I’d honestly like to know how these climate change activists and their groups get the support of politicians and lobbyists for things that are clearly more harmful to the environment than helpful, if you believe in climate change. [emphasis, links added]
According to the U.K. outlet The Telegraph, their government appears to be on the cusp of greenlighting experiments to block out the sun, or “dim sunlight,” to “prevent runaway climate change.”
The Telegraph reported:
“Outdoor field trials which could include injecting aerosols into the atmosphere, or brightening clouds to reflect sunshine, are being considered by scientists as a way to prevent runaway climate change.[…]
Geoengineering projects which seek to artificially alter the climate have proven controversial, with critics arguing they could bring damaging knock-on effects, as well as being an unhelpful distraction from lowering emissions.”
Okay, so…am I the only one who remembers back in the 1990s that climate activists told us that aerosols were harmful to the environment?
I remember more than one movie making fun of that point by going outside and spraying hairspray into the air.
Groups have even published studies as recently as 2023 saying how aerosols can be deemed “hazardous waste” if not disposed of properly, but do note the benefit of blocking sunlight that, in turn, could cool the surface.
However, isn’t the fact that aerosols [can] block out sunlight counterproductive to “saving the planet,” especially considering how many living organisms, including human beings, need sunlight to survive?
Humans can tolerate sunlight deprivation more than most other living things, but sunlight is essential to mental health and as a source of Vitamin D.
And think of the sentence used, “Geoengineering projects which seek to artificially alter the climate have proven controversial…”
They are admitting, whether they like it or not, that these climate people are trying to play God with the weather.
Something in me thinks this won’t work out well if implemented.
Top photo by Tom Gainor on Unsplash
Read more at MRCTV
I can think of a few countries around the equator that would like to do this.. What a joke. It’s no wonder the UK no longer matters on the world stage.
The use of aerosols for planet cooling was proposed early in the global warming movement. The idea was strongly rejected by the activists. At that time global warming was much more a tool to get agendas through that couldn’t make it on their own merit, such a forcing people out of their cars. I read a number of articles discussing proposed actions that said these should be done anyway even if there were no warming. Having an alternative to forcing reduction in green house gasses would weaken support for these other agendas. Now, since the early days of the global warming movement there has been substantial fear mongering and altering of climate data. The activists have fallen into the trap of believing their own propaganda, so for some the use of aerosols is called for.
Releasing aerosols has the potential for unintended consequences.
Seems like UK politicians are showing derangement due to lack of sunlight
British politicians are a danger to humanity. They must be stopped.
Blocking out the sun sounds like something some Mad Scientists from a Saturday Morning Cartoon would do and if the UK wants to try it where is Greenpeace to stop this madness?!