• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

#FakeNews: Lancet Ties ‘Seven Million Deaths’ to Climate Change

by THOMAS D. WILLIAMS, PH.D.
May 14, 2018, 9:00 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
8

The prestigious Lancet medical journal has published a disingenuous editorial falsely attributing seven million deaths from air pollution to “climate change.”

“The effects of climate change are inextricably entwined with health,” the May 12 editorial begins, “ranging from the WHO estimate of 7 million deaths from breathing polluted air indoors and outdoors” to a series of other harmful consequences.

This statement is patently false, and the Lancet editors know it.

The World Health Organization (WHO) report to which the editorial refers makes no mention of climate change and speaks only of the adverse health effects of polluted air, a different phenomenon.

According to the WHO report, “around 7 million people die every year from exposure to fine particles in polluted air that penetrate deep into the lungs and cardiovascular system, causing diseases including stroke, heart disease, lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases and respiratory infections, including pneumonia.”

All of these potentially fatal pathologies are caused by “exposure to fine particles in polluted air” and not by global warming.

In its infographic on the causes of air pollution, the WHO lists six sources of dangerous fine particulate matter, none of which is related to climate change. The six sources of air pollution are industry and energy supply, dust, agricultural practices, transport, waste management, and household energy.

Among the six solutions proposed by WHO for combatting air pollution, not one of them touches on carbon dioxide emissions, for the simple reason that CO2 is not a pollutant and is not harmful to human health. Unlike pollutants, carbon dioxide is odorless, colorless, and most importantly, non-toxic.

The WHO database collects annual mean concentrations of fine particulate matter. Those that pose “the greatest risks to human health” are sulfate, nitrates, and black carbon, they observe.

The WHO report notes that deaths relating to air pollution occur overwhelmingly in third-world countries where large segments of the population “still do not have access to clean cooking fuels and technologies in their homes.”

“More than 90% of air pollution-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, mainly in Asia and Africa,” WHO declares, “followed by low- and middle-income countries of the Eastern Mediterranean region, Europe and the Americas.”

“The highest ambient air pollution levels are in the Eastern Mediterranean Region and in South-East Asia, with annual mean levels often exceeding more than 5 times WHO limits, followed by low and middle-income cities in Africa and the Western Pacific,” the report states.

In general, “ambient air pollution levels are lowest in high-income countries, particularly in Europe, the Americas and the Western Pacific,” it concludes.

The Lancet editorial shamelessly links lethal air pollution to global warming, without bothering to attempt to establish a real connection between the two.

It then goes on to speak of how the horrible effects of air pollution can be averted by enacting measures to lower carbon dioxide emissions, which, again, is demonstrably false.

The overtly political editorial seeks to persuade a naïve public to enact policy to reduce CO2 emissions by making them think that this will curb deadly air pollution, which it will not.

“Climate change legislation is a central concern across government at all levels, and is not solely about the changing climate, but is embedded in public health policies,” the editors contend.

The Lancet has been a reputable medical journal since its founding in London in 1823. With this unworthy essay, the editors have besmirched the journal’s hard-earned good name by bowing to ideology and political interests.

When propaganda poses as science, everyone loses.

Read more at Breitbart

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024

Comments 8

  1. David Lewis says:
    8 years ago

    It is very common for junk scientists to mix harmless CO2 emissions with truly harmful emission to make a case for climate change action. They will also mix the benefits of natural gas with renewable energy to make the latter look good.

    One thing that helps these junk scientists are places like China. There it is common for both CO2 and harmful emission to be coming out of the same smoke stack.

  2. JayPee says:
    8 years ago

    There will probably be

    8 BILLION DEATHS

    If the
    Greenhouse effect / Global warming / Climate change

    FICTION

    Is ever legally enforced

    There is no need for the UN to exist.

  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    Scientific American,Time,Rolling Stone,National Geographic,Newsweek,Etc nothing but Lies Junk Science and more

  4. JB says:
    8 years ago

    Is this the same Lancet that published a paper linking the triple antigen vaccine to autism?

  5. Sonnyhill says:
    8 years ago

    Lies stacked on top of lies solves nothing. The shortest distance between two points is truth.

  6. Amber says:
    8 years ago

    Seven million deaths should make the scary global warmies positively giddy . Think of the population elimination potential of even more pollution .
    Unfortunately one would not find even I/10 that number on any death certificate .More people are stoned to death in India than die from “pollution ” . Co2 is plant food and not a pollutant . It’s abundance is greening the earth as satellites show .

  7. R Johnson says:
    8 years ago

    Oh how far the mighty have fallen! Lancet prostituted their standing as a premier medical journal to be part of the globalist climate change cabal.

  8. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    More false prophets more false predictions and with the Fake News Network(CNN)and the New York Pravda(Times)leading the way

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • intense wildfireData Shows Georgia Fires Are About Fuel Loads, Not Climate Change
    May 1, 2026
    Real-world wildfire data for Georgia shows no long-term trend toward more frequent or severe fires, despite claims linking recent blazes to climate change. […]
  • coca-cola plastic bottlesFlorida’s Attorney General Takes On The ‘Green’ Plastics Cartel
    May 1, 2026
    Florida AG James Uthmeier escalates from warnings to subpoenas, targeting ESG packaging coordination and climate judicial influence campaigns. […]
  • fossil fuels green energyOil Dependency Unchanged Despite Trillions Spent On Green Energy
    May 1, 2026
    Over 25 years and trillions later, global oil consumption per capita remains unchanged—and the Iran conflict proves alternative energy can't fill the gap. […]
  • busan south koreaSouth Korea Energy Crisis Exposes Net-Zero Fantasy
    Apr 30, 2026
    South Korea scrambles for oil and gas as its net-zero push collides with energy reality, exposing gaps in its climate targets. […]
  • court judge lawyerHouse Judiciary Ramps Up Probe Into Various Climate Groups Improperly Influencing Judges
    Apr 30, 2026
    House Judiciary Committee ramps up investigation of climate activists and attorneys accused of biasing federal judges. […]
  • justice manual gavel‘Scientific Method Is A Myth’: How A UN Climate Activist Rewrote Judges’ Science Manual
    Apr 30, 2026
    Three top physicists tell Chief Justice Roberts that a new chapter in the federal judges' science manual replaces empirical rigor with consensus politics. […]
  • bering strait Arctic mega-damMeteorologist: Damming The Bering Strait Won’t Prevent A ‘Climate Catastrophe’
    Apr 30, 2026
    Damming the strait is a computer-model thought experiment based on speculative scenarios, lacking data and understanding of potential consequences. […]
  • iberian peninsulaOne Year Later, No One Held Accountable For Spain And Portugal’s Massive Blackout
    Apr 29, 2026
    A year after the Iberian Peninsula's worst blackout in recent European history, no one has been held accountable despite multiple investigations. […]
  • aerial co-op cityCo-op City Becomes Ground Zero For New York’s Crazy Climate Costs
    Apr 29, 2026
    Co-op City faces quadrupling maintenance fees as NY's climate laws force costly energy conversions in affordable housing. […]
  • climate scenarios demolishClimate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead
    Apr 29, 2026
    The committee behind IPCC scenarios has officially eliminated RCP8.5 and SSP5-8.5 as implausible — upending decades of climate science. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky