The widespread use of regularly adjusted global and local surface temperature datasets showing increasingly implausible rates of warming has been dealt a further blow with new groundbreaking research that shows 50% less warming over 50 years across the eastern United States.
The research attempts to remove distortions caused by increasing urban heat and uses human-made structure density data over 50 years supplied by the Landsat satellites. [bold, links added]
The 50% reduction in the warming trend is in comparison with the official National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) homogenized surface temperature dataset.
The research was compiled by two atmospheric scientists at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, Dr. Roy Spencer and Professor John Christy.
They used a dataset of urbanization changes called ‘Built-Up’ to determine the average effect that urbanization has had on surface temperatures.
Urbanization differences were compared to temperature differences from closely spaced weather stations. The temperature plotted was in the morning during the summertime.
A full methodology of the project is shown here in a posting on Dr. Spencer’s blog.
Dr. Spencer believes that the ‘Built-Up’ dataset, which extends back to the 1970s, will be useful in ‘de-urbanizing’ land-based surface temperature measurements in the U.S. as well as other countries.
All the major global datasets use temperature measurements from the Integrated Surface Database (ISD), and all have undertaken retrospective upward adjustments in the recent past.
In the U.K., the Met Office removed a ‘pause’ in global temperatures from 1998 to around 2010 by two significant adjustments to its HadCRUT database over the last 10 years.
The adjustments added about 30% warming to the recent record. Removing the recent adjustments would bring the surface datasets more in line with the accurate measurements made by satellites and meteorological balloons.
Of course, if the objective is to promote a command-and-control Net Zero project using widespread fear of rising temperatures to mandate huge societal and economic changes, a little extra warming would appear useful.
But warming on a global scale started to run out of steam over 20 years ago, and the stunt can only be pulled for so long before the disconnect with reality becomes too obvious.
There is a danger that the integrity of the surface measurements will be put on the line. Earlier this year, two top atmospheric scientists, Emeritus Professors William Happer and Richard Lindzen told a U.S. Government inquiry that “climate science is awash with manipulated data, which provides no reliable scientific evidence.”
As regular readers will recall, this is not the first time that the NOAA U.S. surface database has been under fire. The U.S. meteorologist Anthony Watts recently published a critical report calling it “fatally flawed”.
He found that 96% of U.S. temperature stations failed to meet what NOAA itself considered to be acceptable and uncorrupted placement standards.
Watts defined ‘corruption’ as being caused by the localized effects of urbanization.
His report also drew attention to a rarely-publicized NOAA database compiled from 114 nationwide stations designed to provide continuous recordings away from urban heat distortions.
The measurements started in 2005, and to date show little if any warming.
Below is the graph plotted by Dr. Spencer showing the ‘raw’ measurements taken from the ISD compared with his de-urbanized figures over 37 eastern states.
It can be seen that there is a dramatic fall in the warming trend over the last 50 years, down to only 0.12°C a decade. But the NOAA-adjusted figures are even higher than the raw data.
The official NOAA average is actually 0.24°C warming a decade, meaning the de-urbanized measurement is 50% lower than this.
Airports are a favorite measuring place since they offer regular and accurate readings. Of course, it has been noted that they are prone to enormous urban heat effects.
Three of the top four temperature records during the last summer in the U.K. were set at airports. Here is why Heathrow airport should never again be used by the Met Office as a poster story for global warming.
The raw data for Orlando International Airport in Florida show a massive 0.3°C warming per decade but falls to a de-urbanized figure of just 0.07°C.
It is early days for Spencer’s work in this field, and he reports that the 50% figure is likely to be the upper limit of de-urbanization adjustments. Other times and months may be lower.
But he notes that all CMIP6 climate models produce U.S. summertime temperature trends greater than NOAA observations, which means the “discrepancy between climate models and observations is even larger than currently suspected by many of us.”
Spencer ends by stating that he and John Christy “believe it is time for a new surface temperature dataset, and the method outlined… looks like a viable approach to that end”.
Meanwhile, COP27 starts at the weekend. It is a fair bet that every warning of future temperature rise will reference the politically-correct surface datasets, and every forecast of climate thermageddon will incant the authority of climate models.
Read more at Daily Sceptic
Lately I read a warmist’s case against satellite temperature data. It was irrelevant because, to him, the temperature that matters the most is where the most people live. Ergo, urban heat IS climate change. NOT!
When weather stations’ locations were determined decades ago, there was no consideration for the global warming debate, they just wanted to know what the conditions were then.
Everyone back then knew that it was hotter downtown. Downtown is a lot bigger than it used to be and the warmists are dishonest by ignoring the fact.
By him saying that he is only interested in Urban temperatures (which is what the surface data measures, even before “adjustments”), he is effectively discounting warming by atmospheric CO2.
In other words.. he is a heretic to the AGW cause ! 😉
And why were the alarmist twirps lying?