• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

‘Hoax!’ A Physicist’s Case Against The CO2-Driven Climate Narrative

Professor Throne’s new book Hoax! exposes flaws in the CO2 climate narrative and shows why fossil fuels don’t drive climate change.

by Petter Tuvnes, guest post
September 05, 2025, 12:51 PM
in Energy, News and Opinion, Politics, Science
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
5

Hoax Book Cover
Physicist Darwin Throne’s Hoax! Why Burning Fossil Fuels Doesn’t Cause Climate Change summarizes recent developments in climate science, including satellite data from NASA’s CERES program since 2000, and presents a new thermodynamic climate paradigm that aligns with reality—unlike the theories and models promoted by the UN’s IPCC.

There are countless books about climate, most claiming that burning carbon-based fuels like coal, oil, and gas—and the resulting rise in CO2, a vital plant nutrient—will drive changes in global temperature and climate.

This “greenhouse gas theory” is the focus of books such as Professor Koonin’s Unsettled. However, Koonin argues that trying to reduce CO2 is futile and that we should focus on adapting to climate change instead.

But what if the very hypothesis that CO2 drives climate is not just wrong, but a “hoax”, or bluff, as physicist Darwin Throne claims in his new book Hoax!?

The book begins by examining the greenhouse theory, highlighting errors and weaknesses that stretch back to its origins with Svante Arrhenius in 1896. Throne traces these flaws through to the work of 2021 Physics Nobel laureates Manabe and Wetherald, whose models, he argues, continued Arrhenius’s mistakes—errors also pointed out by Dr. Roy Clark (at SCC).

Unsurprisingly, the UN’s IPCC receives significant scrutiny. Its work is based on the greenhouse effect, where heat radiation from greenhouse gases is said to drive global warming—a concept called “radiative forcing.” Throne argues that this violates the laws of thermodynamics. Nobel laureate John Clauser even calls the greenhouse theory “pseudoscience.”

The book makes a clear case that CO2 does not control the climate, a position also echoed by leading atmospheric physicist Richard Lindzen, even though Lindzen otherwise supports the greenhouse theory.

When it comes to climate predictions, many scientists hedge their bets, suggesting that various consequences of assumed man-made global warming could trigger extreme weather and climate changes.

Throne documents that these claims are largely unsupported—something even the IPCC acknowledges in AR6 WG1, Chapter 12, where most extreme future weather changes are rated with “low confidence.”

Despite this uncertainty, politicians and the press continue to hype alarming climate scenarios. More realistic information, Throne notes, can be found from organizations such as CFACT, CO2coalition, and Clintel.

One important chapter highlights the work of Dr. Nikolov and Dr. Zeller, who show that the IPCC has misrepresented satellite measurements (CERES) since 2000 in a way that obscures their significance. The change in solar radiation reflected by clouds is presented in reverse, inflating the values of a decreasing anomaly.

In reality, reflection (albedo) has decreased, allowing more sunlight to reach the Earth’s surface as absorbed solar radiation (ASR). Throne argues that this increase in ASR can explain all warming since 2000—and possibly the last 45 years, according to other researchers like Nelson & Nelson.

Throne also reviews alternative explanations for global temperature. In chapters 3 and 4, he discusses the Ideal Gas Law (PV = nRT), showing that increased atmospheric pressure raises air temperature when volume is constant. This principle helps explain phenomena like the Foehn wind, where air descending into valleys from mountains heats up.

Higher pressure leads to more frequent molecular collisions, increasing temperature—a kinetic process that plays a major role in global circulation systems such as the Hadley cells.

Professor Holmes has shown that the temperatures of all planets with atmospheric pressure above 0.69 kPa (0.0068 atm) can be explained using the molar-mass version of the gas law (T = PM/Rρ) combined with the planet’s solar irradiance—completely without invoking the greenhouse effect.

Holmes notes, however, that temperature changes (anomalies) are not accounted for by the gas law and that albedo is underestimated in this framework.

One error in the book appears on page 109, where albedo is incorrectly defined. Full reflection (100% albedo) should have a value of 1, not 0, while zero reflection is correctly 0. Throne acknowledges the mistake and apologizes for the oversight.

Hoax! challenges the IPCC’s claim that Earth’s 15°C average temperature results from a 33°C greenhouse effect. Throne points out two major errors: first, the Earth is round, not a flat disk; second, comparisons must be made with the Moon, which has no atmosphere. Accounting for these factors, the actual atmospheric effect could be as high as 90°C.

Researchers Dr. Nikolov and Dr. Zeller have conducted extensive analyses that refute the greenhouse theory, instead proposing a thermodynamic climate paradigm in which albedo, atmospheric pressure, and solar radiation are key to accurately calculating global temperature.

Chapter 7, which covers Dr. Nikolov and Dr. Zeller’s (N&Z) new thermodynamic climate paradigm, is the most important part of the book.

Here, they thoroughly review how they applied dimensional and regression analysis to published official data from sources like NASA on celestial bodies with atmospheres. The result is a three-part mathematical equation accounting for 1) the Sun’s influence, 2) atmospheric pressure, and 3) albedo (reflection).

Greenhouse gases on the planets were included in the analyses, but the best results came without them, meaning any effect is so small it is irrelevant. The N&Z model matches 100% of global warming since 2000 and 83% of annual temperature changes, leaving no need for any “greenhouse theory.”

According to Throne, the recent rise in global temperature is primarily due to less cloud cover and more sunlight reaching Earth (ASR), a finding confirmed by NASA CERES satellite measurements. As the book concludes: “There is no global climate change due to the burning of fossil fuels!”

The book also briefly considers possible causes of changes in cloud cover, though no good explanation exists to date. It discusses the theories of Danish scientist Dr. Henrik Svensmark, who links cloud variations to cosmic radiation and solar wind.

Hoax! exposes errors in the “greenhouse theory” and offers an alternative, logical, and scientifically sound explanation for global temperature in a fairly straightforward way—though some background in physics helps. We cannot control global temperature or climate change; we can only adapt with better infrastructure, as Professor Koonin recommends in his book Unsettled.

“Hoax!” is available on Amazon as both an e-book and a 187-page paperback. The e-book costs $9.95 and is immediately available on PC or tablet. Highly recommended—well worth the ten bucks.

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Energy

Professor Makes Stunning Discovery: ‘Absolutely, 100 percent, Offshore Wind Kills Whales’

Jul 15, 2024
Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
News

Scientific Bombshell Undermines The Climate Doom Narrative

Oct 23, 2024

Comments 5

  1. David B. Russell says:
    6 months ago

    There has never been anything that demonstrates the existence or even the possibility of a radiative greenhouse effect in a greenhouse. How could anyone believe there could be such an effect in the open atmosphere?

    • Steve Bunten says:
      6 months ago

      Well, according to the esteemed (in his mind) Richard Greene 99.9% of “scientists” (don’t know who they are though) are certain that there are greenhouse gases.

  2. Richard Greene says:
    6 months ago

    99.9% of scientists have said there is a greenhouse effect since the late 1800s.

    In my 28 years of climate science reading, I have only discovered one scientist who denied the greenhouse effect.

    Greenhouse effect is downwelling infrared radiation and it is measured every day of the year.

    CERES does not say what the Hoax author says it does.

    Norman Loeb has described an “unprecedented” increase in Earth’s energy imbalance, the difference between the energy absorbed from the sun and the energy radiated back to space. In a 2021 study, he noted that this heating has doubled over the past 15 years.

