Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told President Donald Trump that Democrats won’t cut a deal with him on infrastructure spending unless it includes a slew of policies aimed at fighting global warming.
Schumer, the Senate’s top Democrat, called for, among other things, making green energy and electric vehicle tax credits permanent, more research funding into green technology and funding to harden infrastructure against extreme weather.
“The impacts will continue to worsen if we do not take decisive and immediate action to transition to a 100-percent clean energy economy,” Schumer wrote in a letter to Trump sent Thursday.
Both Trump and Democrats proposed $1 trillion infrastructure packages, but Democrats also want to make an infrastructure build-up about fighting global warming.
“A single infrastructure bill will not solve our climate problem in its entirety, but it is an important first step,” Schumer wrote to Trump, also giving a list of demands for any infrastructure plan.
Schumer’s letter, and accompanying Washington Post op-ed, come as Democrats push for global warming to become a central focus of 2019.
A small, but growing, cadre of Democrats led by Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York want “Green New Deal” legislation to rapidly force the U.S. to use 100 percent green energy.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who’s expected to be elected speaker next year, favors reviving a special committee on global warming, much like the one behind the failed effort to pass cap-and-trade legislation in 2010.
Ocasio-Cortez joined protesters who occupied Pelosi’s office in mid-November to demand a “Green New Deal.” While light on details, Ocasio-Cortez has framed the effort as a way to fight global warming and rectify social and racial “injustices.”
“This is going to be the Great Society, the moonshot, the civil rights movement of our generation,” Ocasio-Cortez said in a panel discussion Tuesday. “This is the mechanism through which we can really deliver justice to communities that have been underserved.”
Other top House Democrats, however, favor pushing climate bills through existing committees, fearing the creation of a special panel on the issue could unnecessarily delay legislation.
“In the 116th Congress, however, Democrats will have an extraordinary opportunity to force action on climate change,” Schumer wrote. “Not only will House Democrats have the power to propose, debate and pass progressive legislation on the subject, but Senate Democrats will have substantial leverage as well. For any legislation to pass the Senate, 60 votes are required.”
Schumer said infrastructure package could be paid for by “reversing the worst giveaways in the Trump tax bill, those gifted to multinational corporations and the wealthiest of the wealthiest.”
However, Trump and Republican lawmakers are unlikely to support any infrastructure package that includes reversing tax cuts signed into law late in 2017, especially if that includes reversing corporate tax cuts the GOP has been fighting for years to lower.
Likewise, many Republican lawmakers and conservative groups oppose making green energy tax credits permanent. And Trump recently criticized GM for cutting thousands of jobs to ramp up electric vehicle production.
….for electric cars. General Motors made a big China bet years ago when they built plants there (and in Mexico) – don’t think that bet is going to pay off. I am here to protect America’s Workers!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 27, 2018
Many automakers, including GM and Tesla, expect to see electric car subsidies drop from $7,500 to $3,750 per vehicle by the middle of next year.
Federal electric vehicle subsidies start to phase out for companies that produce 200,000 or more.
Read more at Daily Caller
As always the Democrats put their own interests over the interests of America and the American People and Chuckie Sleeze is a perfect example of the liberal STUPID JACKASS PARTY
By God, men, against global warming you can not fight, neither against global cooling. Do not be so absurd or so pretentious; or that we were Gods. The only thing we can do is take mitigation measures and adapt as much as possible. On the other hand, the earth will never be heated indefinitely, nor the contrary; If he did, we would no longer exist.
These bastards are going to wreck our country with this Gorean-principled CO2 anthropogenic global-warming/climate change pan-Leninist Marxist BULLSHIT! No such thing as “climate science” exists — it’s a total lie and we have to shut that down now.
Politicians are planning to loot the country to fight an imaginary problem. MSM is a willing co-conspirator with zero curiosity about the biggest scam in world history. UN & IPCC have intentionally corrupted science to push their wealth transfer scheme. It’s not about pollution or climate it’s all about power and control—World Order. Nations aligned with the UN position preach that the success of the modern world is failure. If their false religion becomes dominant failure will be hailed as success. Those pushing the hardest to”fight climate change” believe when they win their hands will be on the controls—Wrong. They’re simply a means to an end and will be “discarded” as real evil takes control!!
The Dem’s are going into full obstruction – mode. Their posturing on federal funding for green infrastructure will go nowhere with Trump and they know it.
Individual states will take the initiative where it is popular.
Polling shows that climate change is off most peoples’ top ten list. Democrats know that.
Ironically, the USA is the only industrial nation that is reducing Co2 emissions. Pursuing the failed tech of wind, solar and green subsidies will only increase emissions. How do we know they are failed tech? They need subsidies.
Engineers call it a misconception, a failure that should have remained on paper.
Schmuck Chomper
Should shut his c..s…ing mouth because he is
NOT
Senate Majority Leader
Altho the MSM wants to give everyone the impression
That he is !
“Other top House Democrats, however, favor pushing climate bills through existing committees, fearing the creation of a special panel on the issue could unnecessarily delay legislation.” …..because a “climate change committee” would expose the LIE to scientific scrutiny and debate.