• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

New Numbers For Bullet Train To Nowhere Reveal Calif. State Near Collapse

by P. Gardner Goldsmith
March 14, 2018, 2:41 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
8
Last year, Calif. Democrats raised gas taxes and vehicle fees by $5.2 billion a year. Nearly 30% is going toward non-infrastructure projects.

Until recently, many California leftists claimed that their Great Leader, Democrat Governor Jerry Brown, had created a surplus for his loving people.

Perhaps they felt it was a way to show conservative Republicans that a government could be known as a leftie stronghold while balancing budgets.

There’s just one problem with this, something that was revealed last year by Hans Bader, of CNS news, and is now being exposed even further.

Turns out, the great “surplus” became a deficit when 2016 spending numbers were “discovered” to have been undercounted by $1.9 billion, and, this week, the Brown government revealed that the magical “bullet train” being built by the government between Los Angeles and San Francisco will run, get this, an estimated $77.9 billion by the time the first few trains might possibly run in 2029.

That’s an increase of $13 billion from estimates provided two years ago.

The price of the California bullet train project jumped sharply Friday when the state rail authority announced that the cost of connecting Los Angeles to San Francisco would be $77.3 billion and could rise as high as $98.1 billion — an uptick of at least $13 billion from estimates two years ago.

Can you imagine a private company doing this? Of course not. But the California government can take people’s money without asking them to voluntarily offer it; they can take the cash through taxation, which Brown and his allies have been doing, seemingly with pride.

Just last year, Jerry signed a bill that increased gas taxes and vehicle fees by $5.2 billion annually, and many residents believed the money would be reserved for highway and bridge repairs.

But as Republican California State Assemblymember Melissa Melendez noted last year, nearly 30% is not being used on roads and bridges.

Some is being spent on university projects, some for job training for felons, and some for parks, to name just a few divergences. Oh, and then there’s the money that will go towards, yeah, you got it, trains.

And the Democrat-led California Assembly also raised the state income tax last year, bringing the top level to 13.3% for the next decade.

Yet this group of politicians wants to shell out between $77.3 and $98.1 billion on a “high speed” rail system between the City of Angels and the Gate City of San Fran.

No wonder businesses and residents have been fleeing the state in droves.

But this is not just a run-of-the-mill example of bad governance or legislative tomfoolery that should be lined up beside so many others in the US and world history.

This story includes in it a historical and economic lesson we can learn, and that lesson is about public rail projects.

Guess what?

Public rail is always, without exception, a loser. From the time of the boondoggle “Transcontinental Railway” that was years over time and millions over budget thanks to government cronyism.

And this tradition has not stopped. As I noted in my book, “Live Free or Die”, when factoring for tax subsidies and loans, no public rail line in history has run in the black.

In fact, almost anyone familiar with how politicians and special interests work can note that rail projects are ways to force taxpayers who don’t live near the lines and will likely not use them to subsidize rail users, rail builders, and employees, and business interests located near the rail stops.

The story hasn’t changed since the days of the Transcontinental Railroad when workers would knowingly plant rails on permafrost, aware that the land would shift in the spring, and they would be able to charge more to the feds for conducting the repairs.

If a rail line is a good economic investment, there is no need to subsidize it. If there is a market for the transportation, customers will be attracted, and private investors will line up to loan start-up cash.

In fact, this is precisely what happened during the time of the Transcontinental Railroad.

What many Americans don’t know is that while the feds were bungling and pocketing huge collections of taxpayer money for themselves, the privately run Great Northern Railway successfully beat the government at its own game, creating a transcontinental rail under time and on budget.

Nothing in politics changes.

But it’s important to look at the contemporary stories and try not to get frustrated. Rather, we can use them as catapults to go back into history and learn, then spread that information to others…

…Even as collectivists tell us how “financially responsible” they are in places like California.

Read more at MRCtv

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024

Comments 8

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    The Chattanooga Choo Choo,The Orage Blossem Special,The Wabash Cannonball,The City of new Orleans,The Soul Train and the A Train all going somewhere the Moonbeam Pork Train going nowhere

  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    Moonbeam wants his high speed Choo Choo so he can move more illegal aliens(Future Democratic Voters)all over the state

    • Al Shelton says:
      8 years ago

      Date of opening 2029.
      Moonbeam will be dead by then. [maybe]
      SF and LA will only have homeless people riding back and forth as all the businesses will be gone.. ;^D

  3. Amber says:
    8 years ago

    For some reasons politicians like Gerry Brown do have a very good sense for when the barn door is going to knock them on their ass
    and conveniently slip out just before the event .
    California is the new fly over country. Businesses are cowards they only go where they are welcome . They are welcome in California
    to be over regulated , taxed to death , and now charged if they help uphold the law with respect to illegal immigrants. ICE is considered the enemy and tent cities are all the rage . Well done Gerry Clown .
    $98 billion to be spent by a near bankrupt State .
    No wonder the exodus is accelerating .

    • Sunny Jim says:
      8 years ago

      It’s know as FUFO in the UK, f*ck up and f*ck off!

      • Sonnyhill says:
        8 years ago

        Ontario has much in common with the UK.
        There’s gold at the end of the career arc for socialist leaders.

    • David Lewis says:
      8 years ago

      Gator, I remember you posting this information before and I’m glad you have done so again. Note that your calculations are based on $68.4 billon and now the project is up to $77.9 billon.

      I’ll repeat what I have said before. I was living sixty miles south of San Francisco during the BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit, a rail system) project. The projected ended costing a hundred times more than the voters were told when they approved it. My uncle is a civil engineer for the federal government. At the time one of the main motivations for public transportation was to save energy. My uncle had access to a federal study that estimated BART would have to be used for fifty years to break even with the energy required to build the system.

  4. Gator says:
    8 years ago

    I ran figures a few years ago…

    The California High-Speed Rail Authority has estimated the project’s year-of-expenditure cost at $68.4 billion (2011 estimate).

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_High-Speed_RailWikipedia

    SFO to LAX Round-trip = $137

    http://www.orbitz.com/flights/from-San_Francisco-to-Los_Angeles.o4468.d4309/

    499,270,073 Tickets

    More than 6 million people fly between the Los Angeles basin and San Francisco Bay per year

    http://cahsr.blogspot.com/2009/10/la-sf-nations-second-busiest-air-route.html

    For round trip, cut that in half to 3 million.

    So my back of the envelope figures show that for the cost of building the high speed rail, you could fly everyone for free for roughly 166 years.

    Of course most projects like this can double in actual cost.

    But who is counting?

    I am. Now we can fly everyone for over 238 years.

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • new zealand energy basinNew Zealand Moves to Shield Fossil Fuel Companies From Climate Lawfare
    May 15, 2026
    New Zealand moves to block lawsuits holding fossil fuel companies liable for climate damage, citing business uncertainty and limits of tort law. […]
  • north sea oil rigMiliband Vows Permanent North Sea Drilling Shutdown, Legal Ban On Fracking
    May 14, 2026
    Labour's energy bill permanently bans new North Sea drilling and fracking, defying industry leaders who warn the timing couldn't be worse. […]
  • french farmer protestFrench Farmers Protest En Masse Over Soaring Diesel Costs, Green Fuel Taxes
    May 14, 2026
    French farmers blockaded a Lyon refinery, protesting diesel costs, fuel taxes, and EU trade policies that are flooding markets with cheap imports. […]
  • corn ethanol fuel foodGroups Blast E15 Bill As Hidden Tax Disguised As Consumer Choice
    May 14, 2026
    Free-market groups urge Congress to reject adding E15 to gasoline year-round, which would burden consumers, refiners, and engines. […]
  • bangor daily HLClimate ‘Migrants’ From Texas Feel ‘Lucky’ To Find Vagrant Feces On Maine Porch
    May 13, 2026
    Climate 'migrants' who fled Texas for Maine's progressive politics say they feel 'lucky' after waking to find human feces on their porch. […]
  • nyc power demandNew York’s Green Energy Gamble Looking A Lot Like Cuba’s Grid Collapse
    May 13, 2026
    New York’s push toward solar and wind while aging natural gas plants deteriorate could bring reliability problems, higher costs, and blackout risks. […]
  • miliband field turbinesEd Miliband’s Ludicrous Net Zero Plan Is Costing UK Taxpayers Billions
    May 13, 2026
    Ed Miliband's wind farms can't deliver electricity to consumers—so Britain pays them to turn off while natural gas generation and emissions rise. […]
  • starmer construction siteReport: Britain Faces 160,000 Job Losses This Year Over Soaring Energy Costs
    May 13, 2026
    A major economic forecaster predicts over 160,000 UK job losses this year, driven by rising energy costs and Labour's Climate Change Levy increases. […]
  • Algiers Point, New OrleansMeteorologist Debunks Guardian’s Sea Level Panic: New Orleans Isn’t Drowning
    May 12, 2026
    The Guardian claims New Orleans must evacuate due to sea level rise. Tide gauge data tells a very different story—one of land sinking, not drowning. […]
  • science class professorGerman Physicist Dismantles The Climate Crisis Narrative One Claim At A Time
    May 12, 2026
    German physicist Dr. Bernd Fleischmann systematically challenges climate alarmism, arguing CO2 benefits outweigh risks and warming favors humanity. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky