It’s got to be one of the most awkward silences the Senate has ever seen.
For 10 excruciatingly long seconds yesterday, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) boffins couldn’t answer a simple question from Queensland Senator Matt Canavan.
It all started when, in an attempt to push the “bushfires are caused by climate change” narrative, Labor senators got the CSIRO’s bushfires explainer document tabled in parliament.
They weren’t counting on the fleet-footed Canavan actually reading the explainer and catching the CSIRO out red-handed:
“When I read through it I noticed that the CSIRO had failed to include some key information,” said the savvy senator.
Canavan quoted the CSIRO’s official published position on climate change and bushfires: ‘However, no studies explicitly attributing the Australian increase in fire weather to climate change have been performed at this time.’
“Why wasn’t that sentence included in the explainer?” Canavan asked Doctor Peter Mayfield who was fronting Senate Estimates on behalf of the CSIRO.
“…it is really a question of what you choose to put in and not put in. There’s a lot of other things we could have written,” poor Mayfield bumbled.
Canavan replied: “This is apparently the latest version of ‘Climate Change in Australia’. Is that still the [CSIRO’s] position – that there are no studies attributing the Australian increase in fire weather to climate change?”
<insert said 10 excruciatingly long seconds here>
Mayfield silently stared down at his notes, searching in vain for a shovel.
“I can have a crack at that if you want, Peter,” a CSIRO colleague’s voice is heard over the microphone.
But Mayfield soldiered on: “I was just having a quick check on it, yes. At this stage, there are historical studies around that but at this stage, we haven’t done any specific work.”
To be clear, this was the Australian federal government agency responsible for scientific research caught red-handed trying to pin the bushfires on climate change despite its own official position being that there are no studies to prove this.
Speaking later in the evening, Canavan said:
“This was a document about climate change and the science about bushfires and they failed to include that the CSIRO has concluded in their last report on climate change in Australia that there are no studies linking climate change to fire weather at this stage.
“It’s like writing a report for a newspaper about a football match and not including the final score.
“It was essential to what they were trying to write and they left it out.”
Clearly this wasn’t a mistake by the CSIRO.
It was a deliberate attempt to fan the flames of the climate cult.
And of course, as solid members of said cult, the mainstream media hasn’t uttered a word about the exchange in Senate Estimates yesterday.
Information is being censored. Only one story gets up these days: Australia is burning and it’s all climate change’s/the government’s fault.
Read more at Advance Australia
One of the most significant parts of this article is that with no thought CSIRO automatically blamed the fires on climate change. This is because they are so determined to advance their political agendas that are hitch hiking on this movement.
Defund the cretins. Let them go out to work like everyone else.
Really what they presented and tried to deceive with was science fiction .
They wanted to promote a lie they knew was a lie .
Simply put they intended to trick lawmakers .
Fire these maggots .
CO2 as a consequence of using coal to generate electricity is yet another example of mass hysteria. History is full of such examples. I wouldn’t mind betting that in 50 to 100 years time the world will be more worried about global cooling, a far more likely possibility in my view. The warming hypophysis is based entirely on computer modelling. I call it playstation science.
I would agree with you about the cooling that seems to be in the near future. Many scientists studying the sun, which the IPCC ignores, have suggested that we are about to enter a cooling period of about 40 years, possibly longer where the planet’s temperature will decrease about 0.5 degrees. It is impossible to estimate the amount of cooling but many think that it will be something close to the Dalton minimum.
Faking the data fudging around with the equipment tampering with the information they should be made to account for their cheating
I find its al about the money and creating a job where no job is warranted…al based on anecdotal observations nog historical facts. I do not the change in whether never mind climate change but I have lived longer than most posting their opinion but my earth science background and studies suggest it is man that must adjust to natural climate changes and taxing activities that has only a 1% effect on climate is ridiculous … some of these people need a ride to outer space or be left in the middle of the Pacific Ocean for a week to realize man is having negligible effect on climate …