• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Biden Is Cooking Up Regs That Would Ban 96% Of Gas Stoves, Senator Warns

by Thomas Catenacci
February 24, 2023, 2:23 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
5

granholm presserSen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., warned in a letter to Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm (pictured) this week that regulations recently proposed by her agency would ban up to 96% of the gas-powered stoves currently available to Americans.

Daines noted in the letter sent Wednesday that the Department of Energy (DOE) itself acknowledges that just 4% of the current gas stove market share would meet the stringent rules governing the efficiency levels of gas stoves, effectively banning the vast majority of products being sold. [emphasis, links added]

The DOE issued the proposed rule on Feb. 1, shortly after the Biden administration was slammed for appearing to move ahead with a gas stove ban.

“The Department clearly states in the Proposed Rule … that only 4% of the current market share meet the extremely high new proposed standard,” Daines wrote to Granholm.

“This means that, according to the Department’s own analysis published in the Proposed Rule, 96% of existing gas cooking tops would be banned from future manufacturing and sales.”

“Obviously, this contradicts President Biden’s position as stated in the hearing by an assistant secretary of the Department that issued the rule,” he continued.

On Feb. 16, Andrew Light, the DOE’s assistant secretary of energy for international affairs, said President Biden was not in favor of banning gas stoves in response to questions from Daines during a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing.

The Montana lawmaker wrote in his letter that Light’s comments appeared to run counter to the agency’s own proposal.

He also noted that, in a “suspicious coincidence,” the DOE issued different data that seemed to contradict information in the Feb. 1 proposed rule immediately after the hearing with Light.

“This has led to greater confusion among lawmakers, manufacturers, and consumers. It is extremely important, as I stated during the hearing, that the public understands the effect of the Proposed Rule so they are both able to make official comments and prepare for what could be a substantial reduction in gas cooking appliances available to consumers,” Daines continued.

“When there are differing and conflicting data points and when statements during multiple congressional hearings are not being answered effectively, then it is incumbent on the Department to clarify these issues for congressional members and alert consumers and manufacturers of the real impacts of a proposed rule.”

Daines concluded the letter by requesting the DOE brief lawmakers and staff members on the impacts of the gas stove rule before finalizing it.

Daines’ concerns come after a Biden-appointed member of the little-known Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) made headlines when he told Bloomberg in early January that a gas stove ban was “on the table” given the product’s purported impacts on health.

The Bloomberg article highlighted a study partially funded by the Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) that linked gas stove usage to childhood asthma.

After widespread criticism from industry groups and Republican lawmakers, the White House eventually came out against a gas stove ban, saying it wouldn’t support such a measure. Granholm called the idea of a ban “ridiculous.”

However, Granholm tweeted a link to the RMI study on Jan. 4, saying “we can and must FIX this” and has privately met with RMI officials, according to her internal calendar.

And, despite Granholm’s comments, the DOE pushed forward with the new restrictions on gas stove usage.

Read more at Fox News

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024

Comments 5

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    3 years ago

    Biden and abuse of the power of office clearly chows he is not worthy of any job in the Government and therefore should be voted out of office and back to his Basement

    Reply
  2. Auru K says:
    3 years ago

    Reducing the cooking gas consumption is not good . After banning electronic appliances demand will be increase and it will take more electricity. Most of the harmful gas emissions are due to electricity production as it use coal, fossil fuel, oil etc. The global warming issue are already high and this can make situation worst.
    For more visit us on Energy Environmental Solutions http://sourcetester.org/

    Reply
  3. David Lewis says:
    3 years ago

    Banning gas stoves by administrative action is a clear over reach of authority. Such major action can only be implemented by an act of Congress. Biden continues to think that as president he has the same power that Hitler did. Banning gas stoves by administrative action will certainly be over turned by the Supreme Court.

    Banning gas stoves has the same impact as the attempt to ban fossil fuel cars. It shifts the burden to the electric grids. There is no effort to boost the capacity of our country’s grids to handle these increased loads. In fact, the capacity of these grids are being down graded by replacing high density reliable fossil fuel plants with low density unreliable wind and solar.

    Reply
  4. Spurwing Plover says:
    3 years ago

    And they use fraudulent studies Junk Science and Politics just like they have done in the past. Biden is basing this all on Junk Science and Politics farer all he is Chinas/Globalists Puppet he dances for them when they pull his strings

    Reply
  5. hunterson7 says:
    3 years ago

    These government workers are from the same culture that gave us the ineffective, anti-scientific and deadly covid policies. Stop Them. Now. Defund the bureacratic agencies.

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Subscribe To CCD Via Email!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get instant notifications. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • GGRF gold bars vaultFull D.C. Circuit Reinstates Biden’s $20B Climate Slush Fund
    Aug 7, 2026
    The full D.C. Circuit revived billions in Biden-era climate grants that Trump's EPA sought to claw back and Congress later repealed. […]
  • galveston hurricane aftermathNAS Report Claims CO2 Emissions Are Driving Extreme Weather—To Bolster Lawfare
    Aug 7, 2026
    An NAS report attributes extreme weather to CO2 emissions while offering climate litigators new tools to calculate damages and causation. […]
  • supreme court buildingSupreme Court To Open Next Term With Landmark Climate Case
    Aug 6, 2026
    The Supreme Court will open its next term with a landmark climate case that could determine the future of lawsuits targeting oil companies. […]
  • climate scare headlines mediaDecades Of Climate Change Lies Still Drive The Narrative
    Aug 6, 2026
    For nearly four decades, climate change lies have fueled fear despite repeated predictions of catastrophe that never came to pass. […]
  • cartoon warming study parodyStudy Claims ‘Dramatic’ Acceleration In Global Warming—After Adjusting The Data
    Aug 6, 2026
    ScienceDaily's global warming acceleration claim relies on statistically adjusted temperatures rather than the raw observational record. […]
  • Judge Sannes hears arguments challenging New York's Climate Change Superfund Act in federal court.Federal Judge Casts Doubt On New York’s Climate Superfund Law
    Aug 5, 2026
    A federal judge questioned whether New York's climate superfund law can impose retroactive liability on energy companies for worldwide emissions. […]
  • India is choosing economic growth over another round of net-zero promises.India Rejects Net Zero—And The Climate Cartel Barely Noticed
    Aug 5, 2026
    The world's most populous nation is putting affordable energy, industrial growth, and poverty reduction ahead of net-zero pledges. […]
  • The aftermath of a devastating wildfire that destroyed hundreds of homes in the Spokane area.‘Global Warming’ Strikes Again In Spokane — Otherwise Known As Arson
    Aug 5, 2026
    The arrest of a suspected arsonist undercuts claims that climate change was responsible for one of Washington's most destructive wildfire outbreaks. […]
  • shell totalenergies saleShell Ditches British Solar Farms In Net Zero Retreat
    Aug 4, 2026
    Shell is selling its British solar farm business as it retreats from net zero, watering down its 2030 target and dropping its 2035 low-carbon goal. […]
  • matcha green tea exportsNew Scientist Brews A Climate Scare Over Matcha—As Production Soars
    Aug 4, 2026
    New Scientist warns climate change is threatening matcha, but booming production, rising exports, and stable yields tell a different story. […]

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Sunset on Net Zero

Canary in a Climate World

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky