• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

DNC Will No Longer Take Money From Fossil Fuel Companies

by Jason Hopkins
June 13, 2018, 12:38 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
8

DNC Head Tom PerezIn an effort to highlight its environmental platform, the Democratic National Committee is no longer accepting campaign contributions from fossil fuel companies.

Executive members of the Democratic National Committee voted to ban all contributions from corporate political action committees related to the oil, gas and coal industries, the Huffington Post first reported Tuesday.

The resolution was originally proposed by Christine Pelosi, a member of the DNC and daughter of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.

“Today we can act — in harmony with the millions of Americans demanding that we clean up our planet and our politics and join the hundreds of individual Democratic political candidates for office across the country who have pledged not to take money from the fossil fuel industry,” Christine Pelosi wrote in a Medium post published on Sunday.

More anti-fossil fuel resolutions might be on the horizon. The DNC is also considering a second resolution to ban contributions over $200 from any individual who works in the fossil fuel sector. Members are expected to vote on the proposal during their Chicago board meeting in August.

“Fossil fuel corporations are drowning our democracy in a tidal wave of dark oily money; they have deceived the public about the impacts of climate change, fought the growth of clean renewable energy, and corrupted our political system,” a portion of the resolution states.

It’s not immediately clear how the new rule will affect the Democratic Party. Fossil fuel companies, having long favored Republican candidates, already do not donate much to Democratic candidates — comparatively speaking.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the DNC received $2.6 million from mining firms and fossil fuel producers during the 2016 election. This figure that pales in comparison to the $56.1 million in contributions the real estate and finance industries gave to Democrats during the same election cycle.

Read more at Daily Caller

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024

Comments 8

  1. Gerry says:
    8 years ago

    The crisis, “man-made global warming” and the solution, “renewable energy”, are both political contrivances. Criminally misleading and meant only to create chaotic disruption on a global scale.

    Electrical energy derived from wind and solar is not the panacea the left seeks. And renewable energy, like “Climate Change” is based solely on lies. After years of promoting deceptive and socially disruptive lies we are yet to observe any of the Left’s purported scientific claims of catastrophic global consequences of global cooling or global warming. The Left’s “science” is the science of lies. “Renewable energy” is not reliable, efficient, and convenient and would amount to nothing more than another government run social program.

    Promotion of substantive electrical energy derived from wind and solar by 2040 or 2050 or anytime in the next century to achieve energy independence is a lie. As we are now beginning to see, the infrastructure required for such and endeavor would require destroying the natural evolutionary moment we have arrived at after millions of years which makes our very existence on this planet possible. Solar panels would replace trees, wind turbines would command the heights and the earth necessarily ravaged to construct the massive electrical infrastructure and storage batteries to support the scheme. Population reduction would be a necessary part of the renewable energy solution as arable land is lost.

    The proposed social and financial costs of the grand deception of “the climate change solution” would result in ecological devastation and a DEAD end for humanity.

  2. David Lewis says:
    8 years ago

    This one of those “sound good” actions. As has already been pointed out, there is no real meaning. The Democrats are really into the “sound good.” Consider the Paris Treaty.

  3. JayPee says:
    8 years ago

    Is anybody that stupid that they believe the DNC claim ?
    Of course they’re going to take the oil and coal money.
    It will be done ” under the radar ” like a pig named O’Bama deemed it !
    The DNC rejecting money no matter what strings attached ?
    The DNC rejecting money no matter what crimes attached ?

    SINCE WHEN !!

    Franklin Roosevelt set the standard in the thirties.
    And it has enlarged exponentially since then.

  4. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    I’m sure their going to get big headlines from the New York Pravda(Times)and Greenpest(Greenpeace)will be patting the Stupid Jackass Party on their backs over this but they will lose the votes of the oil workers

  5. Amber says:
    8 years ago

    Oh yeah I’m sure the coal companies were all just lined up to donate to the
    evil empire DNC and their syco leadership .
    Hillary had to use pay to play to save the DNC’s ass but those days are gone .
    All those fossil fuel suck ups are up in smoke .
    The hard left has taken over a dying political party back by loonie tune billionaire’s
    and eco anarchists .

  6. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    But the Democrats will still take money from the nations #1 Baby Killers Planed Parenthood which was founded by a true racsiists

  7. Russell Johnson says:
    8 years ago

    They are not giving up anything. It’s a sham, why should energy companies donate to the democrats who plan to destroy their business if they gain power?

    • Steve Bunten says:
      8 years ago

      That was my thought too. Virtue signalling, that is all. But they are already sucking big time in getting any donations so why give up any donations they can get. Guess the Democrat Party is the Stupid Party after all.

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • intense wildfireData Shows Georgia Fires Are About Fuel Loads, Not Climate Change
    May 1, 2026
    Real-world wildfire data for Georgia shows no long-term trend toward more frequent or severe fires, despite claims linking recent blazes to climate change. […]
  • coca-cola plastic bottlesFlorida’s Attorney General Takes On The ‘Green’ Plastics Cartel
    May 1, 2026
    Florida AG James Uthmeier escalates from warnings to subpoenas, targeting ESG packaging coordination and climate judicial influence campaigns. […]
  • fossil fuels green energyOil Dependency Unchanged Despite Trillions Spent On Green Energy
    May 1, 2026
    Over 25 years and trillions later, global oil consumption per capita remains unchanged—and the Iran conflict proves alternative energy can't fill the gap. […]
  • busan south koreaSouth Korea Energy Crisis Exposes Net-Zero Fantasy
    Apr 30, 2026
    South Korea scrambles for oil and gas as its net-zero push collides with energy reality, exposing gaps in its climate targets. […]
  • court judge lawyerHouse Judiciary Ramps Up Probe Into Various Climate Groups Improperly Influencing Judges
    Apr 30, 2026
    House Judiciary Committee ramps up investigation of climate activists and attorneys accused of biasing federal judges. […]
  • justice manual gavel‘Scientific Method Is A Myth’: How A UN Climate Activist Rewrote Judges’ Science Manual
    Apr 30, 2026
    Three top physicists tell Chief Justice Roberts that a new chapter in the federal judges' science manual replaces empirical rigor with consensus politics. […]
  • bering strait Arctic mega-damMeteorologist: Damming The Bering Strait Won’t Prevent A ‘Climate Catastrophe’
    Apr 30, 2026
    Damming the strait is a computer-model thought experiment based on speculative scenarios, lacking data and understanding of potential consequences. […]
  • iberian peninsulaOne Year Later, No One Held Accountable For Spain And Portugal’s Massive Blackout
    Apr 29, 2026
    A year after the Iberian Peninsula's worst blackout in recent European history, no one has been held accountable despite multiple investigations. […]
  • aerial co-op cityCo-op City Becomes Ground Zero For New York’s Crazy Climate Costs
    Apr 29, 2026
    Co-op City faces quadrupling maintenance fees as NY's climate laws force costly energy conversions in affordable housing. […]
  • climate scenarios demolishClimate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead
    Apr 29, 2026
    The committee behind IPCC scenarios has officially eliminated RCP8.5 and SSP5-8.5 as implausible — upending decades of climate science. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky