White House announced a series of executive actions this month to create a national charging network for electric vehicles, even as EV owners and reviewers have continued to note short travel ranges, long charging times, and difficulty finding charging stations.
A February 15 White House press release indicated that Tesla Motors will “open a portion of its U.S. Supercharger and Destination Charger network to non-Tesla EVs, making at least 7,500 chargers available for all EVs by the end of 2024,” including at “least 3,500 new and existing 250 kW Superchargers along highway corridors.” [emphasis, links added]
The release also noted Biden’s 2022 infrastructure spending package had allocated $7.5 billion to develop EV charging capabilities.
However, some consumers and industry observers have expressed discontent about the state of EV charging.
Steve Hammes, an automotive critic who has a popular YouTube channel, told ABC News he had concerns about his daughter making trips to and from her college in her Hyundai Kona Electric sport utility vehicle:
“We’re going through the planning process of how easily Maddie can get from Albany to Gettysburg [College] and where she can charge the car,” Hammes told ABC News. “It makes me a little nervous. We want fast chargers that take 30 to 40 minutes — it would not make sense to sit at a Level 2 charger for hours. There isn’t a good software tool that helps EV owners plan their trips.
Tony Quiroga of the publication Car and Driver told ABC News that the difficulty of finding charging stations is exacerbated by the range limitations seen in some EV models.
“Longer trips bring up flaws with EVs. People are leery of taking them on long trips — that’s why older EVs don’t have 40,000 miles on them,” he said.
Another automotive YouTuber, Tyler Hoover, conducted an experiment in September to test Ford’s electric truck mode, the Lightning F-150, on its range and towing power, as Breitbart News noted.
“If a truck towing 3,500 pounds can’t even go 100 miles — that is ridiculously stupid,” Hoover said. “This truck can’t do normal truck things. You would be stopping every hour to recharge, which would take about 45 minutes a pop, and that is absolutely not practical.”
Similarly, a Motor Trend review noted the truck’s “limited towing range” following some performance tests.
The White House said its goal is to nearly quadruple the number of publicly available chargers from 130,000 to 500,000 by the year 2030.
The press release also noted the Department of Transportation will require that all chargers funded by its National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure program maintain 97 percent uptime reliability, a far cry from the current state of EV charging stations, according to some observers.
“The incentive right now is to get stations in the ground,” automotive journalist John Voelcker told ABC News. “It’s not making sure they actually work.”
Read more at Breitbart
Today, EV’s are owned by rich virtue signalling liberals and affluent suburbanites. They may never reach 100% acceptance because of their price and inconvenience. Mandating EV’s will cost the politicians their jobs and their power. I hope that Ford and GM don’t pay the ultimate price for this folly.
There are many issues with electric vehicles. If a family owns one there is one useful niche for many. That is the commute to work. For most commutes an electric vehicle can make the round trip. It can then be charged at home over night assuming the owner lives where that is possible. Shopping also typically has distances within the round trip range of an electric vehicle. For most families, commuting to work and shopping constitute most of the miles they drive. They key is to own a gasoline or diesel car for trips to see Grandma or long other distance driving.
The second gas / diesel vehicle is an expensive crutch. Remember to factor in license and insurance. Another crutch is a standby fossil fueled generator, just in case your electricity provider tries to hijack your EV’s battery. If California’s record as a trend setter holds up, caveat emptor.
Sonnyhill
You are right for many families. It is common to have just one vehicle per family or one per driver. For families like ours the situation is different. We four drivers in this household at the current time and normally have five or six licensed, insured, and running cars. This is partly for recreation, partly to handle our winter driving, and partly to be able haul large objects. For our family, an additional car that was electric would be what we do anyway. However, what we do any way includes spending $6,000 for a car that we drive for 100,000 miles, so electric cars are definitely out.
One issue I seldom see mentioned and that’s how to charge the EV in large cities where many cars are parked on the street. This is not an issue for this in the suburbs where they have garages to park the EV.
We have parking spots reserved for the handicapped. There’ll be parking spots reserved for handicapped vehicles, the ones that need frequent intravenous hook-ups.