A major environmental group has continued to pursue litigation blocking the same wildfire forest management techniques that are currently helping to save a mass of iconic sequoias in California.
The Earth Island Institute, a California-based organization, filed a federal lawsuit in June asking the court to halt a “biomass removal and thinning” project proposed by Yosemite National Park and the National Park Service (NPS). [bold, links added]
The lawsuit argued the plan would benefit commercial loggers, negatively impact endangered wildlife, and was unnecessary, asserting dead-tree density was irrelevant to potential wildfire proliferation.
Under the proposal, the NPS had planned to cut down “hazard trees” and remove biomass like fallen dead trees that could contribute to wildfires, according to project documents. On July 5, though, Yosemite National Park agreed to halt its plans pending a court decision in the case.
Previous fuel-reduction treatments, meanwhile, have helped protect historic sequoia trees in Yosemite’s Mariposa Grove amid a raging Washburn wildfire that has ripped through the park since July 7, two days after the NPS plan was halted.
Firefighters have been able to contain 25% of the wildfire which has spread across 2,340 acres of the park.
“We’ve been preparing for the Washburn Fire for decades,” John Dickman, a Yosemite forest ecologist, said Tuesday. “It really just died as soon as it hit the grove.”
White House assistant press secretary Abdullah Hasan acknowledged Wednesday that efforts to protect the forest from wildfire damage “include removing hazardous fuels,” or thicket and dead trees that are contributing to the fire.
In addition, a federal report on the ongoing wildfire fire stated that it is spreading through an area with a “very heavy accumulation” of fuels.
However, Earth Island Institute and other organizations have continued to push against similar NPS forest fire management techniques.
Earth Island’s John Muir Project and a series of other green groups recently announced their opposition to the bipartisan Save Our Sequoias (SOS) Act introduced last month which would boost such efforts, according to its co-sponsors.
“It’s very telling that the loudest voices opposing the SOS Act are the same ones actively thwarting scientific forest management,” one of the bill’s co-sponsors House Natural Resources Committee Ranking Member Bruce Westerman, R-Ark., told Fox News Digital.
“Just last week, the John Muir Project successfully blocked a forest restoration project in Giant Sequoia groves in Yosemite, hours before the Washburn Fire started in the park.”
“All experts on the ground right now are saying the only thing preventing the Mariposa Grove from becoming a raging inferno is the active [forestry] management National Park Service rangers carried out in the park,” he continued. “This confirms what we’ve known all along: if we’re fighting a fire as it spreads, we’ve already lost.”
The SOS Act — which was introduced by Westerman, House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., Rep. Scott Peters, D-Calif., and several other lawmakers on June 23 — would “prioritize wildfire risk reduction treatments in the highest-risk groves” and promote scientific forest management activities, according to its sponsors.
But Chad Hanson, a research ecologist at the John Muir Project, said the NPS plan would have taken place “miles away” from where the Washburn fire is located.
He also said the John Muir Project supports small “prescribed burning” plans and downplayed the current wildfire’s impact, saying “sequoias need mixed-intensity wildfire” to reproduce.
Read rest at Fox News
Greenies blacken and ashen Australia. Why should California be any different?
We must stop pretending that these people have any great environmental understanding. They’re long on emotion and short on substance.
As long as these environmental NGO’s get a “hall pass” in the environmental debate, poor policymaking & adverse consequences will continue. These groups, predominantly, have long switched from conservation to pure activism. They offer NO constructive SOLUTIONS to ANY environmental issue, just obstruction. Mankind is a “cancer” and any activities that support modern society must be stopped. An anti-human agenda at it’s core that has NO CAPACITY for nuance & ability to see the complex trade-offs involved with environmental regulation. Just the “Disciples of NO!” Well, that is just not good enough any more. Time to start challenging their climate clams, funding sources and misguided propaganda. They need to be “reeled in”…and SOON.
There may be a couple of real environmental NGOs, but Earth Island and nearly all the rest should be referred to as pseudo-environmental organizations, due to their pretend understanding of and concern for the natural environment.
I would like to start putting these Eco-Freak idiots on the next big fire and let them learn a little responsibility if their so concerned about Forest Health