A coalition of 18 energy and consumer advocacy organizations are filing comments with the Department of Energy (DOE) on Monday, arguing the agency’s rules cracking down on gas stoves would harm Americans.
Led by the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), the groups argued the regulations on stovetops, which the DOE introduced in early February, would compromise consumer choice and are therefore “arbitrary and capricious” while having minimal impact on climate change. [emphasis, links added]
The comment letter largely focused on compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), which mandates the federal government implement energy efficiency measures while not harming consumer choice.
“EPCA does not mandate a new energy conservation standard for cooking products but permits one only if it benefits consumers. This is not the case here,” the groups wrote.
“The proposed rule would almost certainly compromise some of the features that gas stove users want, and all for the sake of saving an insignificant amount of energy.”
“The agency’s exaggerated claims of climate change benefits do not alter the fact that the proposed rule violates the consumer protections in the statute,” they continued. “For these reasons, we believe the proposed rule should be withdrawn.”
According to the letter, the EPCA prohibits the DOE from setting an efficiency standard that would “sacrifice any desired product characteristics.”
However, the stovetop rule would likely limit the use of so-called high-input rate burners, which are larger burners often used for boiling water, searing, or stir-frying.
It would also limit gas stoves from utilizing smaller low-heat burners used for simmering, meaning the overall range of burner types on stoves would be narrowed considerably.
In addition, the DOE rule proposes to limit stoves’ heavy or continuous grates that are often cast iron and used for handling heavier pots.
“Ostensibly, these DOE efficiency standards are supposed to benefit consumers. That’s the way the law is written,” Ben Lieberman, a CEI senior fellow who helped draft the comments, told Fox News Digital in an interview. “But they’re clearly being done as part of the climate agenda, especially this agenda to electrify everything.”
“On the surface, this is an efficiency standard. I see it as being done in a way that will create disadvantages for gas stoves in order for them to comply,” Lieberman continued. “So, it’s not a ban on gas stoves, but it’s [removing] some of the features that people like about gas stoves. Some of the characteristics they like about those gas — those may have to be eliminated.”
Lieberman also argued the DOE’s purported emissions savings from the regulations would be negligible and cited a Heritage Foundation analysis that found the DOE’s projected avoidance of 19.6 million metric tons of carbon dioxide from the gas stove rule would result in temperature mitigation of just 0.0004 degrees Celsius by 2050 and 0.0009 degrees Celsius by 2100.
“There [are] not just the economic concerns, but also questions whether — if their goal is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions — [if this is] a smart way of going about it,” he continued. “I think there’s a serious question there as well.”
On Feb. 1, the DOE proposed the regulations, saying they would go into effect in 2027 and save Americans up to $1.7 billion while curbing greenhouse gas emissions.
“The full range of gas stoves absolutely is not affected,” Granholm remarked at a House hearing in March.
The proposal, meanwhile, came less than a month after a President Biden-appointed member of the little-known Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) made headlines when he told Bloomberg in early January that a gas stove ban was “on the table” given the product’s purported impacts on health.
The White House later denounced a ban, but the CPSC said it would proceed with taking in public feedback on gas stove safety.
And over the last several months, meanwhile, the DOE has introduced a series of other energy-efficiency regulations impacting various home appliances including air conditioners, ovens, clothes washers, and refrigerators.
Critics have blasted the rules as federal overreach and unnecessary given that the industry has improved technology without government intervention.
Read rest at Fox News
Like with Clinton(Bill)and Obama Biden bases everything on Politics and Junk Science Global Warming/Climate Change is a lot like Evolution/Darwinism unproven theories being taught as truth in the schools
Eat bugs and freeze, peasants.
So if were forced to eat bugs over this whole scam what will the Birds, Bats, Frogs and Spiders eat? Maybe Enviromentalists?