CCD Editor’s note: As someone who worked for a Fortune 500 company, speaking negatively about the company in public was an employee violation. Just like Amazon, they had policies in place to prevent exactly what these eco-driven workers are doing.
* * * * *
A group of Amazon employees says the company has threatened to fire them for speaking out against the company’s environmental policies.
In a statement posted to Twitter on Thursday, Amazon Employees for Climate Justice said that several employees were contacted by legal and HR representatives, who said they were in violation of the company’s external communications policy.
Maren Costa, a user experience designer, was one of the employees Amazon threatened to fire. In the statement, Costa said: “This is not the time to shoot the messengers. This is not the time to silence those who are speaking out.”
We must be able to speak up. Here is our press response to Amazon’s intimidation tactics. 3/ pic.twitter.com/7DqhCw09Yf
— Amazon Employees For Climate Justice (@AMZNforClimate) January 2, 2020
Two employees were told their roles would be terminated if they continued to speak out about Amazon’s business, a spokesperson for the group told CNBC.
Amazon also threatened to terminate Jamie Kowalski, a software development engineer, according to The Washington Post, which first reported the news on Thursday. Kowalski and Costa said they received letters from one of Amazon’s lawyers after speaking out publicly in October, the Post reported.
In the statement, the employee group claimed that Amazon changed its policy in September, claiming that the updated policy “requires employees to seek prior approval to speak about Amazon in any public forum while identified as an employee.”
However, Jaci Anderson, an Amazon spokesperson, said the company’s communications policy isn’t new.
In September, Amazon actually tried to make it easier for employees to speak out by adding a form on an internal web site where employees could seek approval; prior to that, they had to get direct approval from a senior vice president.
She added that employees are “encouraged to work within their teams” and can suggest “improvements to how we operate through those internal channels.”
Amazon employees have increasingly pressured the company to address its environmental impact.
At Amazon’s annual shareholder meeting in May, thousands of employees submitted a proposal asking Bezos to develop a comprehensive climate-change plan and reduce its carbon footprint, though it was ultimately rejected.
The proposal was built on an employee letter published in April that accused Amazon of donating to climate-delaying legislators and urged the company to transition away from fossil fuels.
In September, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos announced the company aims to rely on renewable energy entirely by 2030 and have net-zero carbon emissions by 2040. The plans were largely viewed as a response to employees’ demands.
The day after Bezos’ announcement, more than 1,000 employees walked out as part of the Global Climate Strike and to protest Amazon’s climate policies. [Their beef with Amazon has nothing to do with the environment. If it did, they wouldn’t have left work to protest the climate when you have a CEO caving to your demands. –CCD editor]
Read more at CNBC
Leave the carbon based economy.
Pretty simple. Only hypocrites would draw a paycheck from an existential threat.
Brilliant, they don’t believe the #ClimateScam #ClimateCrackpots either. More power their elbow!
The Enviromental Thought Police or make that the Eco-Warriors making sure everybody thinks as they do I am sure Hitler,Stalin and Mao would approve
Amazon’s policy is very typical. The aerospace company I worked for went further. It was against the company’s policy to talk the media at all without prior approval.
The statement that thousands of employees support Amazon taking more action on climate change is technically correct but extremely misleading. The letter was signed by 3,541 employees, yet Amazon employs 613,300 as of 2018. Doing the math, 0.577% of the employees signed the letter.
Reading their verbose complaint on Twitter, I notice they advocate for “climate justice” which I understand to be a code word for a wealth redistribution scheme of some sort.
I have followed politics for decades and was once the president of a club for one of the two major US political parties. In my experience, any time the liberals use the word “justice,” it translates into taking from the people who earn what they have in order to give to those who haven’t.