Climate envoy John Kerry asserted yesterday the commodity is a “bridge fuel” that can help nations on their path to net-zero emissions — a notion rejected by many climate hawks, and one that’s motivating some EU member states to threaten suit against the European Commission for proposing to treat gas as such.
“Gas can be helpful in this transition,” Kerry said at a U.S. Chamber of Commerce event previewing next year’s COP27 climate change conference. “Gas is going to be important to the transition.”
The “bridge fuel” designation has the ring of an endorsement, but Kerry issued some major qualifications.
“But if we move too fast and too far with too much, and build out an infrastructure for 30 and 40 years, with plans to be able to use it for 30 or 40 years without abatement — if it’s abated, terrific.
“If you can capture 100% and it makes it affordable, that’s wonderful. But we’re not doing that,” he said, also bringing up the consequences of methane leaks.
Looking back to COP26, it’s important to remember participating governments resolved to at least phase down coal, which will have to be replaced with something.
The pro-gas Germans told the European Commission last week gas enables “rapid phase-out of coal” and to thus “achieve CO2 savings in the short term.”
The Germans also used “bridge” to positively describe the fuel and lobby the Commission to reduce restrictions on fossil gas in its proposed sustainable finance taxonomy (which, as we mentioned yesterday, Austria and Luxembourg oppose altogether for giving gas any chance at being considered green).
Kerry, who also emphasized the need to get rid of coal yesterday, seems to be in some broad agreement with Germany there.
It’s the latest refinement of the administration’s stance on natural gas from Kerry: Kerry last year, as the administration struggled to articulate a clear position on gas, said that it is not “anything near a long-term solution.”
The politics have shifted somewhat since and become even more volatile, with environmentalists voicing displeasure over President Joe Biden’s perceived lack of achievements on the fossil fuel front in his first year.
The counterbalance has been political pressure on Biden to find a way to lower fuel prices, as well as, more recently, the pressure to try to counter Russia’s influence over Europe.
Kevin Book, managing director of ClearView Energy Partners, said the administration is “toeing a narrow line” on the issue of gas, accounting for the especially high, gas-driven prices in Europe and the geopolitics associated with the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
Book mentioned Biden’s comments last week suggesting the U.S. could help Europe by supplying it with more gas.
“Climate risk now appears to be competing with conventional energy security risk for administration bandwidth,” he told Jeremy.
Read rest at Examiner
Is a “bridge fuel” one that saves lives and prevents people freezing?
So when will Kerry give us all his Air Conditions when will he open up his Gates to his private Estate and take in all those Illegal Aliens/Future Democrat Voters?
Even someone like Kerry who is out of touch with reality can occasionally have some enlightenment. When fossil fuels are burnt the hydrogen atom provides more energy than the carbon atom. At a ratio of 4 to 1, natural gas has the highest percentage of hydrogen than any other fossil fuel. That translates to the most energy per unit of carbon dioxide emitted. However, the bridge Kerry is referring leads to a long fall down the canyon. Unless it is nuclear, renewable energy will never be able to power a modern industrial society.
Whenever John K speaks, the phrase “dumb as a bag of hammers” comes to mind.
Or, a donut hole seeking a donut.
John Kerry is part of the globalist cabal seeking to control everyone through world government. Climate change is only one mechanism seeking to convince us that
It’s our fault and all our activities must submit to “government” control. Democracy and capitalism stand in the way of global governance. Our constitution, laws and rights have protected us to a large degree but with increasing frequency policies are justified as being “for the good of the people “. I have a strong feeling that most of the people we elect on a national basis are trying to figure a way to ride the tiger promoting themselves and trying to get richer and more powerful. Kerry and other Globalists are ready to throw America under the bus while at the same time giving China and Russia a pass.