One Hundred Percent Of U.S. Warming Is Fake

Zeke and Nick and all the other apologists for NOAA data tampering claim that adjustments to US temperature are due to Time Of Observation Bias or some other sciencey sounding reason, But the reality is that the data is simply fake.

In 1989, NOAA reported no US warming since 1895.

U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend

So what has been happening since 1990? The measured NOAA data shows no warming.

But the adjusted data shows a lot of warming.

The adjustments form a familiar hockey stick of data tampering.

Let’s look at what NOAA is doing to make this happen. Since 1990, NOAA has been losing monthly temperature data at a phenomenal rate. When they don’t have real data, they simply make up fake data. Almost 50% of their “adjusted” data is now fake, but in 1991 it was only 16% fake.

I split up the NOAA adjusted (Final) data into two categories – “real” data has underlying thermometer data, and “fake” data has no underlying thermometer data. The “real” adjusted data shows very little warming.

Bu the fake adjusted data shows lots of warming.

The infilling of fake adjusted data (no underlying thermometer data) corrupts the US temperature data in a spectacular hockey stick.

But it is much worse than it seems. The graph below plots the real adjusted (blue) and fake adjusted (red) trends for all 1,200 USHCN stations. NOAA is consistently infilling missing cold temperatures with fake warm temperatures, across the board and across the country. How cynical can they get?

When confronted about their data tampering, they say “our algorithm works exactly as designed.”

In other words, the fraud is intentional. But I’m not done yet. The fraud is worse than it seems (if that is possible). Almost 50% of USHCN adjusted data is now fake, but they have only lost 25% of their data. So they are throwing out a large percentage of their measured data.

The next phase of my discovery process will be to find out what type of measured data they are throwing out and replacing with fake data. But it seems a safe bet that they are tossing measured cold data, and replacing it with fake hot data.

This is the biggest and most cynical scam in science history.

Read more at Real Climate Science

Comments (5)

  • Avatar

    Spurwing Plover


    All those so called scientists who faked the global warming data need to be fired from their jobs let them get jobs as troublemakers for Greenpeace

  • Avatar



    Falsifying information for financial gain is wire fraud. Without the “adjusted ”
    temperature data the case for man made up global warming would never have been launched . Without that false and misleading information there would be virtually no money in the form of grants, contracts , loan guarntees that resulted in a $Trillion dollar fraud .
    Sooner or later some scientist (s) will come forward with evidence they were bullied or coerced into producing that exaggerated warming data
    and/or knowingly misleading climate model projections to support the
    narrative of catastrophic global warming .
    When that happens and the architects are ID’d people will be going to jail
    just like the crooks at Enron and a host of other frauds .
    Over and over we hear about scientists who knew their livelihood would be negatively effected if they didn’t produce work supporting fear mongering supporting global warming . We need documented evidence that they were directed or strongly encouraged to bias their research to further those objectives . There should be plenty of it .
    From there the FBI and other law enforcement agencies can begin to pull on the string to unravel one of the biggest frauds in history .
    Wikileaks can provide another valuable public service to expose the biggest financial fraud ever .

  • Avatar

    David Lewis


    There is one proof that the climate change movement is nothing but a big scam that we often over look. If man made climate change were real, unaltered data would stand on its own and show us that. The fact that these researchers see the need to alter the data shows they know the case for climate change is at best very weak. If they know it is that weak, then the rest of can know this isn’t a problem to throw money.

    Another big weakness is Donald Trump. He is allowing this fraud to continue under his administration.

    • Avatar



      Confront them and they’ll claim they’re correcting the data, that man-made climate change was hidden by flaws. Didn’t they also claim that aerosols were hiding the warming?

      • Avatar

        R. Johnson


        No doubt NOAA and NASA have been corrupted. Our government spends BILLIONS annually on this fake problem–this must stop. The media has been more than willing partners in the fake climate change/AGW narrative. Peer review is a joke proving the scientific process has been abandoned. It will begin to reverse under President Trump but it will take time.

Comments are closed