The Skeptics Witch-Hunt Is On…Pope Francis Unleashes Inquisition 2.0

It is the duty of every Catholic to persecute heretics.” – Pope Gregory IX, 1170-1241, organizer of the Inquisition

They that approve a private opinion, call it opinion; but they that mislike it, heresy: and yet heresy signifies no more than private opinion.” – Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), Leviathan

Now fast forward almost 800 years since Pope Gregory IX’s proclamation on heretics. Guided by global warming dogmatists such as Hans Joachim Schellnhuber of the ultra-alarmist Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Pope Francis went on to issue a Papal encyclical on the environment and human ecology: Laudato Si, thus making environmentalism a part of Catholic dogma – one that makes challenging climate science heresy.

Now in the wake of Hurricane Irma, Pope Francis has sharply criticized man-made climate change skeptics, implying they are “stupid.” He said on Monday during an in-flight press conference:

Those who deny it [climate change] should go to the scientists and ask them. They speak very clearly. I am reminded of a phrase from the Old Testament, I think from the Psalm: ‘Man is stupid, he is stubborn and he does not see.’”

So says His Holiness, whose Church obstinately took 390 years to apologize for the persecution of heretic Galileo. The bad weather was in fact brewed by skeptics and bad people, the pope insists.

Today a number of (Democrat) politicians and overzealous alarmists in the USA are hysterically calling for the criminalization of climate science skepticism and skeptic opinion. For those having read some religious history, this may sound very familiar and remind them of the ugly Inquisition days of the Catholic Church – time when “heretics” were rounded up, brutally tortured and murdered by Church higher-ups — all over Europe, 600 years long.

Papal Pact with population control advocate Paul Ehrlich

For many of the faithful, something is terribly amiss with this Pope. Recently he even suggested that Donald Trump was not really a pro-lifer, thus seemingly turns a blind eye to the US Democratic Party’s staunch support for Planned Parenthood abortion factories and a US health care law that forces faithful Catholics to fund abortions against their will.

Earlier this year “population control activist Paul Ehrlich spoke at a Vatican conference on how to save the natural world” today despite an outcry by members of the Catholic faithful“, writes here. Pope Francis appears to be opening the door to population control.

This is all getting monstrous, hysterical and irrational, and so it’s time for global warming skeptics and the faithful to take a firm and resolved stand against this rogue Pope.

We must never cave into the Pope’s destructive Inquisition-like dogma and demonization of free thought. We have to remain steadfast, and possibly so for decades or even centuries. Those who want us to forget the past, are those who long for its repeat. Inline with his “stupid and stubborn” statement, Pope Francis seems to harbor a detestation for the human race.

This is one pope I’ve stopped listening to.

Read more at No Tricks Zone

Comments (5)

  • Avatar



    Why is the DOPE
    so concerned about the AGW myth
    when he shows no concern at all for the rampant
    homosexuality in his church and
    rampant pedophilic crime in his church.

    And why is there no discussion of the billions his church is paid to aid illegal ” immigration ” and settlement for military-age moslem aliens who are NOT ” refugees ” ?

    WHY ??

    The DOPE is a lying phony who is profiting from criminal activity and refuses to clean up his own house while
    Arrogating unto himself the authority to tell everyone else how to live.


    • Avatar



      Don’t forget anachronistic goof.

  • Avatar

    Spurwing Plover


    The pope is a fake he id satan’s pope and perhaps he is a sinner becuase he is worshiping a the false religion of Enviromentalism

  • Avatar

    Frank Gue


    Date: 13 Sept 17
    By: Frank Gue, B.Sc., MBA, P.Eng.,
    Professional Engineer,
    2252 Joyce St., Burlington, ON L7R 2B5, 905 634 9538
    For: The editors, The Spec., Hamilton
    Re: “Republicans in denial”? Sept. 13, p. A11

    Dear Editors:

    This article calls climate change skeptics “deniers”, but
    is itself a denier. To accomplish this clever trick of
    contradicting itself, the Washington Post (WAPO)
    cunningly suppresses the huge hidden assumption
    behind their “denier” pejorative, which is that MAN-MADE
    climate change is settled science, which it isn’t.

    An example of the bad science behind “man-made climate
    change” is CO2, an essential component of all
    life including ours. In fact we likely need more of it.
    Reduce pollution, yes, but reduce CO2, no. We em-
    phatically do not have a link between climate change
    and human-generated CO2.

    Pedlars of bad science like Michael Mann are quoted
    supporting this unproven man-made climate change
    hypothesis. Natural phenomena like sea level rise are
    dragged in as proof of it, when actually the sea level is
    simply rising an inch per century, as it has been for
    thousands of years.

    Further, we should note that the climate change industry
    yields nice personal profits for its promoters, such as writers
    of columns like “Republicans in denial?”.

    It is difficult to connect these dots into a picture
    that warrants calling skeptics of man-made climate change
    “deniers”, particularly when WAPO itself denies much.


  • Avatar



    This is further evidence that the religious movement is itself a fake movement. If the Pope was “ACTUALLY” God’s representative on Earth and was actually in direcct communication with God – God would be able to tell him that the Global Warming movement is Bullshit and the Church should not be associated with this movement.

    A bit like the House impprisonment of Galileo and that he was forced to recant his discoveries by the Church – God would have been able to explain to the Pope – and therefore the Church – that Galileo was indeed correct and conventional thinking was wrong…………….

Comments are closed