• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

New Numbers For Bullet Train To Nowhere Reveal Calif. State Near Collapse

by P. Gardner Goldsmith
March 14, 2018, 2:41 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
8
Last year, Calif. Democrats raised gas taxes and vehicle fees by $5.2 billion a year. Nearly 30% is going toward non-infrastructure projects.

Until recently, many California leftists claimed that their Great Leader, Democrat Governor Jerry Brown, had created a surplus for his loving people.

Perhaps they felt it was a way to show conservative Republicans that a government could be known as a leftie stronghold while balancing budgets.

There’s just one problem with this, something that was revealed last year by Hans Bader, of CNS news, and is now being exposed even further.

Turns out, the great “surplus” became a deficit when 2016 spending numbers were “discovered” to have been undercounted by $1.9 billion, and, this week, the Brown government revealed that the magical “bullet train” being built by the government between Los Angeles and San Francisco will run, get this, an estimated $77.9 billion by the time the first few trains might possibly run in 2029.

That’s an increase of $13 billion from estimates provided two years ago.

The price of the California bullet train project jumped sharply Friday when the state rail authority announced that the cost of connecting Los Angeles to San Francisco would be $77.3 billion and could rise as high as $98.1 billion — an uptick of at least $13 billion from estimates two years ago.

Can you imagine a private company doing this? Of course not. But the California government can take people’s money without asking them to voluntarily offer it; they can take the cash through taxation, which Brown and his allies have been doing, seemingly with pride.

Just last year, Jerry signed a bill that increased gas taxes and vehicle fees by $5.2 billion annually, and many residents believed the money would be reserved for highway and bridge repairs.

But as Republican California State Assemblymember Melissa Melendez noted last year, nearly 30% is not being used on roads and bridges.

Some is being spent on university projects, some for job training for felons, and some for parks, to name just a few divergences. Oh, and then there’s the money that will go towards, yeah, you got it, trains.

And the Democrat-led California Assembly also raised the state income tax last year, bringing the top level to 13.3% for the next decade.

Yet this group of politicians wants to shell out between $77.3 and $98.1 billion on a “high speed” rail system between the City of Angels and the Gate City of San Fran.

No wonder businesses and residents have been fleeing the state in droves.

But this is not just a run-of-the-mill example of bad governance or legislative tomfoolery that should be lined up beside so many others in the US and world history.

This story includes in it a historical and economic lesson we can learn, and that lesson is about public rail projects.

Guess what?

Public rail is always, without exception, a loser. From the time of the boondoggle “Transcontinental Railway” that was years over time and millions over budget thanks to government cronyism.

And this tradition has not stopped. As I noted in my book, “Live Free or Die”, when factoring for tax subsidies and loans, no public rail line in history has run in the black.

In fact, almost anyone familiar with how politicians and special interests work can note that rail projects are ways to force taxpayers who don’t live near the lines and will likely not use them to subsidize rail users, rail builders, and employees, and business interests located near the rail stops.

The story hasn’t changed since the days of the Transcontinental Railroad when workers would knowingly plant rails on permafrost, aware that the land would shift in the spring, and they would be able to charge more to the feds for conducting the repairs.

If a rail line is a good economic investment, there is no need to subsidize it. If there is a market for the transportation, customers will be attracted, and private investors will line up to loan start-up cash.

In fact, this is precisely what happened during the time of the Transcontinental Railroad.

What many Americans don’t know is that while the feds were bungling and pocketing huge collections of taxpayer money for themselves, the privately run Great Northern Railway successfully beat the government at its own game, creating a transcontinental rail under time and on budget.

Nothing in politics changes.

But it’s important to look at the contemporary stories and try not to get frustrated. Rather, we can use them as catapults to go back into history and learn, then spread that information to others…

…Even as collectivists tell us how “financially responsible” they are in places like California.

Read more at MRCtv

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026

Comments 8

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    The Chattanooga Choo Choo,The Orage Blossem Special,The Wabash Cannonball,The City of new Orleans,The Soul Train and the A Train all going somewhere the Moonbeam Pork Train going nowhere

    Reply
  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    Moonbeam wants his high speed Choo Choo so he can move more illegal aliens(Future Democratic Voters)all over the state

    Reply
    • Al Shelton says:
      8 years ago

      Date of opening 2029.
      Moonbeam will be dead by then. [maybe]
      SF and LA will only have homeless people riding back and forth as all the businesses will be gone.. ;^D

      Reply
  3. Amber says:
    8 years ago

    For some reasons politicians like Gerry Brown do have a very good sense for when the barn door is going to knock them on their ass
    and conveniently slip out just before the event .
    California is the new fly over country. Businesses are cowards they only go where they are welcome . They are welcome in California
    to be over regulated , taxed to death , and now charged if they help uphold the law with respect to illegal immigrants. ICE is considered the enemy and tent cities are all the rage . Well done Gerry Clown .
    $98 billion to be spent by a near bankrupt State .
    No wonder the exodus is accelerating .

