• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

As Heat Waves Expose Renewable’s Shortfalls, Anti-Nuclear Governments Embrace Nuclear

by Michael Shellenberger
6 years ago
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
3

nuclear powerEven anti-nuclear governments are turning to nuclear power to deal with record-breaking heat waves, which have increased demand for electricity to power air conditioning around the world.

To meet rising electricity demand, South Korea’s anti-nuclear government announced last week that it would increase the number of operating nuclear reactors from 14 to 19, even restarting two reactors that were scheduled to be closed this summer for maintenance.

Anti-nuclear Germany has had to rely heavily on its remaining nuclear plants and its coal plants even during daylight hours when Germany’s solar panels are at maximum production. The reason? Very little wind.

In June, Taiwan’s anti-nuclear government was forced to restart a closed nuclear reactor in order to meet demand. Last year, the island nation suffered its worst power outage ever when seven million homes were left without electricity.

In anticipation of high electricity demand during the summer, the Japanese government accelerated the restarting of nuclear reactors closed after Fukushima. Nuclear capacity has nearly doubled since March.

The reliance on nuclear power plants by anti-nuclear governments shows the limits of renewables and conservation

After the 2011 Fukushima panic, Japan shuttered its nuclear plants and invested heavily in conservation and efficiency. The limits of those efforts were felt this week as sales of air conditioners by a leading retailer increased 70 percent compared to last year.

California has spent billions on conservation and efficiency programs but found itself this week pleading with residents to reduce energy consumption during the heat wave. “Plan somewhere to go if you lose power,” a National Weather Service expert warned.

California’s solar has been of limited use because as reported the San Diego Union-Tribune, “solar production falls off when the sun goes down and energy users come home from work, turn on their air conditioners and use appliances that suck up a lot of power, such as washer/dryers.”

And solar panels produce less electricity in heat waves. “According to the manufacturer standards, a 25°C (77°F) temperature indicates the peak of the optimum temperature range of solar panels,” solar experts say. “It is when solar cells are able to absorb sunlight with maximum efficiency.”

“Summer temperatures that can reach 50°C, combined with the build-up of dust, can reduce the efficiency of a photovoltaic panel by more than half” in hot climates, reported The Times of London last year.

Wholesale electricity prices in California rose to $1,000 per megawatt-hour — a whopping 30 times more expensive than last year’s average price.

South Korea’s news media have criticized the government for underestimating electricity demand in order to justify its anti-nuclear policies.

“Such failures in predicting power demand suggest the government arbitrarily lowered its estimated demand to back up its logic for phasing out nuclear plants,” editorialized a South Korean newspaper.

The irony is that many anti-nuclear governments justify their policies as addressing climate change, which may be contributing to the heat wave.

“This is what the future looks like for us,” a Los Angeles utility spokesperson warned. “We are seeing real extremes in the way of what we’re having to deal with.”

“The government’s rush to phase out nuclear has increased electricity from plants using coal and natural gas,” the South Korean newspaper editorialize, “which pose serious threats to the environment.”

Will the heat wave serve as a wake-up call to anti-nuclear governments?

Taiwan may be the first test case. It is set to close a nuclear plant in December, but memories of this summer’s heat and last summer’s blackouts may prevent that.

California’s anti-nuclear government is moving ahead with plans to close Diablo Canyon nuclear plant, which provides nine percent of the state’s electricity, by 2025.

In California, electricity prices have risen five times faster than in rest of the U.S. since 2011, when the state began expanding the deployment of renewables and closed a nuclear plant.

Cost increases even in normal conditions are worsened by the loss of nuclear; it stands to reason that during severe events such as this summer’s heat waves, cost increases will be especially severe.

The heat wave forced even anti-nuclear groups like Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), which supports closing Diablo Canyon, to acknowledge that “Demand for power [is] only going up.”

“Besides the fact that utilities must serve 50 million more Americans than they did just 20 years ago,” editorialized EDF, “each of us relies more on electricity. Whether it’s our iPhones and laptops or the cloud services we connect them to, our personal and business lives are completely dependent on power and a reliable grid.”

And that’s not to mention the accelerating transition to electric cars, whose demand for electricity could grow 300-fold between 2016 and 2040.

Read more at Forbes Blogs

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Truth
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Del
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki iconOdnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • Yummly
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related

Next Post

Toronto Sun OpEd: 'Good Riddance To Cap-And-Trade'

Comments 3

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    Phooie on Greenpeace,Phooie on the Clamshell Alliance,Phooie on Hanoi Jane Fonda and her putrid movie THE CHINA SYNDROME and Phooie on the Anti-Nucular Actvists and Phooie on the Nucular Weapons Free Zone idiots in their sandals Go Back to your Southern California Camp of weirdos

  2. David Lewis says:
    6 years ago

    “The reliance on nuclear power plants by anti-nuclear governments shows the limits of renewables and conservation.”

    I would like to highlight the hypocrisy of saying that nuclear is not renewable energy. With the use of breeder reactors to make plutonium-239 out of uranium-238, the supply of fuel would last a very, very long time, making nuclear a renewable. In addition, for those who believe in the climate change fraud, nuclear has no green house emissions. It is clean energy.

    However, if your goal is to force de-industrialization by making energy scarce and expensive, then nuclear energy is bad news.

    I should point out that even including the power plant accidents, nuclear is safest form of energy. If you are building dams, windmills, fossil fuel power plants, there are occasionally fatal accidents. The same is true of building nuclear plants. However, nuclear plants produce so much energy that per unit of energy their fatality rate is lower.

  3. Mjw says:
    6 years ago

    California: Plan somewhere to go if you lose power.
    Great idea, as long as it doesn’t involve Trams, trains or driving through areas with traffic lights

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Media Ignorantly Blame Climate Change For Heat-Related Deaths During Hajj Pilgrimage
    Jun 28, 2024
    The deaths of more than 1,300 people at this year’s Hajj attributed to heat is tragic, but historically not uncommon. […]
  • UN secretary general antonio guterresThe UN Emperor Has No Science (Just Mangled Metaphors To Pitch Extreme Climate Alarmism)
    Jun 28, 2024
    History will record that the United Nations and its emperor as the greatest organizational perpetrators of junk science in modern times. […]
  • Fayette power plantSupreme Court Strikes Down EPA Rule Targeting Downwind Power Plant Pollution
    Jun 27, 2024
    The Supreme Court blocked an Environmental Protection Agency rule cracking down on power plant pollution. […]
  • protest climate justice riotClimate Lawfare: Using The Courts To Dictate And Enforce Green Energy Policies
    Jun 27, 2024
    Lawfare is becoming a key tactic of the climate cult because they can’t get their wish list enacted through the democratic process. […]
  • cattle cows livestockDenmark Rolls Out ‘Flatulence Tax’ For Livestock To Ostensibly Slash Methane Emissions
    Jun 27, 2024
    Starting in 2030, Danish livestock farmers will have to pay for the greenhouse gases their cows, sheep and pigs produce. […]
  • beach summer heatAn Expert’s Forecast Of Central Europe’s ‘Summer Of Hell’ Already Off-Track
    Jun 27, 2024
    A suspect biologist had predicted a 'summer of hell with almost complete certainty.' It hasn’t materialized yet. […]
  • harris eco adGreenwashing Kamala Harris: How The Veep Casts Herself As An Eco-Justice Crusader
    Jun 27, 2024
    Kamala Harris has long cast herself as a fearless pioneer of social and environmental justice. Her record shows something far different. […]
  • biden solar farmSolar Execs Who Gave Millions To Dems And Lobbied For Subsidies Are Swimming In Cash
    Jun 26, 2024
    Execs and investors in a solar company who donated heavily to Dems and lobbied for Biden’s big climate tax bill ended up as major winners when it passed. […]
  • power plant refineryWhat the Media Won’t Tell You About Fossil Fuels And The Green Energy Transition
    Jun 26, 2024
    Trillions of taxpayer dollars have been spent on a supposed 'green transition' that isn’t occurring at all. In fact, the opposite is happening. […]
  • jennifer granholmBiden DOE Farming Out Home Appliance Rules To Left-Wing Climate Activist Groups
    Jun 26, 2024
    Climate activist groups and far-left green groups helped craft the DOE's aggressive regulations targeting popular household appliances. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Portions © 2024 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Climate Change Dispatch