    Norman Loeb:
    Title: Senior Technologist for Radiation Sciences
    Technical Focus Area: Climate Science
    Mission/Project: CERES
    Study Topics: Earth Radiation Budget, Climate Variability, Clouds, Climate Model Evaluation, Aerosol Radiative Forcing

    A much better article:

    5 forecasts early climate models got right – the evidence is all around you

    https://theconversation.com/5-forecasts-early-climate-models-got-right-the-evidence-is-all-around-you-263248

    https://theconversation.com/5-forecasts-early-climate-models-got-right-the-evidence-is-all-around-you-263248

  3. Graham McDonald says:
    6 months ago

    How long did it take you to read it, cover to cover? I’m not a ‘speed’ reader.

    • LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:
      6 months ago

      Gee, that book contains much of what I’ve been stating for a very long time…

      https://www.patriotaction.us/showthread.php?tid=2711

      … to Ritard Greene’s strident but futile and oh-so-hilarious protestations, because he wishes he was smart enough to even slightly grasp any of this, rather than his usual shilling for the AGW narrative, and his carrying out of his published vow to attack conservatives.

      Of course, Ritard Greene hasn’t read the book… and even if he had, he wouldn’t be able to understand the physics. His entire goal is to cosplay as a conservative while shilling for AGW in hopes of incrementalizing legitimate climate realists over to warmism, in further hopes of further incrementalizing them over to leftism. That’s why Ritard Greene attacks conservatives, and leaps to the defense of leftists… one must look at a leftist warmist’s actions, not their words… because leftist warmists lie. It’s what he does. LOL

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • coffee bean plantation thrivingClimate Alarm Brews False Coffee Crisis As Global Production Sets Records
    Mar 13, 2026
    An activist group's study claims warming is devastating coffee crops, but real data shows output has more than doubled globally since 1995. […]
  • Trump EPA Moves To Reverse Biden’s Climate-Fueled Crackdown On Device Sterilization Gas
    Mar 13, 2026
    Trump’s EPA moves to scrap Biden’s strict ethylene oxide rule, warning it risked medical device shortages while keeping longstanding emissions limits. […]
  • wind turbine blades landfillBarclays Report Warns Renewable Energy Could Become Next ‘Stranded Asset’
    Mar 13, 2026
    Barclays report warns renewables face stranded-asset risk as grid bottlenecks, curtailment, and energy security challenge Net Zero viability. […]
  • movie floods sea levelNew Study Finds 90% Of Sea Level Research Relies On Models, Not Real Measurements
    Mar 13, 2026
    A review of 385 studies finds 90% relied on model assumptions rather than real coastal measurements. […]
  • hochul press eventNY Assembly Won’t Ease Climate Law, Floats $500 Energy Rebates For Soaring Bills
    Mar 12, 2026
    Hochul seeks to scale back the CLCPA as NY Assembly proposes $500 energy rebates to offset rising utility costs. […]
  • ursula von der leyenEU Chief Admits Europe’s Nuclear Phaseout Was A ‘Strategic Mistake’
    Mar 12, 2026
    EU chief Ursula von der Leyen admits Europe’s nuclear phaseout was a “strategic mistake” that contributed to high energy prices and reliance on imports. […]
  • time magTIME’s ‘Faster Than Ever’ Warming Claim Collides With Satellite Temperature Data
    Mar 12, 2026
    Satellite temperature data show steady global warming since 1979 with no post-2015 acceleration, contradicting TIME’s “faster than ever” claim. […]
  • college theory vs realityClimate Change: Where Self-Proclaimed Experts Make Fools Of Themselves
    Mar 11, 2026
    Markets abandon green energy hype while universities and nonprofits keep pushing the climate crisis narrative. […]
  • polar bear summer iceNew Study Finds 20-Year Pause In Arctic Sea Ice Decline
    Mar 11, 2026
    New study finds Arctic sea ice decline paused for 20 years, with satellite data showing no statistically significant September drop since 2005. […]
  • america first refiningU.S. Greenlights First New Oil Refinery In 50 Years, Advances Nuclear Reactor Project
    Mar 11, 2026
    U.S. greenlights first new oil refinery in 50 years and approves a next-gen nuclear reactor as Trump pushes expanded energy production. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Climate prn book

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky