• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

EPA Head Lee Zeldin Axes Hated Start-Stop Rule After Years Of Driver Backlash

Trump is making cars fun to drive again.

by I & I Editorial Board
April 17, 2026, 7:39 AM
in Energy, News and Opinion, Politics
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
5

start stop button
Has there ever been an automobile feature as widely despised as the stop-start system that the Obama administration forced on the country? Unlikely. Which is why new federal action that kills the requirement is cause for celebration. [some emphasis, links added]

The “feature,” which is the wrong word for what’s truly a nuisance, automatically shuts off a car’s internal-combustion engine when it is idling at a red light or stuck in traffic. It restarts the engine when either the foot comes off the brake pedal or the accelerator is pressed.

The action is jerky — it too often feels like a minor collision — distracting and tiring, producing a driving experience that’s more wearisome than enjoyable.

It’s also likely that the system increases wear on a car’s starter and battery, forcing owners to replace them sooner than they otherwise would — though its few supporters claim this isn’t so.

The Obama administration coerced the industry into including the function in every new car to improve fuel efficiency and cut emissions.

Automakers weren’t required to make it standard, but it became a mandate of sorts in 2012 because the government gave them a credit for adding the confounded gadget to their lineups.

To the relief of many, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin eliminated the credit in February as part of the Trump administration’s unwinding of useless and counterproductive Obama-era environmental rules.

Last week, Zeldin followed up with an announcement that the Trump EPA had “removed the ridiculous climate participation trophy the Obama Admin created to get this hated feature installed. The incentives for manufacturers to make your car die at every red light and stop sign have now been ELIMINATED!”

It “is arguably one of the most annoying features of any new car,” says Motor1.com. Slashgear reports that the frustration caused by the function “is so severe that you can find ‘Autostop Eliminators’ selling online.”

“Some people (automotive PR folk and EPA representatives, mostly) will tell you that it’s a great idea, saving you hundreds in fuel expenses each year,” says CarBuzz.

“Others would like to reach through the dashboard and rip the control module out with their bare hands to keep it from ever shutting the engine down at a red light again.”

Read rest at Issues & Insights

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Energy

Professor Makes Stunning Discovery: ‘Absolutely, 100 percent, Offshore Wind Kills Whales’

Jul 15, 2024
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026

Comments 5

  1. Victor F says:
    3 months ago

    Now Zeldin/EPA should begin proceedings that will require all auto manufacturers to permanently disable the feature upon demand by the consumer.

    Reply
  2. Terry Shipman says:
    3 months ago

    In 1974 I bought my first new car, a Chevrolet. That was the year the hated seatbelt interlock system was mandated. You couldn’t start you car unless your seatbelt was fastened. Some people paid thousands of dollars to have the system (illegally) disabled. I tried an experiment and unplugged the weight sensors underneath the driver and passenger front seats. Worked like a charm. As far as my car knew there was never anyone sitting behind the wheel so it allowed my car to start without fastening the seatbelt.

    I hasten to add that I have always used the seatbelt back then if they were installed in the vehicle. I just didn’t want the government mandating that my car wouldn’t start if I didn’t follow their rules.

    If I recall correctly 1974 was the only year the system was mandated. There was such a public backlash that the regulation was repealed.

    Reply
    • Steve Bunten says:
      3 months ago

      My roommate at the time bought a new VW Rabbit and what he did was click the seatbelt behind him which still allowed the car to know the seatbelt was clicked but he wasn’t buckled in. Because his Rabbit got very good fuel mileage I bought one too but since I was good with wearing a seatbelt I wasn’t concerned about the lockout. But I hated the federal government forcing behavior that isn’t the government’s business.

      Today’s cars are almost as bad. The car starts w/o the belt clicked but if you don’t have the seatbelt clicked in the car will continue to bother you that you haven’t clicked in your belt.

      Reply
  3. Richard Greene says:
    3 months ago

    A stop-start feature typically saves a driver between 3% and 10% on fuel costs annually. For an average driver traveling 15,000 miles a year in a vehicle that gets 20 mpg, this translates to roughly 25 to 50 gallons of gasoline saved each year.

    For an auto manufacturer (OEM), the incremental cost to add a basic “light” stop-start feature to a new vehicle typically ranges from $300 to $400 per unit. While some estimates suggest high-end or more complex “medium” systems can add between $500 and $700 to a vehicle’s manufacturing cost

    the cost seemed too high relative to the benefits

    While there is no single industry-wide percentage for all drivers, recent survey data and environmental policy shifts suggest that a vast majority of drivers—up to 90%—dislike or are frustrated by the auto stop-start feature

    Reply
    • Steve Bunten says:
      3 months ago

      I have a CRV Hybrid which does have the engine stop while at traffic lights but it uses the battery to start going before the engine kicks in. But because the battery is first engaged you don’t have that lag time like you do with strictly ICE cars as the starter gets the engine going.

      Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • supreme court buildingAdvocates Call For Justice Kagan Investigation On Climate Change Bias
    Jul 13, 2026
    Advocates urged the Senate to investigate Justice Kagan’s potential conflict of interest in a major climate change case, and called for her recusal. […]
  • A tidal wave of legal defeats is swamping climate lawfare.After Eight Years, Maryland’s Climate Lawsuits Die A Quiet Death
    Jul 13, 2026
    Maryland's Supreme Court dealt the climate litigation campaign a clear defeat, rejecting three lawsuits as SCOTUS eyes a similar case. […]
  • cartoon battery storage costsRenewable Advocates’ Battery Bet Proves Cost Prohibitive: Report
    Jul 13, 2026
    A new report finds a wind-solar-battery grid would cost ratepayers $4 trillion over 20 years — far more than emissions benefits justify. […]
  • Washington Monument and National Mall on a blistering hot summer day in July.Climate Change Wasn’t Behind July Fourth’s Extreme Heat — Attribution Science Was
    Jul 13, 2026
    USA Today claims climate change caused deadly July heat waves and floods, but the data tells a very different story. […]
  • german farmer protestEurope’s Net Zero Reckoning Will Reveal Its Real Climate Priorities
    Jul 13, 2026
    Brussels' electrification plan is a litmus test for the EU's retreat from net zero orthodoxy amid war, populism, and rising energy costs. […]
  • macron air conditioningFatal Snobbery: France Would Rather Let Citizens Die Than Use Air Conditioning
    Jul 10, 2026
    French authorities would rather citizens suffer through deadly heatwaves than embrace air conditioning, a French blogger argues. […]
  • climate church38 Experts Say ‘Climate Alarmism’ Has Become A Profit-Driven Religion
    Jul 10, 2026
    38 experts reveal how climate alarmism has become a religion, complete with dogma, sacred texts, and heretics who dare question the science. […]
  • 1911 heatwave NYCNYT Claims Heat Wave Impossible Without Climate Change. History Begs To Differ
    Jul 10, 2026
    The NYT blames climate change for an 'impossible' heat wave. A meteorologist finds 150 years of history that says otherwise. […]
  • G7 groups shot 2026Hormuz Crisis Forces G7 To Choose Energy Security Over Climate Dogma
    Jul 9, 2026
    The G7 summit in Évian prioritized G7 energy security over climate timelines, as Canada pivots toward expanded oil and gas amid Hormuz Strait disruptions. […]
  • france summer sunNo, Paris, U.S. Air Conditioners Did Not Cause Europe’s Heat Wave
    Jul 9, 2026
    Europe's ruling elites choose to stop families and businesses from installing AC or having affordable electricity to operate them—not America. […]

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Sunset on Net Zero

Canary in a Climate World

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky