept that reflects a changing global order is needed.” This “broader concept” apparently involves a whole-of-society approach characterized by embedding climate change drivel in practically every level of government decision-making:
“A credible agenda must bring together defense, diplomacy, development, finance and resilience, or we risk securitizing climate without improving security. That means embedding climate across foreign and security policy, including within the offices of policy planners, rather than confining it to environment ministries.”
Soros himself might as well have been speaking through E3G as a conduit. Brown and Brubaker’s dystopian sentiments are practically synonymous with the creepy globalist things he’s blurted out in the past.
He infamously exploited the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic as providing a “revolutionary moment” for fundamental global transformation “when the range of possibilities is much greater than in normal times.”
He continued: “What is inconceivable in normal times becomes not only possible but actually happens. People are disoriented and scared.”
Part of this agenda includes using the spectre of climate change to foster a new world order that bleeds green.
In 2025, MRC Business and Bongino Report co-released a groundbreaking analysis showing that the Soros machine funneled at least $618 million to buy an eco-utopia.
In addition, the report tallied 345 groups around the world that the Soros empire has bankrolled between 2016 and 2023 that have acted as conduits for his vision, with some groups even holding sway in the most powerful international governing bodies (e.g., the United Nations).
E3G, in effect, is chillingly just one facet of a broader, darker Soros scheme.
Top: George Soros, image via Elephants in Room/YouTube screencap.
Read more at NewsBusters
While over 135 countries have declared net-zero emissions targets, you are absolutely right that a vast majority are just a political “pledge” or “declaration” with very little concrete action
Many nations were taking net zero seriously but that number is declining rapidly and the US has definitely dropped out.
The United States has formally abandoned its federal net-zero commitments, while several other large nations—including China, India, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and several European Union member states—are actively delaying, watering down, or failing to submit updated timelines to meet their target
Landmark tracking research from Drexel University found that the core “climate change counter-movement”—consisting of roughly 91 to 140 conservative think tanks, advocacy groups, and trade associations in the U.S.—commanded up to $1 billion per year in total revenue
Looking at U.S.-based nonprofits alone, annual spending sits between $7.8 billion and $9.2 billion