You’ve heard the phrase “Greenhouse Effect” a thousand times, but did you know the term is completely inaccurate when applied to the Earth’s atmosphere?
Our atmosphere is a non-linear dynamic system that simultaneously absorbs and emits energy that it receives from the sun.
There is no roof on the Earth, so the term makes no sense when describing the atmosphere. (video after the jump)
This incorrect analogy has helped to fuel climate change hysteria.
Read more at CFACT
Media Ignorantly Blame Climate Change For Heat-Related Deaths During Hajj Pilgrimage
The UN Emperor Has No Science (Just Mangled Metaphors To Pitch Extreme Climate Alarmism)
Supreme Court Strikes Down EPA Rule Targeting Downwind Power Plant Pollution
Climate Lawfare: Using The Courts To Dictate And Enforce Green Energy Policies
Denmark Rolls Out ‘Flatulence Tax’ For Livestock To Ostensibly Slash Methane Emissions
An Expert’s Forecast Of Central Europe’s ‘Summer Of Hell’ Already Off-Track
Greenwashing Kamala Harris: How The Veep Casts Herself As An Eco-Justice Crusader
Solar Execs Who Gave Millions To Dems And Lobbied For Subsidies Are Swimming In Cash
What the Media Won’t Tell You About Fossil Fuels And The Green Energy Transition
Biden DOE Farming Out Home Appliance Rules To Left-Wing Climate Activist Groups
Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.
The entire Global Warming/Climate Change Scam is one of the biggst hoaxes in the history of Mankind bigger then any other scam in the past
I’ve said for decades that it should be called an atmospheric effect, and exactly because there is no heat trapping roof on our atmosphere.
Greenhouse Effect? Nah! I prefer to call it the “Outhouse Effect”. It’s FOS, has to be repositioned regularly, and it stinks.
The Greenhouse effect sounds like another Al Gore bullshit line . The earth has a fever , the science is settled , all from a guy with virtually no scientific education just trying to make a buck . When the government failed to
legislate carbon offsets his fledgling business Chicago Climate Exchange was dumped fast to some poor dupes .
The Greenhouse effect sounds like another Al Gore bullshit line . The earth has a fever , the science is settled , all from a guy with virtually no scientific education just trying to make a buck . When the government failed to
legislate carbon offsets his fledgling business Chicago Climate Exchange was dumped fast to some poor dupes .
The Greenhouse effect sounds like another Al Gore bullshit line . The earth has a fever , the science is settled , all from a guy with virtually no scientific education just trying to make a buck . When the government failed to
legislate carbon offsets his fledgling business Chicago Climate Exchange was dumped fast to some poor dupes .
Yeah, he’s right about the “greenhouse” analogy, but completely wrong about any atmospheric “effect” from particular gases (namely CO2). This whole supposed mechanism directly violates the Laws of Thermodynamics. Nobody on Earth, despite spending 100’x of $billions has ever been able to demonstrate this “effect”. Why? .. because you can’t !! .. if you could, you could great a perpetuum mobile (perpetual motion machine), and we already know that is impossible. Simply put, the surface of our planet, which is the source of the IR that is causing the heating, cannot heat itself. Nothing can heat itself. But wait, isn’t the sun what is heating? .. yes, the sun provides the short wave radiation, but the surface is the source of the infrared (long wave) radiation that supposedly bounces off of so-called “greenhouse gases” to further heat the surface some more. That is a direct violation of the physical laws of our universe and simply cannot, under any circumstances, happen.
Whatever you want to call it .. it simply does NOT exist! .. don’t believe me? .. then prove it!!
The real test of any theory is does the data support it. In the case of anthropological climate change, it does not. However, we can type about this until our fingers are sore. As far as the political movement goes the “science is settled” and there is no need to discuss it.
The fact the “climate change movement” has gotten this far is amazing and disappointing. The scientific method has been battered unconscious by paid government hacks through data manipulation and outright fraud. Follow the money: Western governments view the movement as a potential tax pot-o-gold. Less powerful governments demand climate reparations for the so called damage inflicted by rich nations. UN is using “climate change” as a basis of world government. Protesters are simply being used to promote the “cause” of saving the earth.
When you hear or read “the science is settled” it’s a warning that an active Ponzi scheme is operating. Climate change movement: it’s all take and no give!
This is very good. You may like to read and review my working paper Quantum Mechanics and Raman Spectroscopy Refute Greenhouse Theory” found at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328927828_Quantum_Mechanics_and_Raman_Spectroscopy_Refute_Greenhouse_Theory I discovered we can now measure the quantum predicted spectra of nitrogen and oxygen (99 % of the dry atmosphere) with Raman laser Spectroscopy. Concentrations and temperatures of all the atmosphere’s gases can be measured by this technology. If Tyndall and others had the Raman Laser they would not be concluded what they did.
In a second paper I show the GHG are really and only the thermoelectric gases.
The Greenhouse Gases and Infrared Radiation Misconceived by Thermoelectric Transducers
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329311153_The_Greenhouse_Gases_and_Infrared_Radiation_Misconceived_by_Thermoelectric_Transducers
You can also refer to an article I wrote https://principia-scientific.org/settling-the-climate-woo-with-quantum-based-raman-spectroscopy/
Just to be clear: I am not confusing Raman Spectroscopy (RS) with the Raman effect. RS exploits the Raman effect to infer quantum predicted IR spectra.