The Sunday Telegraph reports today that Parliament was misled into supporting Net Zero plans to decarbonize the economy.
The Climate Change Committee (CCC) told MPs that British households and businesses would face only a modest cost for reaching Net Zero emissions in 2050, but analysis of their financial models by the Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) shows that key assumptions were not credible even at the time the report was published.
The revelations come after the CCC spent two years and tens of thousands of pounds resisting attempts to have the Net Zero model spreadsheets released under Freedom of Information legislation. The Information Tribunal finally forced their disclosure in August this year.
The first results of the GWPF’s analysis focus on the Transport sector costings. The work reveals that the CCC’s claims that decarbonization could be achieved at no net cost were based on wildly optimistic and sometimes bizarre assumptions.
According to GWPF Deputy Director Andrew Montford:
“When they published their report in 2019, the CCC said that small electric car prices would have fallen to around £13,000 by 2021. However, the CCC’s figures for 2019 EV prices were wildly wrong at the time they published their report, so it’s unsurprising that the current cost of a small electric car is double, or even triple their estimate.”
If instead of the CCC’s optimistic assumptions, we project a realistic decline in EV costs, this adds a staggering £1.8 trillion to the cost of Net Zero, or £60,000 per household, and altogether wipes out the claimed net benefit of decarbonizing the transport sector.
Dr. Benny Peiser, GWPF director said:
“Lord Deben, chairman of the Climate Change Committee, told Parliament the Net Zero report was ‘the most seriously presented, costed effort’ – but it is now clear that the CCC’s costings were incomplete, biased, and grossly misleading.
Parliament was, in essence, misled and Net Zero was badly mis-sold. The public is now facing the price for that deception.”
In a striking new development, the Sunday Telegraph is also reporting that they were initially given misleading information by the CCC, in an attempt to cover up the error and prevent publication. Only repeated requests for clarification revealed the truth.
Dr. Peiser said that the CCC’s attempts to whitewash the matter meant that this supposedly independent advisor to the government could no longer be seen as a credible source:
“The CCC spent years trying to hide their absurd assumptions, and even after the Information Tribunal compelled them to release their spreadsheets, they tried to throw the Sunday Telegraph off the scent. I don’t think Parliament or the public can ever trust them again.”
Craig Mackinlay MP, chairman of the parliamentary Net Zero Scrutiny Group, told the Sunday Telegraph that the findings were “scandalous” and that Parliament had been “misled”.
The GWPF’s analysis of the CCC’s costings is ongoing, and further announcements are expected in the coming weeks.
Detailed findings
Cost of electric vehicles
The CCC’s model assumes that EV costs will fall by 36–59% between 2010 and 2050, depending on the category. The price of small EVs is assumed to fall from £26,000 to £11,000.
Actual 2021 small EV prices (see graph below) are typically around double the figures used by the CCC in the Net Zero Report.
It must have been obvious to the CCC that their assumed trajectory was wrong at the time the Net Zero report was published. The CCC’s 2019 figure was £14,666, around half the level seen in the marketplace at that time [1].
This can be illustrated by the history of the Nissan Leaf, the archetypal small EV.
The extremely optimistic assumptions made by the CCC about Electric Vehicles are crucially important to their overall cost estimates.
Simply changing the shape of the curve to a straight-line decline between 2019 and 2050, for all categories of EV, adds £0.7 trillion to the cost of Net-Zero.
With batteries now representing only around 25% of the consumer cost of an EV, future cost declines – if any – are likely to be incremental rather than revolutionary.
Indeed, there a significant upward cost pressures on EV prices due to increasing costs for energy and critical minerals.
Reducing the rate of decline to 3% per decade more than doubles the cost of Net Zero, amounting to a bill of £60,000 per household. Holding EV prices steady would increase the bill by £2.1 trillion, or £75,000 per household.
[1] All costs are in £2018, ex-VAT, and before deduction of any grants.
Press release: Climate Change Committee misled Parliament about the cost of Net Zero
How about the Net Zero the 0% of intelligence that comes from t he Globalists
Just in case some of these deluded idiots wonder how China is doing so well, this might be a hint. They don’t buy into any of this BS. They continue to build coal fired power stations to ensure China has the cheapest electricity in the world and the cheapest manufacturing costs. With this strategy as a base, all the other things look after themselves at the lowest cost as well.
And to think all of this nonsense is based on the religious belief that CO2 heats the planet and not the Sun. If this wasn’t true, it would be hilarious.