• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

China Isn’t Even Close To Meeting Paris Climate Accord Goals

by Tim Pearce
October 16, 2017, 2:31 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
5

China’s goal to run on 15 percent non-fossil fuel based energy by 2020 is not enough for the world leader in greenhouse gas production to meet standards agreed to in the 2015 Paris Climate Accords, Reuters reports.

China needs to overhaul its energy mix evolution and aim to produce 26 percent of its energy from renewables and nuclear plants by 2020 to comply with the Paris pact, according to a joint study by China National Renewable Energy Centre (CNREC) and the Energy Research Institute of Academy of Macroeconomic Research.

“To ensure compliance with the Paris agreement, strong support to renewable energy deployment is needed on both the national and local levels,” CNREC deputy director general Wang Zhongying told Reuters.

The transition is tough, however, due to the country’s strong dependence on coal.

If China is able to revamp its transition from fossil fuel based energy to greener options, the possibility of the Earth warming two degrees Celsius remains likely.

A July study found that the chances of keeping warming under 2 degrees by meeting Paris Agreement objectives are only 5 percent, The Guardian reported at the time.

“I agree that staying below 2C and 1.5C are unlikely and very, very unlikely, respectively,” Texas A&M University climate scientist Andrew Dessler, who did not take part in the study, told The Guardian. “But this research gives a false sense of rigor. Tomorrow someone could invent a carbon-free energy source that everyone adopts.”

“More aggressive policies are urgently needed, but this study should not be taken as evidence that nothing can be done,” MIT Sloan Sustainability Initiative’s John Sterman said at the time.

Read more at Daily Caller

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026

Comments 5

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    9 years ago

    The Paris Accord is based upon Junk Science and politics nothing realy sceintific about and fake scientists like Bill Nye

  2. Amber says:
    9 years ago

    As long as China keeps vacuuming up manufacturing and has a relatively stable population only a fool would think they are
    going to put emission reductions ahead of economic self interest .
    The real bounce to western economies will be from the laundered Chinese money driving up real estate as the rich park their cash
    squeaky clean into tax free properties . Governments have turned a blind eye while their palms are thoroughly greased .
    Hockey bags of cash going into casino’s to get washed and not a peep from anyone . What ever happened to the principle of a balanced immigration policy ?

  3. David Lewis says:
    9 years ago

    No matter what side of this issue someone is on, if they have done a good job of following it, it is very obvious that China never would meet its obligations under the Paris Treaty. It is also quite obvious that they never planned to do so.

    I don’t know what calendar the author is using, but mine says that 2020 is two years and two months away. That is enough time to plan a nuclear plant but not build one. It is very little time to build massive renewable capability.

    The article was obviously written by a warmist who has bought into the AGW fraud. He quotes others who say there is very chance of keeping warming under two degrees by 2100. This web site has told of models more reliable than those used by the IPCC that predict the do nothing approach will keep us under two degrees.

  4. Spurwing Plover says:
    9 years ago

    Some liberal written text books or enviromental themed books aimed at kids were telling them how China is a example for america becuase their farmers use foot pumps and they travel mostly by bicycle this it the truth the liberal idiots wont tel you the dragons the biggist poluter

    • David Lewis says:
      9 years ago

      I suspect these liberal idiots are so poorly informed that they don’t know the truth themselves.

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • trump presserTrump’s EPA Scraps Biden-Era Rules Targeting Commercial Refrigerants
    May 22, 2026
    Trump's EPA is scrapping Biden-era refrigerant rules, promising to save Americans $2.4 billion and lower grocery store prices. […]
  • shell gas stationShell Goes To The Netherlands’ Highest Court Over Its Emissions Fate
    May 22, 2026
    Shell heads to the Netherlands' Supreme Court in an emissions case that could redefine corporate climate liability for oil companies worldwide. […]
  • Graham Platner’s China Policy Is Not Just Naive — It’s Dangerous
    May 21, 2026
    Graham Platner thinks cooperating with China is a climate strategy; it's really a blueprint for surrendering America's energy future to Beijing. […]
  • green new dealClimate Change Apocalypticism Was A Fashion, Not A Cause
    May 21, 2026
    For nearly 20 years, progressives preached climate apocalypse. Now Democrats are quietly ditching the Green New Deal as voters demand affordable energy. […]
  • Electric Car chargingAs Federal Subsidies Dry Up, EV Sales Collapse Despite Soaring Gas Prices
    May 21, 2026
    EV sales dropped 23% year-over-year in April even as gas prices spiked. The real culprit? Federal subsidies ended in September, and the market collapsed. […]
  • Indonesia coal bargeSoutheast Asia Ramps Up Fossil Fuels, Backs Away From Net Zero Pledges
    May 20, 2026
    After the Iranian conflict disrupted LNG supplies, Southeast Asian governments expanded coal capacity and shelved net-zero commitments. […]
  • town hall meeting votersDems Abandon Climate Messaging After Polling Shows Voters Don’t Care
    May 20, 2026
    Democrats are abandoning climate messaging after polling shows voters rank it below affordability and other priorities, leaving Bill McKibben frustrated. […]
  • cruz hagemanGOP Moves To ‘Stop Climate Shakedowns,’ Block Dem-Led Anti-Energy Lawsuits
    May 20, 2026
    GOP lawmakers introduce federal legislation to shield oil companies from state climate lawsuits and billion-dollar penalty schemes. […]
  • climate doom headlinesAfter Beloved Climate Doomsday Scenario Gets Tossed, Media Go Silent
    May 20, 2026
    The IPCC discarded RCP 8.5, the climate model behind years of doomsday headlines, and outlets that cited it extensively have gone eerily silent. […]
  • empty courtroomClimate Superfund Bills Suffer Sweeping Defeats Across Country
    May 19, 2026
    Despite coordinated activism, climate superfund bills failed or stalled in 12 states as lawmakers cited liability risks and consumer harm. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky