• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

The Hill Defends Months Of Biden Promising To Ban Fracking

by Joseph Vazquez
4 years ago
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
5

bidenDemocratic Presidential nominee Joe Biden just contradicted himself by claiming he was “not banning fracking.”

Liberal outlet The Hill not only defended it but accused President Donald Trump of falsely stating Biden’s position.

Biden pretended Monday in Pennsylvania: “I am not banning fracking. Let me say that again: I am not banning fracking. No matter how many times Donald Trump lies about me.”

The Hill parroted this, and crazily said that “Throughout the Republican National Convention last week, speakers attacked Biden’s climate and energy plan, offering a number of misleading comments.”

At the bottom of the piece, The Hill said that Trump “falsely stated” during the Republican National Convention that “‘Biden has promised to abolish the production of American oil, coal, shale and natural gas.’”

Watch Biden’s comments below from Pennsylvania:

Biden discusses his energy plan: “I am not banning fracking. Let me say that again: I am not banning fracking. No matter how many times Donald Trump lies about me.” https://t.co/LBywpukq9G pic.twitter.com/B5QXkBoQbt

— CBS News (@CBSNews) August 31, 2020

The Hill brazenly argued: “Biden’s climate plan calls for ending new oil and gas leases on public lands, but it would not ban oil drilling and does not bar any specific method for extracting fossil fuels.”

The article completely ignored mentioning Biden’s own comments to CNN’s Dana Bash during the second Democratic presidential debate last year, where Biden said he would make sure both fracking and fossil fuels would be “eliminated:”

BASH: Just to clarify. Would there be any place for fossil fuels, including coal and fracking, in a Biden administration?”

BIDEN: No. We would work it out. We would make sure it’s eliminated and no more subsidies for either one of those. Either — any fossil fuel.

During the March 15, 2020, Democratic presidential debate, Biden said of fracking: “No more — no new fracking.”

The Washington Post headlined its video grab: “Biden indicates from the debate stage that he would ban all fracking.” [Emphasis added.]

Grabien News founder Tom Elliot cut a video of Biden saying at a New Hampshire event in February: “We are going to get rid of fossil fuels.”

In January, Joe Biden said in a video that he would end fracking in an exchange with a New Hampshire voter.

PROSPECTIVE VOTER: But like, what about, say, stopping fracking?”

PROSPECTIVE VOTER: And stopping …

BIDEN: Yes.

PROSPECTIVE VOTER: … pipeline infrastructure?

BIDEN: Yes.

The Hill initially didn’t mention any of this. It instead said that “Biden’s climate plan calls for ending new oil and gas leases on public lands, but it would not ban oil drilling and does not bar any specific method for extracting fossil fuels.” [Emphasis added.]

The article was later stealth-edited to include a brief note on Biden’s comments during the March 15 debate: “[Biden] caused confusion during the March Democratic debate by saying he would not support ‘new fracking.'”

No editor’s note was included in the addition.

SUPERCUT: Biden promises “no more” fracking if he’s elected President. pic.twitter.com/iWcsU2Yam8

— Abigail Marone (@abigailmarone) August 31, 2020

The Hill also attempted to isolate Biden’s energy plan away from his former Democratic challengers as being less radical:

Biden’s climate plan wasn’t as bold as some of his earlier Democratic challengers, but it is still the most ambitious climate plan ever put forth by a presidential nominee.

Contact The Hill Editorial department at editor@thehill.com and demand they correct the record on Biden’s past support for banning fracking.

Read more at Newsbusters

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Truth
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Del
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki iconOdnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • Yummly
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related

Next Post

Like Biden, Kamala Harris Has Endorsed A Complete Fracking Ban

Comments 5

  1. Pingback: The Hill Defends Months Of Biden Promising To Ban Fracking | altnews.org
  2. MCPR says:
    4 years ago

    “Who you gonna believe… ?”

  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    The career liberal politician still the usial and liberal as well as being more crooked then a bolt of lightning

  4. Don Hart says:
    4 years ago

    This dastardly and insane fabrication is enough to forfeit all First Amendment rights for The Hill, it’s publisher, editors and any left wing loopy writer working there after
    publication of this liberal garbage.

  5. Randy Verret says:
    4 years ago

    You forgot his other comment during the debates that “Oil Company executives belong in jail’…

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • bidenBiden’s Net Zero Plans Have Sent Prices Soaring. It’s Going To Get Worse
    Jul 8, 2024
    Biden’s betting big on his 'net zero' agenda as part of his misguided ideological climate-control vision, even as Americans get walloped. […]
  • biden evElectric Vehicle Adoption Stalls Out As Americans Snub The Pricey Cars
    Jul 8, 2024
    The road to widespread EV adoption is proving to be bumpy, with several obstacles threatening to stall progress. […]
  • severe weatherThe Media’s Relentless Climate-Fueled Extreme-Weather Nonsense—Part 2
    Jul 8, 2024
    A seemingly plausible-sounding storyline for any extreme weather event is easy to create. But a storyline is a story, not science. […]
  • Pacific hurricaneUnseen Calm In The North Pacific: Historic Storm-Free Period Since June 1
    Jul 8, 2024
    The lack of named storms in the North Pacific since June 1, 2024, marks a significant meteorological event being ignored by the MSM. […]
  • newsom debate june 24Newsom Jets To DC To ‘Stand With’ Biden Amid Wildfire Emergency, Foregoes Virtual Meeting
    Jul 5, 2024
    After declaring a state of emergency over statewide wildfires, Newsom jetted to DC instead of meeting virtually as other governors did. […]
  • ev charging expoThe 500,000 Nationwide EV Charger Network Is A $7.5 Billion Charade
    Jul 5, 2024
    The 500,000 charging stations will cost the government $400 billion, not the $7.5 billion the President has promised. […]
  • wheat harvestIgnore The Climate Crisis Hype: Humanity Is Thriving Thanks To Fossil Fuels
    Jul 5, 2024
    Climate crisis? Thanks to fossil fuels, very few times in history have seen such rapid progress as the period from the mid-20th century to now. […]
  • electric car charging stationEnergy, Business Groups Urge Supreme Court To Halt California’s EV Mandate For All Americans
    Jul 5, 2024
    Numerous trade groups are asking the Supremes to review a lower court’s decision that allows California to push electric vehicles on the entire U.S. […]
  • Keir Starmer rallyAs Brits Struggle With Net Zero Costs, Labour Plans To Accelerate Unpopular Green Schemes
    Jul 3, 2024
    Fast-tracking Net Zero will hike energy bills, smother the economy, and spark an almighty backlash. And Labour is promising just that. […]
  • city underwaterMeteorologist Exposes How Media Is Hyping NOAA’s ‘Computer-Modeled’ Sea Level Scare
    Jul 3, 2024
    Hyperbolic predictions on New York City and sea level rise have been around for decades, and not one has come true or shown they will. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Portions © 2024 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Climate Change Dispatch