• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

What German Voters Know About Nuclear Power

by WSJ Editorial Board
August 08, 2022, 9:38 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
6

nuclear power plant germanyGermany’s energy policies are among the biggest threats facing Europe’s economy, and if there’s a silver lining it is that German voters are beginning to realize it.

Recent polling suggests a consensus is solidifying in favor of nuclear energy in what has been a nuclear-skeptic country. If only the politicians in Berlin would catch up. [bold, links added]

The main controversy now concerns whether to extend the lives of the country’s three remaining nuclear reactors, which provide about 6% of its electricity but are scheduled to shut down at the end of the year.

Some 78% of respondents support running those power plants at least until summer 2023, according to a survey published on the weekend by Spiegel magazine, and 67% would support running the reactors for another five years.

Polling released last week by Infratest dimap for the ARD television network found similar levels of support.

Some 82% of respondents favor keeping nuclear power, half of those “for a few months” and half for the longer term.

That’s up from 61% who supported extending nuclear power in the firm’s June survey.

Even members of the anti-nuclear Green Party are coming around: 68% of self-identified Green voters supported extending nuclear in the latest survey, up from 38% in June.

One might ask what took Germans so long. Former Chancellor Angela Merkel instigated the nuclear phaseout in 2011 after the Fukushima disaster.

German voters allowed this to proceed with nary a peep of electoral disapproval—never mind that renewables can’t power an industrial economy and reliance on natural gas left Germany vulnerable to Vladimir Putin.

The new German support for nuclear power is all the more remarkable for arising without much political leadership.

Current Chancellor Olaf Scholz is dithering while Economy-and-Climate Minister Robert Habeck of the Green Party hems and haws about whether a nuclear extension would be safe and necessary.

German voters can see the toll of Mr. Putin’s war in Ukraine and the cost of Berlin’s failed 20-year green-energy transition, and they are opening to reality.

The country’s economic prospects—and Europe’s—depend on whether their leaders will follow that example.

h/t Steve B.

Read more at WSJ

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024

Comments 6

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    Screw Greenpeace go Nuclear

    Reply
  2. Sonnyhill says:
    4 years ago

    Germany reminds me of a classic Cheech and Chong skit.
    “What is that, komrad? Hmmm, smells like sh!t. Tastes like sh!t, too.
    Good thing we didn’t step in it!”

    Reply
  3. Randy Verret says:
    4 years ago

    Folks in Germany & the rest of the EU better hope for a mild winter this coming season. Otherwise, the COLD reality of energy imperatives may just make for a huge “misery index” for the continent. That may even be a reality IF the Russians don’t completely curtail natural gas exports. Meanwhile in the U.S…our elected representatives (on one side of the aisle) don’t seem to be getting the message. Unfortunately by next Spring, I have a feeling a lot of folks in Europe will “curb” their their enthusiasm for the “green revolution.” I suggest our government in DC start paying attention. Otherwise, the U.S will unnecessarily find itself in a similar predicament in the very near future…

    Reply
    • Steve Bunten says:
      4 years ago

      Randy, it may seem cruel but I am hoping for a winter of discontent so that the voters reject the “green energy” nonsense and demand exploiting their fossil fuel deposits. And it’s going to be happening here in North America pretty soon.

      Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Subscribe To CCD Via Email!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get instant notifications. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • deep sea geologic activityHow Undersea Geological Activity Could Influence El Niños
    Sep 9, 2026
    Geological activity may be an overlooked factor influencing El Niño, as undersea eruptions, seafloor heat, and the Ring of Fire offer intriguing clues. […]
  • headlines failed predictionsApocalypse Not: Decades Of Failed Doomsday Predictions Refuse To Die
    Sep 9, 2026
    From resource depletion and mass starvation to peak oil and climate catastrophe, decades of failed doomsday predictions have repeatedly fallen short. […]
  • dems climate messagingDemocrats Go Quiet On Climate Messaging After Biden-Era Regulatory Blitz
    Sep 9, 2026
    Democrats’ climate change messaging is fading from midterm campaigns as affordability and the rising cost of living take center stage. […]
  • nepal flood aftermathThe Nepal Flood Was Natural—China’s Deadly Policies Aren’t
    Sep 8, 2026
    The Nepal flood was triggered by a natural rock collapse, but China’s decision to build in its path turned a geological event into a deadly disaster. […]
  • supreme court protestClimate ‘Lawfare’ Advocates Plot Strategy As Supreme Court Showdown Looms
    Sep 8, 2026
    The Supreme Court climate lawsuit has activists eyeing consumer-protection and tort claims as a fallback if the justices derail state litigation. […]
  • neil shubinNAS President Admits Climate Chapter Skipped Normal Review, Used One-Sided Authors
    Sep 8, 2026
    The NAS president conceded the climate science chapter lacked standard oversight, while its authors’ ties to plaintiffs raised bias concerns. […]
  • brandenburg coal plantClimate Extremists Target Germany’s Power Grid In Wave Of Attacks
    Sep 7, 2026
    German power grid attacks have targeted substations and high-voltage lines, as authorities investigate links to far-left climate extremists. […]
  • eagle overlooks wind farmChanges To Endangered Species Act Expose Green Groups’ Double Standards
    Sep 7, 2026
    Green groups blast Endangered Species Act changes while largely ignoring wildlife harms linked to favored wind and solar projects. […]
  • California highway vehiclesJudge Blocks Trump EPA’s Bid To Undo California’s Costly Emissions Rules
    Sep 4, 2026
    California clean air laws remain intact after a federal judge blocked the Trump EPA’s effort to repeal the state’s special emissions waivers. […]
  • Deadly Nepal landslides leave homes buried in mud and debris.CNN Pivots From Climate Change To Trump Over Nepal’s Deadly Landslides
    Sep 4, 2026
    CNN shifts its Nepal landslide coverage to blame Trump, citing USAID cuts that the network admits wouldn’t have prevented the disaster. […]

Books You May Like

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky