1956 Iceberg Was The Size Of Massachusetts and Connecticut Combined

Climate fraudsters are busy today touting an Antarctic iceberg the size of Delaware. In 1956, an iceberg five times as large broke off, and it was the second one that year.

24 Dec 1956, Page 29 – Lebanon Daily News

Massachusetts + Connecticut is much larger than Delaware.

With climate alarmists, it is all misinformation, all the time.

Trackback from your site.

Comments (6)

  • Avatar

    Sonnyhill

    |

    That was 60 years ago. The good old days . Now, because of Mann-made global warming, ice bergs are smaller.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    G

    |

    I keep rereading that story. Where does it blame the Koch Brothers and free market economics for this apocalyptic disaster?

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Spurwing Plover

    |

    If the RMS TITANIC had been sunk in these days the headlines from the liberal rags would be GLOBAL WARMING SUNK THE TITANIC

    Reply

    • Avatar

      rakooi

      |

      LOOK MOMMY ! ALWAYS-SPURNING PLOVER is talking crap again.
      …is that “again” or “still” ?
      *
      SADLY,
      “The notion that climate scientists either invented or exaggerated global warming is one that’s been rumbling around for quite some time.
      …It’s often used as an argument to OPPOSE / DENY the
      SOLID SCIENCE of global warming, but it’s not something that has ever been substantiated
      – despite my numerous requests for links to ANY corroborating evidence.

      “It’s actually quite a bizarre claim given that global warming will be celebrating it’s 200th birthday in a few days.

      (Though Postulated in 1799)
      The first scientific connection to global warming dates from 1811,when the physicist and astronomer Simeon Denis Poisson speculated that atmospheric pollution led to increased temperatures.
      https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20111129193035AAnHMH2

      “Jean-Baptiste Joseph Fourier
      -was a French mathematician and physicist…and best known for initiating the investigation of Fourier series & their applications to problems of heat transfer and vibrations.
      http://burgess1837.geologist-1011.mobi/

      “In 1896 the Swedish chemist Svante Arrhenius was the first person to produce documented empirical evidence as to the existence of global warming, this was published in his paper “On the Influence of Carbonic Acid in the Air upon the Temperature of the Ground”
      (carbonic acid being the chemical name of the time for carbon dioxide).
      http://www.rsc.org/images/Arrhenius1896_

      “It’s claimed that scientists falsify the theory of global warming in order to receive funding.
      “The great problem with this argument is that ANY & ALL funding that is provided (not to individuals but to respected & tightly monitored institutions) will be strictly controlled and in most cases will be monitored and audited by the funding body and / or their appointed auditors and/or the institutions.

      “Any deliberate misappropriation of funding would be a criminal offence for which the offender could be jailed.

      This has never happened. <<<

      “The Virginia State Attorney – Ken Cuccinelli – embarked on something of a witch-hunt against the climate scientist Michael Mann and invoked the
      ** Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act ……claiming that Dr. Mann had misappropriated public funds.

      “The Judge threw the case out.
      http://www.ucsusa.org/news/press_release

      “I’m actually a climate scientist myself and I can assure you that it’s nothing to do with the money
      (I work in the private sector so there’s almost no public funding available).
      (After 5 years, the average Researcher with nearly 2 advanced degrees earns Less than a 1st Year Elementary School Teacher, even though that researcher has at least 1 more degree)
      Anyone embarking on a climate science study course is well aware that they’re never going to become rich.

      If they were more concerned about money they would use their scientific background and work in petrochemicals or pharmaceuticals.

      It’s also assumed that climate scientists do nothing other than study climate change.

      In reality, this makes up a small proportion of the workload and many scientists will go through their whole career without ever researching climate change.

      The argument falls flat on it’s face yet again when you consider that companies with the most to lose from climate change being a reality
      – the oil and power companies – have their own in-house climate scientists and they are reporting exactly the same as those working in the public sector.

      Furthermore, climate change is a multi-disciplinary subject and involves scientists from a wide spectrum including botanists, marine biologists, oceanographers,
      cosmologists, physicists, atmospheric chemists etc.

      *It stretches credibility beyond all forms of reason to believe that such a huge number of people could be involved in a scam and not one person has ever spoken out.

      It’s also worth bearing in mind that the first warnings made to the US government about impending climate change came from research conducted by
      the US Army at the Camp Century base in Greenland.
      Are we also to believe that the military are also involved in some sort of global conspiracy?

      PS – The psychological aspect of climate change can be found within the realms
      of the psychology of denial and the diffusion of responsibility.
      These conditions manifest themselves as
      a) a filter mechanism that inhibits
      the acceptance of conflicting ideas and opinions in order to maintain a delusion and
      b) the reluctance to become involved on the basis that someone else will deal with the problem.
      Source(s):
      I’m a climate scientist and my Mum’s a retired professor of psychology
      Trevor ·
      6 years ago ..”

      This Scientist spoke out a decade ago,
      now, the same old tired disproven
      allegations by Skeptics and Deniers…..all, without foundation, without proof RETURN FROM THE DEAD! !

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Sonnyhill

    |

    Greenland was the first known climate con. Erik the Red gave it the name to encourage immigration.
    We expect corporations to defend their interests. They would be liable to shareholders if they didn’t.
    If and when catastrophic AGW graduates from hypothesis to scientific fact (lol) ,then you can demand corroborating evidence from skeptics.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Spurwing Plover

    |

    They banned DDT becuae of Carsons lies and junk science now we have West Nile Virus,Malaria and Yellow Feaver spreading plus the rare birds in hawaii are suffering becuase of Carson’s Junk Science. Someone need to read the book ECO-FREAKS especialy fools like Rakooi

    Reply

Leave a comment