climate change dispatch logo climate change dispatch logo small

12 State Attorneys General Sue Biden Admin Over Its Climate Policies

bidenA group of Republican state attorneys general alleged in a federal lawsuit filed Monday that President Joe Biden’s climate policies are a major overreach and could damage their states’ economies.

The 12-state coalition said Biden overstepped his constitutional authority by declaring there were “social costs” of continued greenhouse gas emissions in a Jan. 20 executive order.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District Court of Missouri, argued that assigning such costs is a “quintessentially legislative action” that falls within Congress’ authority.

“The Biden Administration’s calculation of ‘social costs’ would justify imposing trillions of dollars in regulatory costs on the American economy every year to offset these supposed costs,” the lawsuit said.

Biden’s executive action determined that there was a “social cost” of continued carbon, nitrous oxide, and methane emissions.

“Social cost” refers to the estimated dollar value incurred by the U.S. for every additional metric ton of carbon emitted into the environment, according to the Government Accountability Office.

The lawsuit said Biden’s executive order enables regulatory agencies to place restrictions on nearly every aspect of Americans’ lives in order to cut back on greenhouse gas emissions.

Potential regulations could affect cars, refrigerators, homes, food purchases, and electric bills.

“Manufacturing, agriculture, and energy production are essential to Missouri’s economy and employ thousands of hard-working Missourians across the state,” Missouri Attorney General Schmitt, who led the coalition, said in a statement Monday.

“Under President Biden’s executive order, which he didn’t have the authority to enact, these hard-working Missourians who have lived and worked this land for generations could be left in the dust,” he continued.

In addition to the order being an overstep of Biden’s authority, Monday’s lawsuit argued it would lead to severe economic devastation.

Biden’s order targets reliable and affordable energy production that lifts millions out of poverty, creates jobs, enables innovation, and promotes U.S. energy independence, the lawsuit said.

“It will destroy jobs, stifle energy production, strangle America’s energy independence, suppress agriculture, deter innovation, and impoverish working families,” the lawsuit stated. “It undermines the sovereignty of the States and tears at the fabric of liberty.”

The states of Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Utah joined Missouri as plaintiffs.

Biden, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm, and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack were all listed among the defendants in the lawsuit.

“From higher energy bills to lost jobs, this massive expansion of federal regulatory power has the potential to impact nearly every household in this state – that’s why today I’m leading a coalition of states to put a stop to this executive order and protect Missouri families,” Schmitt said.

Read rest at Daily Caller

Comments (4)

  • Avatar

    Spurwing Plover

    |

    Biden like all the rest of the Liberal Democ-Rats is a Globalists him and his ilk are all for erasing our borders and creating the North American(Soviet)Union why els dose Biden the Stupid halting the construction of the Border Fence and i hope this Lawsuit is good enough to make Biden abide by the U.S. Constitution which Obama the Worst ignred all those eight long years

  • Avatar

    David Lewis

    |

    Biden’s executive orders on climate change is definitely an over reach. What he is attempting to do is practice the same type of power Hitler had where he could make laws without any other government entity concurrence. Often times the excuse for such action is they can’t get measures in the executive orders through Congress. The reason they can’t get them through Congress is they shouldn’t be passed.

    When Biden refers to the social cost of green house emission he is almost certainly referring to the US Climate Assessment. This assessment was based on climate model RCP 8.5. This model is so extreme that many environmental activists don’t believe it. It assumes a five fold increase in burning coal as well as other unlikely scenarios.

    Of course even if there was such an increase in burning coal it wouldn’t impact the climate because carbon dioxide is not the controlling parameter.

Comments are closed

Share via