In the German video titled “Klima-Hysterie wissenschaftlich widerlegt?” (Climate Hysteria Scientifically Refuted?), Dr. Bernd Fleischmann presents a critical view of current climate policies and the scientific consensus on climate change. [some emphasis, links added]
Overuse of already refuted climate models
Firstly, Fleischmann questions the reliability of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and the IPCC, accusing them of using “alarmist models” to influence political decisions, such as the German Federal Constitutional Court’s climate ruling [01:40].
Positive climate findings get buried
On the subject of “tipping points”, Dr. Fleischmann argues that the concept is statistically and historically refuted. He claims that original tipping points, like the greening of the Sahara (which he views as positive), were removed from updates because they weren’t “alarmist enough” [03:53].
Moreover, Fleichmann asserts that climate models are based on “ignorance,” citing the wide range of temperature predictions (1–6°C) as proof that scientists do not actually know the impact of CO2 [05:30].
CO2 is an overall benefit
On the subject of CO2, Fleischmann argues that CO2 has a marginal effect on temperature (maximum 1°C increase if doubled) and is primarily beneficial for plant growth, leading to a “greening” of the planet, especially in the Sahel zone [05:51], [25:15].
Change is mainly driven by more powerful, natural factors
Fleischmann attributes recent warming not to greenhouse gases, but to changes in absorbed solar radiation (less reflection) and natural oceanic cycles like El Niño [09:58].
He points out that historical temperature data (from 1850) is unreliable because there were almost no measurement stations in the Southern Hemisphere or Africa at that time, making high-precision global temperature claims “propaganda” [19:02].
Wind farms are causing far more damage than benefit
Fleischmann further argues that wind farms actually cause local warming and soil drying by disrupting air layers and preventing the ground from cooling at night [31:02].
He explains how infrasound from wind turbines can make people ill by affecting “piezo channels” in human cells and the brain [34:55].
He also claims they kill thousands of tons of insects and numerous birds/bats annually [40:43].
Mass wealth redistribution scheme
Citing PIK Director Ottmar Edenhofer, Fleischmann shows that climate policy is actually a tool for the redistribution of global wealth from the middle class to the “super-rich” [36:46], [39:02].
Concerning the media, he accuses them (ARD, ZDF, Süddeutsche Zeitung) of spreading lies and failing to report scientific facts that contradict the climate narrative [21:07], [27:46].
“No climate crisis”
In summary, Fleischmann concludes that there is no “climate crisis,” warming is generally better for humanity than cooling (citing fewer deaths from heat than cold), and the “energy transition” is a scientific and economic mistake [40:19].
Top image generated by AI.
Read more at No Tricks Zone
Fleischmann attributes recent warming not to greenhouse gases, but to changes in absorbed solar radiation (less reflection) and natural oceanic cycles like El Niño
global warming has fifty years is from greenhouse gases. a reduction of air pollution and a reduction of the percentage of cloudiness
el ninos have nothing to do with it
the long run of 50 years the temporary heat spikes from el ninos are completely offset by the heat reductions from la ninas
enso is temperature neutral
other than that correction it’s refreshing to hear somebody celebrating CO2 emissions
which i have been doing since 1997