Congress is currently debating extending federal tax subsidies for high-end electric cars, which could mean more taxpayer dollars effectively going towards buying add-ons and perks for luxury vehicles, according to an analysis by The Daily Caller News Foundation.
Buyers of these cars can get a $7,500 tax credit that’s often worth more than extra perks and add-ons.
For example, someone who buys a Jaguar I-Pace HSE, which can start at $80,000, could use their $7,500 tax credit to effectively purchase a “Carbon Fiber Exterior Pack” valued at $4,390.
A Tesla Model S with a list price of $78,000 can also earn its buyer a $7,500 tax credit, which can go towards “Enhanced Autopilot” features valued at $5,000.
Or a Tesla buyer could use their tax credit to purchase 21-inch “Sonic Carbon Twin Turbine Wheels” valued at $4,500.
Tax credits for buying a BMW i8, priced at $160,000, could be used to offset the cost of the “Laserlight” feature valued at $6,300.
“They’re basically subsidizing rich people, but mostly rich Californians,” Tom Pyle, president of the American Energy Alliance (AEA) that opposes electric car tax credits, told TheDCNF in an interview. Pyle called it a “reverse Robin Hood tax credit.”
Federal tax subsidies are set to phase out for several major electric car automakers in the next year, including General Motors and Tesla.
Tax credits range from $2,500 to $7,500, depending on the car, but phase out for buyers once companies produce 200,000 electric vehicles.
Electric car buyers claim the credit in their tax returns, meaning tax subsidies would effectively go towards paying for add-ons to electric vehicles worth up to $7,500.
AEA was one of 30 conservative groups in September to sign a letter to Congress opposing extending electric car subsidies.
Some Republican lawmakers have joined conservative activists in calling for electric car subsidies to end. The Trump administration has also taken aim at electric car subsidies in the wake of GM’s announcements it would lay off thousands of workers.
Wyoming Republican Sen. John Barrasso introduced a bill to end the tax credits and slap a fee on electric vehicles, which would go towards the Highway Trust Fund. Electric vehicles currently don’t pay gas taxes that fuel federal highway spending.
“All should contribute to maintain them. My bill supports the Highway Trust Fund by making sure all drivers pay into the account that improves America’s roads,” Barrasso said in a statement in October.
GM and Tesla already hit the 200,000 production mark, and the two companies are part of the EV Drive Coalition, which is also made up of electric vehicle trade associations and environmental groups.
The Coalition called federal electric vehicle subsidies “a significant purchase factor for car buyers” and “essential to the continued development of the EV market.” The Coalition also challenged the argument that electric car subsidies primarily benefit the wealthy.
“We reject that argument. So does the data,” Trevor Francis, spokesman for the EV Drive Coalition, told TheDCNF via email.
“The EV tax credit benefits all consumers at all income levels,” Francis said. “EVs are cheaper to keep on the road, also benefiting all income levels.”
However, it’s true that high-income households benefit more from electric vehicles subsidies. A February study by the Pacific Research Institute, for instance, found 79 percent of electric car tax credits were claimed by households making more than $100,000 a year.
Roughly 60,000 tax filers claimed electric vehicles subsidies on tax returns in 2016 and it was “disproportionately claimed by higher-income households,” according to the Tax Foundation.
The Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that, even with the current tax credit phase-out, electric car subsidies would cost $7.5 billion over the next four years.
“Yes, it’s true that some of them are purchased by the wealthy, but that is only a part of the story,” Joe Levin, the executive director of the advocacy group Plug In America, which is also part of the EV Drive Coalition.
“Also, as more are produced, the prices have been steadily coming down, so this will be even less of an issue in the future,” Levin told TheDCNF in an email.
In November, Plug In America called for the 200,000-car cap on subsidies to be eliminated. The group did not specifically endorse any of the proposals in Congress but suggested there were elements of two they would “be supportive of,” The Washington Examiner reported.
Legislation introduced by outgoing Nevada Senator Dean Heller, a Republican, would lift the subsidy cap and phase out tax credits in 2022.
A House bill from Democratic Vermont Rep. Peter Welch would completely remove the cap for the next ten years.
Read more at Daily Caller
So, because electric car prices are allegedly going to go down in the future, then maybe someone other than the rich might benefit, so that is why we should continue to subsidize luxury car sales today?!
I’ll take a pass on that.
If it is such a great idea to have a battery operated car, then it should sell on its own, instead of the government paying people to buy them.
When they use the phrase “disproportionately claimed by higher-income households” it’s likely to mean that virtually all of the tax credit claims were from those households, probably on the order of 95-99%
Our welfare “subsidies” help people buy electric vehicles which means we are part owners of those vehicles. You own that tail light, so go ahead and kick it, real hard. There is no law preventing us from kicking our own property.