Well, maybe we aren’t all going to die in 11 1/2 years, like some surrounding Australia’s Labour Party were insisting before the recent elections.
Hat-tip: reader Mary Brown
A new study appearing in the Journal of Weather and Climate Extremes titled “Historical extreme rainfall events in southeastern Australia” – led by LindenAshcroft, School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne – shows that much more extreme weather in terms of rainfall existed before 1900 in Melbourne, Sydney, and Adelaide.
Moreover, the authors found a “moderate and relatively stable relationship between El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and annual variations of total rainfall and the number of rainy days.”
What follows is the paper’s abstract (my emphasis):
Abstract
The cities of Melbourne, Sydney, and Adelaide are home to almost half of the Australian population and are often exposed to extreme rainfall events and high year-to-year rainfall variability.
However, the majority of studies into rainfall in these cities, and southeastern Australia, in general, are limited to the 20th century due to data availability.
In this study, we use rainfall data from a range of sources to examine four rainfall indices for Melbourne, Sydney, and Adelaide for 1839–2017.
We derive the total rainfall, the number of rain days, wettest day of the month and the simple daily intensity index for each city over the past 178 years, and find relatively consistent relationships between all indices despite potential data quality issues associated with the historical data.
We identify several extreme daily rainfall events in the pre-1900 period in Sydney and Melbourne that warrant further examination as they appear to be more extreme than anything in the modern record.
We find a moderate and relatively stable relationship between El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and annual variations of total rainfall and the number of rain days at all three cities over the research period, but no relationship between ENSO and the annual wettest day, in agreement with other studies using shorter time series.”
Note how the authors mention how “extreme daily rainfall events in the pre-1900 period” in Sydney and Melbourne “appear to be more extreme than anything in the modern record.”
So despite the constant claims of worsening weather globally, objective analyses of longer-term data consistently show that weather in terms of hurricanes, tornadoes, extreme precipitation, etc. was just as bad or even worse in the preindustrial times. It’s natural, stupid.
All the pagan-minded rain-dancing, socialism and wealth destruction, and redistribution aren’t going to change our weather.
Read more at No Tricks Zone
So actual scientifically generated data point that will be ignored by the Liberal Alarmist Median (LAMe) and all the so-called Climate Scientists.
All those various Eco-Wacko groups and all those who use Global Warming/Climate Change should be sued for making false and misleading ads and especialy target the EDF for exploiting Children in their fake ads
Didn’t the MSM and sheep politicians get the memo ? AOC was only “joking ” .
Watch her video and you’ll see what an amazing comedian she is .
Oh yeah the people in NYC just don’t get her cleverness . Amazon gone ?
Can’t they take a joke ?
Look out Madcow , AOC is on deck .
Even if the heavy rain fall before 1900 had been known, it would not have made a difference to the climate alarmists. Their typical mode of operation is to take a moderate event that seems unusual. Ignore the fact that it has happened before. Then blame the moderate event on climate change claiming this is an urgent reason for drastic political action.
Here in Northern California(The sate of Jefferson)We had snow in our Mountains in the County of Siskiyou in May so is it because of Global Warming/Climate Change?