• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Chinese Citizens Are Protesting The World’s Worst Polluter: China

by Helen Raleigh
5 years ago
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
2

…Wuhan, the capital city of Hubei province, is the seventh-largest city in China, with 10 million residents.

Sitting on the bank of Yangtze River, it has long served as an important harbor, a commercial and industrial center in central China. Wuhan is known for its hot weather, hot food, and hot-tempered (but talented) people …

Starting on June 28, thousands of people in Yangluo, a suburb of Wuhan—and only 18 miles from downtown and a designated economic and technology development zone—have been protesting a proposed waste incineration plant in their neighborhood.

They have every reason to be angry. Their city used to be a beautiful place with hundreds of picturesque lakes. Relaxed seniors could often be seen practicing Taiji near waving willow trees at the lakeside.

Now, most lakes are gone, replaced by factories, high-rise apartment buildings, and landfills for garbage. People have lived with smog and terrible smells for years.

Seniors can’t do their morning exercises, and parents won’t let their children play outside. People complain that they can smell the terrible smell from the landfill several miles away.

Residents keep their windows shut all year round, in a futile effort to keep the disgusting smell out.

The Waste Incineration Controversy

After years of complaints, the local government finally promised the people of Yangluo that it would build a park.

But in June, people learned the government was going to build a waste incineration plant, which would turn 2,000 tons of trash each day into energy by burning it on the very site of the promised park.

The city insists such a plant is necessary to promote renewable energy and help tackle the city’s worsening trash disposal situation due to fast urbanization and shrinking available land for building additional landfills.

The residents told foreign journalists they wanted to support the government’s green initiative, but the proposed plant would be less than half a mile away from a dense residential area, which violates even the government’s own minimum recommended distance of at least one mile from any residential area.

Having a waste plant so close to their homes isn’t residents’ only concern. They are also concerned about emissions. Waste plants such as this are known to produce substantial amounts of carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and sulfur dioxide.

According to reports, such emissions “are not only dangerous in China but can also float on air currents across the Pacific, reaching as far as the United States.”

The technology that helps reduce such toxic emission is available, but it is expensive. Chinese companies are known to cut corners to save money. Residents don’t have to search too hard to validate their concerns.

China’s Government Won’t Follow Their Own Rules

The city already has five similar waste incineration plants. One is only about 300 feet from a residential area.

All of these five incineration plants are reportedly beleaguered with problems, including “illegal construction of waste incineration plants close to residential areas, manipulation of the assessment process, limited public participation, and failure of the Wuhan Municipal government to properly enforce disposal standards.”

In other words, had the government’s own environmental standards been strictly followed, none of these plants would have been built.

In an open letter, residents of Yangluo raised many other concerns, including the trustworthiness of the plant’s construction company. Paperwork shows the company, a state-owned enterprise, was formed on April 17, 2019.

People are asking why the government chose to award such a high-impact project to a brand new company that has no track record in building waste incarnation plants.

Rather than addressing the people’s concern, some government officials tried to quiet them by stating that once the waste plant is built, the air pollution and the bad smells will go away.

They also insisted the building plan was still under consideration even though residents have heard construction noise. People are fed up with the government’s lack of transparency, lack of accountability, and lies.

On June 28, concerned Yangluo residents took to the streets to protest the government’s plan.

They carried banners such as “Return us the green mountain and clear waters”; “We want fresh air, not toxic air”; and a direct plea to Chinese President Xi Jinping: “Xi Da Da (Father Xi), Please save Yangluo. Air pollution will ruin our children.”

Government officials were caught off-guard by this demonstration because public protest carries significant personal risks in China.

Chinese people are well trained from a young age that going up against the government is like “hitting a rock with an egg”: it never ends well and will only cause self-harm. Therefore, they rarely take to the streets unless they have no other viable options.

That’s exactly what happened in Yangluo. The local government, on one hand, told residents to stay home and that everything they heard about the waste plant was a rumor. On the other hand, it sent thousands of police in riot gear to confront peaceful protestors.

Videos such as this one and this one recorded police brutality, including beating peaceful protestors. You can hear in the background someone shout in Chinese, “Police are beating people!”

A few dozen protestors were arrested. Still, protestors are undeterred. They have been protesting for seven days by the end of last week, and some carried a new banner that says, “Don’t beat us. We only want to breathe fresh air.”

Of course, Chinese censors quickly scrubbed the internet of any images and references to the Yangluo and Wuhan protests.

The local government also reportedly disabled internet service to prevent residents from using social media to coordinate their protests.

…

China has achieved its impressive economic growth in the last three decades at the expense of its environment and public health.

It’s the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases. Smog is common in many Chinese cities, including Beijing, the capital city.

In December 2015, Beijing had to issue red alerts due to severe air pollution. According to the Council on Foreign Relation’s report on China’s environmental crisis:

In 2014, groundwater supplies in more than 60 percent of major cities were categorized as ‘bad to very bad,’ and more than a quarter of China’s key rivers are ‘unfit for human contact‘… And about 1.05 million square miles of China’s landmass are undergoing desertification, affecting more than 400 million people.

While most Chinese people have demonstrated great tolerance for the government’s internet censorship and massive surveillance, no one is willing to drink contaminated water or breathe toxic air for very long.

Environmental issues have become the top cause of public protests in China. Environment issues are also the top reason why Chinese with means are immigrating to other countries in droves.

When they move, they take their talents and capital with them. Even the Chinese government realizes that environmental issues are threatening the Communist Party’s legitimacy.

In 2015, a documentary about air pollution in China, titled “Under the Dome,” received 100 million views by Chinese netizens within 48 hours. In the film, a 6-year-old girl told the interviewer she doesn’t know what a white cloud looks like.

The film director raised the question of China’s development model and was forced to cut that part out for fear of it not passing the censor. Government censors then quickly shut the film down after its popularity proved it touched a nerve of the country.

In their open letter, people in Yangluo concluded with this:

“As ordinary citizens, we don’t demand much. We just hope to live in an environment that is healthy and safe. We don’t want to harm the interests of anyone else…As Chinese citizens and residents of Yangluo, we believe our government knows what’s the right thing to do.”

I don’t know if they were being sarcastic or hoping that showing good faith in government would help their cause. No matter their intent, if the Chinese government fails to listen to its people, it will have a big problem on its hands.

Read rest at The Federalist

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Truth
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Del
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki iconOdnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • Yummly
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related

Next Post

Study: Pollution Dramatically Lowering Solar Power Output In China

Comments 2

  1. Sonnyhill says:
    5 years ago

    China signed the Paris Accord.
    NIMBY’s love China.
    Don’t worry, be happy!

  2. John says:
    5 years ago

    Climate change due to human interferance will always continue to worsen while the population continues to grow at alarming rates. Houses, roads, airports, warehousing etc etc will be needed and “green land” will be lost. There is no hope for the world unless the poulation of the world is dramatically reduced. The World can no longer sustain the numbers of humans.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Media Ignorantly Blame Climate Change For Heat-Related Deaths During Hajj Pilgrimage
    Jun 28, 2024
    The deaths of more than 1,300 people at this year’s Hajj attributed to heat is tragic, but historically not uncommon. […]
  • UN secretary general antonio guterresThe UN Emperor Has No Science (Just Mangled Metaphors To Pitch Extreme Climate Alarmism)
    Jun 28, 2024
    History will record that the United Nations and its emperor as the greatest organizational perpetrators of junk science in modern times. […]
  • Fayette power plantSupreme Court Strikes Down EPA Rule Targeting Downwind Power Plant Pollution
    Jun 27, 2024
    The Supreme Court blocked an Environmental Protection Agency rule cracking down on power plant pollution. […]
  • protest climate justice riotClimate Lawfare: Using The Courts To Dictate And Enforce Green Energy Policies
    Jun 27, 2024
    Lawfare is becoming a key tactic of the climate cult because they can’t get their wish list enacted through the democratic process. […]
  • cattle cows livestockDenmark Rolls Out ‘Flatulence Tax’ For Livestock To Ostensibly Slash Methane Emissions
    Jun 27, 2024
    Starting in 2030, Danish livestock farmers will have to pay for the greenhouse gases their cows, sheep and pigs produce. […]
  • beach summer heatAn Expert’s Forecast Of Central Europe’s ‘Summer Of Hell’ Already Off-Track
    Jun 27, 2024
    A suspect biologist had predicted a 'summer of hell with almost complete certainty.' It hasn’t materialized yet. […]
  • harris eco adGreenwashing Kamala Harris: How The Veep Casts Herself As An Eco-Justice Crusader
    Jun 27, 2024
    Kamala Harris has long cast herself as a fearless pioneer of social and environmental justice. Her record shows something far different. […]
  • biden solar farmSolar Execs Who Gave Millions To Dems And Lobbied For Subsidies Are Swimming In Cash
    Jun 26, 2024
    Execs and investors in a solar company who donated heavily to Dems and lobbied for Biden’s big climate tax bill ended up as major winners when it passed. […]
  • power plant refineryWhat the Media Won’t Tell You About Fossil Fuels And The Green Energy Transition
    Jun 26, 2024
    Trillions of taxpayer dollars have been spent on a supposed 'green transition' that isn’t occurring at all. In fact, the opposite is happening. […]
  • jennifer granholmBiden DOE Farming Out Home Appliance Rules To Left-Wing Climate Activist Groups
    Jun 26, 2024
    Climate activist groups and far-left green groups helped craft the DOE's aggressive regulations targeting popular household appliances. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Portions © 2024 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Climate Change Dispatch