• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

The ‘Build Back Better’ Bill Is Just Another ‘Gimmicky Shell Game’

by Scott Ruesterholz
3 years ago
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
2

manchin sinemaOn Friday, the House of Representatives passed their mammoth “Build Back Better” reconciliation bill, which is so dependent on creative accounting that even Enron’s accountants would have blushed.

Back on November 1, Senator Joe Manchin warned that the proposal relied on “shell games” and “gimmicks.” Boy, was he right.

Rather than heed Manchin’s warning, it seems like Speaker Nancy Pelosi took that warning as a challenge to stretch the rules of logic even further.

If Senator Manchin is serious about passing a bill that is paid for, he should block the bill, and conservatives should point out these tricks so voters realize this bill breaks President Joe Biden’s pledge that his agenda won’t “cost a dime.”

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found the bill as written would cost $367 billion over a decade, but its true cost is substantially more because Democrats are using permanent tax increases to finance temporary spending programs.

What Democrats are doing is analogous to someone having a $24,000 budget for rent who instead of renting a place for $2,000 a month, splurges for the $3,000 place, runs out of money after 8 months, and ends up homeless for the holidays.

For instance, the bill will spend $253 billion in 2025 but just $88 billion in 2031 because it would phase out programs like universal pre-K, which would cost $27 billion in 2027 but nothing in 2031.

In reality, Democrats are betting once they create a new program, future Congresses will be compelled to extend them.

We can already imagine the mainstream media headlines that allowing a temporary program to expire amounts to a “heartless budget cut” by mean-spirited Republicans.

I mean, when has a temporary government program actually ended? These should be assumed permanent until proven otherwise. …snip…

If Democrats really think these programs are so great, they should admit the true cost rather than trying to obfuscate it behind budgetary smoke and mirrors.

Or if Senators like Manchin recognize that further large-scale deficit spending is unwise due to elevated inflation, they should say no and stop this bill in its track.

And to be clear, while we can debate how much of the current inflation is transitory, this bill is inflationary over the short term.

It adds $150+ billion to the deficit each of the next four years, putting more money into the economy and pushing up aggregate demand.

At the same time, one of the bill’s main ‘pay-fors’ is higher taxes on corporations. Given strong demand, companies have significant pricing power, and rather than pay higher taxes out of existing profits, they will raise the prices that you and I pay to cover this increase in their cost structure.

Amazon won’t really pay more; their customers will pay their higher bills for them.

Raising aggregate demand while increasing the cost of aggregate supply is a recipe to keep inflation higher than it otherwise would be. That is the last thing that our economy needs.

If this bill passes and high inflation taxes Americans next year, Biden and congressional Democrats would “own” it and deserve to be roundly punished in the midterms.

Amazingly over the next four years, Democrats spend over $200 billion increasing the State and Local Tax (SALT) credit deduction—with the vast majority of that money benefiting those who make over $250k.

Democrats said they wanted to raise taxes on the rich; instead, many in blue states will be getting a cut in the next couple of years under this bill. The rich get a tax cut, and you got higher gas prices.

In reality, this bill subsidizes inefficiencies and excesses of state and local governments. If high tax states provided better services to their residents than low-tax ones, residents wouldn’t be moving out.

Instead, many have worse infrastructure and schools. That’s why thousands, like me, have left states like New York for Florida and elsewhere.

This bill is an assault on logic and honesty; in practice it will cost over $3.5 trillion and add $2 trillion to the debt, transforming America’s social safety net while adding to the inflationary impulse the next few years.

For the sake of the country, it cannot pass; moderates like Manchin and Senator Kyrsten Sinema must oppose this bill and demand an honest accounting of these programs to restore fiscal sanity.

[bold added]

Read more at Townhall

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Truth
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Del
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki iconOdnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • Yummly
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related

Next Post

Energy Sec. Under Fire For Favoring EV Co. She Owned Stock In, Was Board Member

Comments 2

  1. John Shewchuk says:
    3 years ago

    But we should listen to the climate model which won the Nobel Prize … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98zl8SlObLE

  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    3 years ago

    Build Back Better is as meaningless and as rediculous as Hope & Change since there was no hope involved and there was no change and besides the Bitter Biter Bittern is a way better toungue twister

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • newsom debate june 24Newsom Jets To DC To ‘Stand With’ Biden Amid Wildfire Emergency, Foregoes Virtual Meeting
    Jul 5, 2024
    After declaring a state of emergency over statewide wildfires, Newsom jetted to DC instead of meeting virtually as other governors did. […]
  • ev charging expoThe 500,000 Nationwide EV Charger Network Is A $7.5 Billion Charade
    Jul 5, 2024
    The 500,000 charging stations will cost the government $400 billion, not the $7.5 billion the President has promised. […]
  • wheat harvestIgnore The Climate Crisis Hype: Humanity Is Thriving Thanks To Fossil Fuels
    Jul 5, 2024
    Climate crisis? Thanks to fossil fuels, very few times in history have seen such rapid progress as the period from the mid-20th century to now. […]
  • electric car charging stationEnergy, Business Groups Urge Supreme Court To Halt California’s EV Mandate For All Americans
    Jul 5, 2024
    Numerous trade groups are asking the Supremes to review a lower court’s decision that allows California to push electric vehicles on the entire U.S. […]
  • Keir Starmer rallyAs Brits Struggle With Net Zero Costs, Labour Plans To Accelerate Unpopular Green Schemes
    Jul 3, 2024
    Fast-tracking Net Zero will hike energy bills, smother the economy, and spark an almighty backlash. And Labour is promising just that. […]
  • city underwaterMeteorologist Exposes How Media Is Hyping NOAA’s ‘Computer-Modeled’ Sea Level Scare
    Jul 3, 2024
    Hyperbolic predictions on New York City and sea level rise have been around for decades, and not one has come true or shown they will. […]
  • bavaria germanyJune 2024 German Weather Was Close To Normal, No ‘Hellish Summer’ In Sight
    Jul 3, 2024
    June in the Central European region was highly variable with periods of both cool and summery weather. In other words, no hellish summer in sight. […]
  • biden DC Emergency Operations CenterBiden Calls Climate Skeptics ‘Really, Really Dumb’, Announces WH Summit On Summer Heat
    Jul 3, 2024
    When Biden spoke at the D.C. Emergency Operations Center, he called Americans 'really, really dumb' for doubting his climate alarmist rhetoric. […]
  • hurricane berylAs Hurricane Beryl Swirls, Media Push Climate-Fueled Nonsense
    Jul 2, 2024
    The press and some meteorologists are saying that climate change is 'fueling' an historic Hurricane Beryl. Evidence says otherwise. […]
  • protest fight climate changeClimate Activists Have Embraced A Crazy New Goal: Abolish Fossil Fuels With Lawfare
    Jul 2, 2024
    After failing with consumers, businesses, and at the ballot box, climate nutters are using the courts to end fossil fuels. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Portions © 2024 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Climate Change Dispatch