The Real Arctic Versus The Arctic Of Climate Scientists

Arctic sea ice extent is normal, growing rapidly, and higher than 2006.

Charctic Interactive Sea Ice Graph | Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis

Greenland’s surface is gaining ice very rapidly, but not quite as fast as last year’s record winter gain.

Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Mass Budget: DMI

Scientists in Greenland are buried in deep snow.

summit:status:webcam

NASA says Antarctica is gaining ice.

NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses | NASA

Meanwhile, climate experts claim the exact opposite. It is much easier for them to lie about places where nobody lives.

Read more at Real Climate Science

Trackback from your site.

Comments (7)

  • Avatar

    rakooi

    |

    During WW2 & the Cold War…U.S. subs routinely landed soldiers to measure Ice Depth in the ARCTIC…..10′ to 16′ was a common depth…….today, seldom do the get close to 10 feet thick….
    SO WHEN this reactionary site talks about ICE EXTENT….notice they never talk about Depth (actually QUANTITY) of ice…
    By the Way, we are going into ARCTIC winter with next to no sunlight during the period they report on…there is NO SUN in the ARCTIC 24 HOURS a day today…..ice should be spreading and thickening.

    LAST year, MID WINTER, with no sun 24 hours a day…..temperatures reached above the freezing mark…..when the temp is usually 25 Below to 65 Below ZERO !

    And last year around this time of year…..there was a 300,000 Square Mile Lake (slush & water)…that is the size of TEXAS….
    Complete with a Niagara Style Water Fall…and a RAIN shower…..
    WHO EVER HEARD of a RAIN SHOWER on the desert continent….where the average temperature year around is 52 BELOW ZERO

    Reply

    • Avatar

      JayPee

      |

      I ask everyone to pay attention and come your own determinations.
      Andrzejewski
      who now calls himself
      rakooi
      has been bombarding this website for years with a
      cacophony of oral excrement which
      should you care to analyze it
      is nothing but cheap argument from authority
      which is not argument at all
      nor reasoning
      nor logic
      But cheap bullying as if upon his
      authoritative declaration you have no right to respond
      and be cheaply degraded and ridiculed anyway

      I ask all of you to think for yourselves
      and come to your own conclusions

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Jaypee is an idiot

        |

        Uh nope.
        Wrong again Mr Idiot.
        Hey, are you evergoing to provde evidence for that (3 chuckles and 2 giggles) albedo warming theory of yours?

        Reply

  • Avatar

    DGSchroder

    |

    ” … this reactionary site talks about ICE EXTENT….notice they never talk about Depth (actually QUANTITY) of ice…

    Did you even pay attention to this article before spewing your nonsense. The titles say: “Mass Budget of the Greenland Ice Sheet” and also “Mass gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet greater than losses” Most of this IS about the QUANTITY of ice, and not about the amount of ice extent!

    Reply

  • Avatar

    David Lewis

    |

    It is interesting that you picked the time frame of World War II. Of the warming blamed on mankind, 40% occurred between 1910 and 1941. I would expect the ice to be thinner at that time.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Jaypee is an idiot

    |

    Does anyone here know how to read a graph?
    The date selected to prove ice is recovering is still 2 standard deviaions BELOW NORMAL!
    LOL

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Spurwing Plover

    |

    The modern enviromental movments full of idiots like Rakooi Bore,DiCaprio and all those ones from Greenpeace

    Reply

Leave a comment