Leaders of the Clintel Group of world scientists and professionals will attend the U.N. Climate Change Conference (COP25), which starts in Madrid today (2 December) and runs for twelve long days. (The Climate Summit was shifted suddenly to Spain after Chile canceled because of violent riots in Santiago.)
Clintel will present its “No Climate Emergency” petition at the Climate Reality Forum. This petition has already been presented to the U.N. secretary-general, the European Commission, and the European Parliament.
Voting on a motion promoting a climate emergency declaration (in opposition to the Clintel statement), over one-third of the members of the E.U. Parliament voted for “No Climate Emergency.” This shows there is significant opposition to alarmism, even in the E.U.
The Climate Summit is expected to attract up to 25,000 high-flying delegates and hangers-on from 197 member-countries. Most will not arrive using bicycles, sailing boats, or gliders — they will burn hydrocarbons.
Desperate to spread their “Climate Emergency” alarmism, delegates will try to force high energy costs and rationing on us while they waste it conspicuously themselves.
Clintel says computerized global temperature simulation models are unfit for the purpose of setting climate policies — they have consistently run hot for 20 years.
The real global climate has warm and cold cycles. Current global temperatures are about as warm as the Medieval Warm Era (which was followed by the Little Ice Age).
There is no uniform global temperature at any place or any time, and no one knows what ideal temperature we should aim for — the Frigid Zone would probably like it warmer; the Torrid Zone would probably like it cooler.
We need to take heed of climate history and energy realities, both neglected in alarmist/U.N. propaganda. Too many U.N. “scientific” reports are tinkered with by officials before release and are designed to alarm rather than inform.
For too long, we have been forced to listen to biased academics (chasing research funds), energy speculators (chasing government subsidies and tax breaks), alarmist journalists (chasing sensations), noisy children (chasing days off school), and greenish politicians (chasing votes).
It’s time to stop the chasing.
We need a grown-up debate allowing all sides to present their science on “man-made global warming.”
Note: Viv Forbes CLINTEL ambassador in Australia.
Read more at American Thinker
“We need a grown-up debate allowing all sides to present their science on “man-made global warming.”
Well ya!! It’s starting point.
Given the crazy ass nature of their “cure” one should demand, not hope for, a sane and rational and public debate of their science and scientific methods to be reviewed by independent scientists.
If anthropogenic global warming is tied to CO2 produced from burning fossil fuels then there should be irrefutable proof of that based in Physics, the scientific study of matter and energy.
Show us “the science”. If, as “claimed”, there really is a scientific “consensus” as proof of anthropogenic caused global cooling-warming-change-crisis due to man’s burning of fossil fuels then there MUST be physical scientific principles, mathematical models, experiments and/or observations justifying these claims as well as credible independent scientific verification. Now may be the time to convene an independent scientific government panel to review the science behind the scientific “consensus” of anthropogenic global warming???
Fact: The man-made global warming alarmists are politicians first, not scientists.
Fact: Man-made global warming alarmism is part of a progressive globalist agenda.
Fact: Man-made global warming alarmists would very much like to vote on their politically based motion of a GLOBAL BINDING “climate emergency declaration” without ever presenting “their” science.
Fact: Man-made global warming alarmists do, and will continue to, resort to character assassination and debunking sane and rational attempts at scientific review or debate as conspiracy theories. And, as we have seen in recent years, increased funding for promoting discord and violence around the globe.
Fact: Man-made global warming alarmists will never have a scientific debate supporting their claims, predictions, LIES because they DO NOT HAVE SCIENCE to back up their claims.
Fact: The man-made global warming alarmists steadfast refusal to debate the scientific merit of their claims virtually invalidates the very “scientific consensus” (or ANY SCIENCE) they claim to have.
But. If we are going to have a debate maybe we should focus on the root cause, the progressive governing body attempting to reorder this world to THEIR view.
The year 2020 will mark the 75th anniversary of the United Nations and their catastrophic failure to bring about world peace and prosperity over the past 3/4 century in pursuit of their progressive agenda. It’s well past time for the U.S. to leave the UN.
So, CNN reports that 100% of scientists support the climate change dogma, and we have a report signed by 700 scientists stating that there is no climate crisis. A hundred percent obviously means something different in CNN’s world.
We should be aware of what the goals are for COP 25. Money has already been mentioned and is perhaps is the biggest issue.
Another is to increase the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) of the Paris Treaty. The NDCs are the pledges made by nations for emission reductions. Countries were supposed to submit pledges to reduce these at the September 23 meeting but that didn’t happen so now they think it will in COP 25. There will be a review of what is considered adequate.
There is the goal to work out the details of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement which deals with emission trading between countries.
There is a goal to impose or increase taxes on the use of fossil fuels.
We need to remember that that the UN, and those behind climate change have the actual goal of conrtolling people, not changing climate, which they could not do if they wanted to. At one point in the past couple years one member of the UN said they no longer care if there is global warming, as long as people thing there is, and they can control them. They have in the last few months admitted they overestimated the CO2 factor. Then admitted they had not factored in sun cycle in any of the climate change models!
We have climate which is driven by Sun cycles, not human beings, nor Congress. It is nto to be equpated with pollution. We are now in a Grand Solar Minimum, limited sun spot activity, which leads to a few years of colder weather, until the next Sun cycle. That is it, no one on Earth can control this cycle which has happened for hundred of tousand of years. Only snake oil salemen would pretend to do so, at their own profit.
We also have currently another cycle, Earth magnetic poles switching. They have moved about 14 mile per yer, 40 miles this year, and as they move toward the equator will speed up. This is not a hard pole, it is the movement of the plasma and the poles pop up at new locations. This also could lead to cole weather, radar disruption (already seen) and communication issues.
All the time and money poured into COP25, UN Agenda’s 21 and 30, and faux Green New Deal (just Agenda 21 plagerized) are just taxpayers using their own money to lead to their own control being handed over to a bunch of global elites. This includes, as part of the UN goal,the end of capitalism, private property ownership, and, banning read meat consumption, all declared “unsustainable. Dr. Ileana Paugh, a professor in the US, formerly of Romania, has written of what complying with these mandates has done to her own homeland. She describes windmills where farmland once grew crops, population density with people herded into urban high rises, no parking for cars, continuous brown outs, leading to no A/C nor reliable refrigeration. Tom DeWeese of American Policy Center anticipated these mandates in the US over 25 years ago, and sounded a warning.
When will we become thinking citizens and research for ourselves, instead of repeating talking points of those who would spend our money for what they cannot control. with control over us being their real goal?