    Reply
    • Sunny Jim says:
      8 years ago

      It’s know as FUFO in the UK, f*ck up and f*ck off!

      Reply
      • Sonnyhill says:
        8 years ago

        Ontario has much in common with the UK.
        There’s gold at the end of the career arc for socialist leaders.

        Reply
    • David Lewis says:
      8 years ago

      Gator, I remember you posting this information before and I’m glad you have done so again. Note that your calculations are based on $68.4 billon and now the project is up to $77.9 billon.

      I’ll repeat what I have said before. I was living sixty miles south of San Francisco during the BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit, a rail system) project. The projected ended costing a hundred times more than the voters were told when they approved it. My uncle is a civil engineer for the federal government. At the time one of the main motivations for public transportation was to save energy. My uncle had access to a federal study that estimated BART would have to be used for fifty years to break even with the energy required to build the system.

      Reply
  4. Gator says:
    8 years ago

    I ran figures a few years ago…

    The California High-Speed Rail Authority has estimated the project’s year-of-expenditure cost at $68.4 billion (2011 estimate).

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_High-Speed_RailWikipedia

    SFO to LAX Round-trip = $137

    http://www.orbitz.com/flights/from-San_Francisco-to-Los_Angeles.o4468.d4309/

    499,270,073 Tickets

    More than 6 million people fly between the Los Angeles basin and San Francisco Bay per year

    http://cahsr.blogspot.com/2009/10/la-sf-nations-second-busiest-air-route.html

    For round trip, cut that in half to 3 million.

    So my back of the envelope figures show that for the cost of building the high speed rail, you could fly everyone for free for roughly 166 years.

    Of course most projects like this can double in actual cost.

    But who is counting?

    I am. Now we can fly everyone for over 238 years.

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • golden eagleWyoming’s Golden Eagles Face Extinction As Wind Farms Multiply
    Jun 4, 2026
    Wyoming's golden eagle population has dropped 30% in 20 years. Wind farms are the culprit, and the Endangered Species Act may be the only fix. […]
  • UK electric car chargingCarmakers To Miliband: Your Net Zero Targets Don’t Add Up
    Jun 4, 2026
    Carmakers say Miliband's carbon budget assumes 95% of auto sales will be electric by 2030 — a target the industry calls unrealistic given current demand. […]
  • judge influenceHouse Judiciary Escalates Climate Lawfare Probe With First Subpoena
    Jun 4, 2026
    The House Judiciary Committee has issued its first subpoena in the probe into a coordinated litigation campaign targeting American energy companies. […]
  • offshore wind block islandBlue-State AGs Sue Trump Admin Over $1 Billion Deal To Kill Offshore Wind Leases
    Jun 4, 2026
    Seven state AGs, led by NY's Letitia James, are suing the Trump administration over a $1 billion deal that canceled offshore wind leases. […]
  • eu pres President ursula von der LeyenThe EU Used Climate Alarmism To Grab Green Power — Now It’s Stuck With Both
    Jun 3, 2026
    The EU leveraged climate alarmism to centralize power from member states — now it's trapped by the green ideology it can't abandon. […]
  • calif highway trafficCalifornia Unions Exploit Climate Fears To Block Return-To-Office Mandate
    Jun 3, 2026
    California unions are threatening a CEQA lawsuit over commute emissions to block Newsom's return-to-office mandate for state workers. […]
  • antarctic glacierThe Thwaites ‘Doomsday’ Glacier Isn’t Collapsing — The Daily Mail’s Story Is
    Jun 3, 2026
    The Daily Mail's 'Doomsday Glacier' collapse scare ignores scale, ocean physics, and the fact that climate models aren't measurements. […]
  • lng tanker theaterIndia Needs Energy At Scale — Not More Climate Theater
    Jun 3, 2026
    Rubio's India visit signals a pathway to unprecedented fossil fuel trade — and an end to climate theater diplomacy. […]
  • models vs realityAP’s Climate Doomsday Forecast Is Built On Computer Models, Not Real Data
    Jun 2, 2026
    AP's five-year climate forecast relies on 200 runs of 13 models, not real-world data — and natural factors explain most of the projected warming. […]
  • miliband commonsBritons Told To ‘Cycle More, Eat Less Meat’ To Hit Net Zero Targets
    Jun 2, 2026
    The Climate Change Committee predicts that Britons will have to cycle more and eat less meat to 'balance' the UK's seventh ‘Carbon Budget’. […]

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky