• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Climate Change Or Booming Growth? The Blame Game Heats Up With Disaster Losses

Examining Disaster losses In 2024

by Roger Pielke Jr.
January 13, 2025, 8:20 AM
in Extreme Weather, News and Opinion, Science
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0

extreme weather
In 2024, the world experienced $298 billion in catastrophe losses related to weather events, according to Munich Re, which just released its annual tabulation.1

Munich Re attributes the losses to — what else — climate change, dramatically announcing that “climate change is showing its claws” and “climate change is taking its gloves off.” [emphasis, links added]

The Munich Re attribution claim contrasts starkly with how its largest competitor, Swiss Re, characterizes 2024 loss totals, identifying economic development as the “main driver” of increasing loss totals:

“Economic development continues to be the main driver of the rise in insured losses resulting from floods, but also other perils, seen over many decades. However, with natural catastrophe risks rising and higher price levels, the annual increase of 5–7% in insured losses will continue, and protection gaps could remain high. This highlights the need for adaptation in combination with an adequate insurance coverage that can support financial resilience.”

To better understand global disaster losses, it is helpful to place them into the context of the global economy, which like the climate, also changes over time.

The methodology and data are described in detail in this 2019 paper:

Pielke, Jr. R. (2019). Tracking progress on the economic costs of disasters under the indicators of the sustainable development goals. Environmental Hazards, 18(1), 1-6.

The figure below updates the time series of Munich Re’s disaster loss record as a proportion of global GDP.

Sources: Munich Re, World Bank, and updated from Pielke 2019.

Losses in 2024 were about 0.26% of global GDP, similar to 2021 and 2022, much lower than 2005 and 2017, and higher than 2018, 2019, and 2023.

Since 1990, the overall trend has been down — from about 0.25% of GDP in 1990 to about 0.20% in 2024. In the 1990s catastrophe losses as a proportion of GDP exceeding those of 2024 were common.

The data in this graph is good news — regarding economic losses, extreme weather has less impact today than it did 35 years ago.

Last fall, Verisk published an estimate of expected global insured losses (specifically, AAL or average annual loss) of $151 billion.

If we double that, as is common practice to estimate overall (insured and uninsured) losses, we get $302 billion, which is almost exactly the actual loss total for 2024.

Losses in 2024, at about $300 billion, were large — but not at all unexpected or unusual.

Verisk’s 2023 average annual loss estimate was $133 billion — meaning that expected insured losses jumped by $18 billion in just one year, from 2023 to 2024.

Bill Churney, President of Verisk’s extreme event solutions, attributes this alarming surge in catastrophe losses to several key factors.

The primary drivers include the growth in exposure values, fueled by ongoing construction in high-hazard areas, and rising replacement costs due to inflation.

While climate change is often cited as a factor, Churney emphasizes that year-over-year increases in exposure and replacement values exert a more immediate impact.

Verisk expects continued exposure growth of 7.2% per year, which means insured losses will continue to mount. Verisk explains:

“While actual annual insured losses over the past five years have been high, averaging $106 billion, they should not be seen as outliers.

“Our models show the insurance industry should be prepared to experience total annual insured losses from natural catastrophes of $151 billion on average, and well more than that in large loss years.”

That exposure growth is driving increasing disaster losses is not at all surprising.

The figure below shows that over the past decade, expected insured catastrophe losses have more than doubled (from ~$70B in 2014 to ~$151 in 2024).

Source: AIR 2021 (now Verisk).

While some promote climate change as the main factor behind increasing losses, Swiss Re acknowledges that it has not yet seen a signal of climate change in losses, even as climate change presents future risks:

“To date, growth in natural catastrophe-related property losses has been mostly driven by rising exposures due to economic growth, accumulation of asset values, urbanisation and rising populations, often in regions susceptible to severe weather events (eg, coastal regions, river fronts and wildland-urban interfaces).

“In the future, hazard intensification due to climate change is set to add to weather-related losses.”

Read rest at The Honest Broker

The Honest Broker is written by climate expert Roger Pielke Jr and is reader-supported. If you value what you have read here, please consider subscribing and supporting the work that goes into it.

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
News

Scientific Bombshell Undermines The Climate Doom Narrative

Oct 23, 2024
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • newsom blame oil companies firesCalif. Dems Move To Extract Billions From Oil Companies For Wildfire Damages
    May 6, 2026
    California Dems target oil companies with billions in wildfire liability while state regulations strangle energy production and forest management. […]
  • typhoon aftermathClimate Models Predicted More Intense Typhoons. Satellite Data Shows The Opposite.
    May 6, 2026
    Satellite data from 1980-2023 shows western North Pacific cyclones declining in frequency and intensity, contradicting climate model predictions. […]
  • calif bullet train to nowhereCalifornia’s Bullet Train: From $30 Billion Promise To $250 Billion Boondoggle
    May 5, 2026
    California's high-speed rail has ballooned from $30 billion to $250 billion; lawmakers now call the project illegal and want it scrapped entirely. […]
  • ellison climate lawsuit presserDOJ Sues Minnesota Over State Climate Lawsuit Targeting Energy Companies
    May 5, 2026
    The U.S. Department of Justice is taking legal action against Minnesota, challenging the state’s climate lawsuit against prominent energy companies. […]
  • grapes vineyard wineData Debunks Claims That Climate Change Is Killing California Cabernet
    May 5, 2026
    Cabernet production is rising in California, undercutting claims by the San Francisco Chronicle that climate change is harming the crop. […]
  • uk net zero docsEd Miliband Fights Releasing Document Showing Net Zero Will Raise Bills, Benefit Wind Giants
    May 5, 2026
    Ed Miliband accused of covering up document showing his net zero plan will raise household electricity bills while protecting wind farm profits. […]
  • green grift dem donorsExposing The Great Green Grift
    May 5, 2026
    Lee Zeldin testifies how billions in tax dollars became a slush fund for Obama-Biden officials, Democratic donors, and the Green New Scam. […]
  • day after tomorrow londonMeteorologist: USA Today’s Latest Climate Scare Relies On Debunked Movie Science
    May 4, 2026
    USA Today falsely claims AMOC could rapidly collapse, relying on speculative modeling and cinematic fear imagery. […]
  • kings mountain mine conceptUSGS Announces Massive Lithium Deposits In Appalachian Region
    May 4, 2026
    USGS identifies 2.3 million metric tons of lithium in Appalachian region as North Carolina mine advances toward production to reduce China dependence. […]
  • porsche seinfeld lenoJerry Seinfeld Bashes Electric Cars As ‘Stupid Virtue Signal,’ Has Zero Interest
    May 4, 2026
    Jerry Seinfeld slams electric cars as a "stupid virtue signal" and says he has zero interest in EVs, questioning their environmental claims. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky