Climate advocates are devastated that President Trump has pulled the budget of a project aimed at monitoring international compliance with Paris Agreement Pledges.
The Trump Administration Just Jeopardized The World’s Ability to Measure Carbon Emissions
You know, the stuff that’s causing climate change.
CARLY CASSELLA, SCIENCE AS FACT
10 MAY 2018
Apparently, withdrawing from the Paris climate accord wasn’t enough. Now, the Trump administration wants to restrict the world’s ability to measure carbon emissions.
According to a new report from the journal Science, the Trump administration has quietly killed NASA’s Carbon Monitoring System (CMS) – a $10 million-a-year research project, which monitors the flow of Earth’s carbon.
The move jeopardizes plans to verify the national emission cuts agreed to in the Paris climate accords, argues Kelly Sims Gallagher, director of Tufts University’s Center for International Environment and Resource Policy.
“If you cannot measure emissions reductions, you cannot be confident that countries are adhering to the agreement,” Gallagher told Science.
…
This doesn’t mean that all carbon monitoring and measuring is gone. It just means that leadership in this area will most likely be passed on to Europe, which has one carbon-monitoring satellite of its own, and more on the way.
“We really shoot ourselves in the foot if we let other people develop the technology,” said Duffy.
…
I don’t see why USA dropping funding for a programme which duplicates European efforts will reduce the world’s carbon monitoring capability, or cause any harm to US interests.
The $10 million per year saving might only be a drop in the government budget, but one drop at a time eventually adds up to serious savings.
Read more at Watts Up With That
You silly goose, Kelly. 90% of all countries have not adhered to the Paris accord since day one of the signing. They can’t AFFORD to comply without destroying their economies. You just don’t understand people’s NEEDS.
I’m absolutely disgusted by anyone who confuses carbon dioxide with Carbon (as in “carbon footprint”). CO2 is made up of one part carbon and two parts oxygen. If you’re going to call it something, wouldn’t it make more sense to call it an “oxygen footprint”? Sounds stupid, doesn’t it — although not quite as stupid as “carbon” footprint”. The reason for this “carbon” sounds bad (Ooh, yech. That black dirty stuff) and oxygen is good — (it’s what we need to live on. Using the logic of the global warming fraud proponents, salt is sodium chloride. Shouldn’t we warn people of a sodium (a poison) footprint?
Stop it John! You are making too much sense for the Libtards to understand!
Too much Common Sense makes liberals heads explode logic gives them migraine headaches intelligence makes them melt like with Dorthy and the Wicked Witch