• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

EPA Head Lee Zeldin Axes Hated Start-Stop Rule After Years Of Driver Backlash

Trump is making cars fun to drive again.

by I & I Editorial Board
April 17, 2026, 7:39 AM
in Energy, News and Opinion, Politics
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
5

start stop button
Has there ever been an automobile feature as widely despised as the stop-start system that the Obama administration forced on the country? Unlikely. Which is why new federal action that kills the requirement is cause for celebration. [some emphasis, links added]

The “feature,” which is the wrong word for what’s truly a nuisance, automatically shuts off a car’s internal-combustion engine when it is idling at a red light or stuck in traffic. It restarts the engine when either the foot comes off the brake pedal or the accelerator is pressed.

The action is jerky — it too often feels like a minor collision — distracting and tiring, producing a driving experience that’s more wearisome than enjoyable.

It’s also likely that the system increases wear on a car’s starter and battery, forcing owners to replace them sooner than they otherwise would — though its few supporters claim this isn’t so.

The Obama administration coerced the industry into including the function in every new car to improve fuel efficiency and cut emissions.

Automakers weren’t required to make it standard, but it became a mandate of sorts in 2012 because the government gave them a credit for adding the confounded gadget to their lineups.

To the relief of many, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin eliminated the credit in February as part of the Trump administration’s unwinding of useless and counterproductive Obama-era environmental rules.

Last week, Zeldin followed up with an announcement that the Trump EPA had “removed the ridiculous climate participation trophy the Obama Admin created to get this hated feature installed. The incentives for manufacturers to make your car die at every red light and stop sign have now been ELIMINATED!”

It “is arguably one of the most annoying features of any new car,” says Motor1.com. Slashgear reports that the frustration caused by the function “is so severe that you can find ‘Autostop Eliminators’ selling online.”

“Some people (automotive PR folk and EPA representatives, mostly) will tell you that it’s a great idea, saving you hundreds in fuel expenses each year,” says CarBuzz.

“Others would like to reach through the dashboard and rip the control module out with their bare hands to keep it from ever shutting the engine down at a red light again.”

Read rest at Issues & Insights

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Energy

Professor Makes Stunning Discovery: ‘Absolutely, 100 percent, Offshore Wind Kills Whales’

Jul 15, 2024
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026

Comments 5

  1. Victor F says:
    4 months ago

    Now Zeldin/EPA should begin proceedings that will require all auto manufacturers to permanently disable the feature upon demand by the consumer.

    Reply
  2. Terry Shipman says:
    4 months ago

    In 1974 I bought my first new car, a Chevrolet. That was the year the hated seatbelt interlock system was mandated. You couldn’t start you car unless your seatbelt was fastened. Some people paid thousands of dollars to have the system (illegally) disabled. I tried an experiment and unplugged the weight sensors underneath the driver and passenger front seats. Worked like a charm. As far as my car knew there was never anyone sitting behind the wheel so it allowed my car to start without fastening the seatbelt.

    I hasten to add that I have always used the seatbelt back then if they were installed in the vehicle. I just didn’t want the government mandating that my car wouldn’t start if I didn’t follow their rules.

    If I recall correctly 1974 was the only year the system was mandated. There was such a public backlash that the regulation was repealed.

    Reply
    • Steve Bunten says:
      4 months ago

      My roommate at the time bought a new VW Rabbit and what he did was click the seatbelt behind him which still allowed the car to know the seatbelt was clicked but he wasn’t buckled in. Because his Rabbit got very good fuel mileage I bought one too but since I was good with wearing a seatbelt I wasn’t concerned about the lockout. But I hated the federal government forcing behavior that isn’t the government’s business.

      Today’s cars are almost as bad. The car starts w/o the belt clicked but if you don’t have the seatbelt clicked in the car will continue to bother you that you haven’t clicked in your belt.

      Reply
  3. Richard Greene says:
    4 months ago

    A stop-start feature typically saves a driver between 3% and 10% on fuel costs annually. For an average driver traveling 15,000 miles a year in a vehicle that gets 20 mpg, this translates to roughly 25 to 50 gallons of gasoline saved each year.

    For an auto manufacturer (OEM), the incremental cost to add a basic “light” stop-start feature to a new vehicle typically ranges from $300 to $400 per unit. While some estimates suggest high-end or more complex “medium” systems can add between $500 and $700 to a vehicle’s manufacturing cost

    the cost seemed too high relative to the benefits

    While there is no single industry-wide percentage for all drivers, recent survey data and environmental policy shifts suggest that a vast majority of drivers—up to 90%—dislike or are frustrated by the auto stop-start feature

    Reply
    • Steve Bunten says:
      4 months ago

      I have a CRV Hybrid which does have the engine stop while at traffic lights but it uses the battery to start going before the engine kicks in. But because the battery is first engaged you don’t have that lag time like you do with strictly ICE cars as the starter gets the engine going.

      Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Subscribe To CCD Via Email!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get instant notifications. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • project 29 blueprintSoros-Funded Group Unveils Eco-Extremist ‘Project 2029’ Climate Agenda
    Aug 3, 2026
    A Soros-funded think tank's "Project 2029" proposes a climate agenda critics say would dramatically expand government power. […]
  • canada forest protectedHow Canada’s ‘Green’ Forest Policies Are Making Wildfires Worse
    Jul 31, 2026
    Canada's 'green' forest policies are fueling bigger wildfires, more smoke, and higher costs, and Americans are paying the price. […]
  • Summer is still summer. Childhood is still childhood.NPR Turns Ordinary Summer Weather Into Climate Anxiety For Children
    Jul 31, 2026
    NPR turns ordinary summer weather into climate anxiety, using emotional anecdotes instead of evidence to convince children they're losing summer. […]
  • Marketing says Net Zero. Reality says natural gas powers AI.Big Tech’s Net Zero Fantasy Collides With AI Reality
    Jul 31, 2026
    Big Tech promised net zero by 2030, but AI data centers are driving emissions higher, exposing the gap between climate rhetoric and reality. […]
  • Britain sacrificed a great deal without changing the outcome.Britain’s Net Zero Crusade Changed Everything—Except the Climate
    Jul 31, 2026
    Britain's net zero crusade imposed huge economic costs while doing little for the climate. It's time to scrap net zero and adapt. […]
  • Human-caused "wildfires" happen far more often than those sparked by lightning or heat, officials say.Nine In Ten ‘Wildfires’ Started By Human Activity, French Government Admits
    Jul 30, 2026
    French officials reveal nine in ten wildfires are started by human activity, not climate change, as arsonists and careless individuals face prosecution. […]
  • clouds sun hotSolar Activity Is The Main Driver Of Earth’s Climate, Scientists Say
    Jul 30, 2026
    New research argues solar activity, not modern warming trends, is the dominant driver of Earth's climate. […]
  • AG dana nesselMichigan Legislature Rebukes State AG On Climate Lawsuit In Latest Budget
    Jul 30, 2026
    Michigan's new budget bars AG Dana Nessel from suing energy firms without legislative approval, a bipartisan rebuke of her climate lawsuit. […]
  • large solar farmMinnesota Wants ‘Clean’ Solar Energy — Built By Chinese Slave Labor
    Jul 29, 2026
    Minnesota's transition away from coal leans heavily on solar panels tied to forced labor in China's Xinjiang region. […]
  • uk direct air vacuumDirect Air Capture: Labour’s Maddest Net Zero Bet, Funded By Taxpayers
    Jul 29, 2026
    Days before leaving office, Ed Miliband committed the UK to becoming a global leader in direct air capture—at eye-watering cost. […]

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Sunset on Net Zero

Canary in a Climate World

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky